Maybe if you use old numbers, but it’s already less expensive to buy than the Rafale (see the Indian contract) and is likely less than Eurofighter
compare apples to apples please.
How a plane (Gripen *E) can have proven maintanability record whil it hasn’t flown yet? Separation of flight and other systems done since Mirage 2000 btw. Nothing really new. Proven offset deals? YES, you mean monkey money for Lula’s son? Nothing proven yet, Brazil do not have a single plane yet… Integration of new features… Sorry, you will allways need aerodynamics, separation tests, not to talk with weapon system nupgrades… Systems are virtualized? Well yes, on F-35 and Rafale also.
Btw, SAAB learnt model development model from Dassault during NeuroN project… Nvm.
They are really serious about competing with India for the worst run aircraft procurement program in history title.
You mean they may both end buying F-35?
http://m.aviationweek.com/combat-aircraft/us-navy-green-lights-new-and-improved-super-hornet
just answered in usaf topic
USNAvy, not µUSAF, cdunno where to place it.
U.S. Navy Green-Lights New And Improved Super Hornet
http://m.aviationweek.com/combat-aircraft/us-navy-green-lights-new-and-improved-super-hornet
Some see a bit of contradiction in the Berlin-Paris pledges and the recent request for F-35 Briefing by Germany
https://www.lesechos.fr/monde/europe…se-2091403.php
Sincerely, Germany has been knocking at FCAS door for years now (even proposing to build a fighter inside it). I wouild more see it as a threat. but of course it isn’t compeltely mutuallyexclusive (FCAS and F-35)
In the meanwhile canada DM announces (again) a fair competition ahead.
ing with bigger area need to be thinner and has higher sweep angle so as to not increase drag too much
That’s why delta was created…
Ok then. Testimony to the fiability of tests. Still… These weren’t brand new airframes, and as pilot i would like to know sturdiness of my mount was proven “irl”. (and no i’m not saying i’ve veen fighter pilot).
Testimony to F-15 toughness (aswell as mirage 3)
Rafale for Peru? doubtful, but…
kk. No pun intended. Btw, going over 9g for Rafale need to pass a “crank” (normal FBW limit to 9, you have to push further to obtain max domain).
Wing loading comparisons are irrelevance without knowing lift coefficient. F-35 has also been tested to 9.9G
Generally speaking, wing is-by far- the part of the plane that will have the best Cz. Hence larger wings = Better Cz of an airframe. (cf F-35 C that NEED larger wing to land on carriers)
9.9g? Done duri ng each airshow by some eurocanard. Pityful test value… eg. A mirage 3C one went over 14g and still landed later. (ok, the airframe ,was out after).
You are not going to get supersonic any more,
Untrue for both eurocanards…. They will pass transsonic zone with A2A combat loads without reheat. Which F-35 cannot afaik.
Capabilities still to be inducted… (air to sea, decent cas, air to groun d on moving targets, decent eair to nair payloads etc. etc.