Visite d’Emmanuel Macron à Doha : le Qatar commande 12 Rafale et 50 Airbus
Already posted in Rafale topic, but qhould also be here i believe.
Accrding to La Tribune, 12 more Rafale for Qatar tomorrow (it was an option)
There are no official info regarding any talks on the Belgian side. So far, ONE speaker (from the FR speaking part of the country) expressed his support to the French offer. No gov official. No member of the military.
The MoD officially disqualified the “Letter” (and the related offer).
Except prime minister sayed he would considerthe offer. When you don’t know, don’t talk (further more not make false assessments)…
Ok so Dassault didn’t bid but France did instead since this was to be a government led proposal
Not really. They proposed something else out of the RFPG.
Anyway, no company did participate as it is a gov to gov RFP…
However, like Boeing (who declined) they considered that the competition was fake. And that the offset part was too tiny to include what they proposed.
Boeing didnt want a second Denmark with fantasmagoric cost estimations etc.
One of the F-22 involved is OOO atm (problem with front wheels
I think there is no dedicated topic for Belgium, so i’ll post it here.
Parly (french DM) proposes 4 billions of offset in Belgieum for 150 entreprises.
[QUOTE] Le partenariat que propose la France, ce sont aussi plus de 150 sociétés belges qui ont déjà été approchées et une centaine de projets industriels ou technologiques pour un montant de 4 milliards d’euros.[QUOTE]
JPO has wanted to eliminate superfluous points
The wanteed to eliminate as many points as they could, THEN declared as many as possible as superfluous. Tha tis why IOT&E is (maybe i should say as) an independant organiztation. Not biased views…
Regarding “Recce”; In the Danish eval two of the missions were described as:
Non-Traditional Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (NTISR), and:
Strike, Coordination and Reconnaissance (SCAR).
VERY reductive vision that could only show how biased the eval was biased…
@Eagle1:
Not anymore. Staring sensors are small clustered cells with very high definition data already digitalised.
teah ye ye… optics do not rely on optics anymore… Sure…
And the GoI is now facing some political heat for ignoring normal procedure by awarding a single vendor contract where there were two technically compliant entries. Also for bypassing the MoD & cabinet to sign the MoU at Paris, which handicapped the MoD in subsequent negotiations.
Asolutely not. GOI is fully entitled to award a single vendor contract for urgent needs and/or strategic needs. Normal procedure. I told you a bove. Forumers in India told us to expect a mudslingin campaign. Here it is.
Britain’s biggest-ever arms deal faces renewed scrutiny after Saudi Arabia placed it at the centre of an urgent criminal investigation as part of the kingdom’s anti-corruption drive.
One of the hundreds of princes, ministers and businessmen held in the country’s unprecedented purge of senior figures is Prince Turki bin Nasser, the royal at the centre of the so-called al-Yamamah scandal, The Times has been told.
The Saudi decision to investigate the £43 billion deal created political pressure last night for Britain to reopen its investigation into al-Yamamah, which was halted in 2006 on the orders of Tony Blair, prime minister at the time.
…
“The ugly truth behind this was never revealed,” Sir Vince said. “It is embarrassing that Saudi Arabia is now leading us on transparency. The Serious Fraud Office should reopen this case. The Foreign Office and SFO must also fully co-operate with this investigation. It is almost a decade since I sought thorough debates in parliament to have this properly investigated, but the government of the day and the official opposition sought to maintain secrecy.”
…
The al-Yamamah deal involved the sale of arms, particularly fighter planes, by BAE Systems, the former British Aerospace, to Saudi Arabia over two decades from the 1980s. The series of contracts was sealed with huge support from the government of Margaret Thatcher. But the path was also allegedly smoothed by multimillion- dollar “commissions” to middlemen, most notably Prince Turki, a former deputy head of the Saudi Royal Air Force.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/saudi-purge-may-lift-lid-on-43bn-bae-arms-deal-ppx7l72l7
Well. Disminishing number of tests, simulating others etc. Is putting lives in danger so as to gain few months. Simply crazy. Test programs are something complex, changing number and schedules can inavertedly lead to wrong results… this article (dated january 2018 btw) is bragging, but many negative facts. DOT was sacked because not enough complacent, and now reducing test program… Silly short sighted view. Call me whatever name, this is criminal.
No, a clean Gripen NG needs only 500m takeoff, and 600 meter for landing
Weird. More than Rafale…
Hallow, Shrinks are cheap nowadays. You’ll get some adequate support. Relieve yourself my friend. I can’t be your single obsession the way it goes.
Expert advice. TY.
F-35: Exiting the Pattern
http://www.airforcemag.com/MagazineArchive/Pages/2018/January%202018/F-35-Exiting-the-Pattern.aspx
“we want to use the simulator to reduce the amount of test points we have to fly”
if the airplane’s performance matches certain data points in the flight envelope, it’s not necessary to fly all the data points in between.
Mismanagement… calendar event led development etc. Pityful. And of course block 4 will not be there in time…