Video od supposed training for PAS17

your speculation about interesting time is erroneous as F-35 only arrived during second week so was not opposed to anyother “blue”, be it F-22, Typhoon or Rafale.

if you checked what was,written, the author himself said that “cost perimeter” is disputable. There is no cost analysis. Which is near impossible to ndo. Eg. retrofit contract : where to put it? inside LRIP? Btw, Yves did write to jPO but did not get any answer to his questions. Where di i push comptroller metric? In the end, all costs add…

it is paper , not internet ste. Won’t spend my time scanning nit for you, take it or leave it. The first in last out referred to playtime.

Can we stop with pilots stories without any evidences please?. It is annoying and doesn’t add anything to the discussion.

As usual, denial..; However. Raids Aviation, n° 30, JUN/JUL 2017, p. 56 line 1 “The Rafale had the most inttersting playtime thanks to the use of 3 suersonic 1200L tanks”. clear enough? Referenced enough?

(i) you call ma armchair general,hence the general. (ii) DOD acounting practices are close to robbery in the case of F-35. I am just giving a list of the executed contracts and their ncosts.you are pathetic tryi ng to use SAR as definitive value document. Whatever claims, in the end the only real number paid by taxpayers are those available on usaspendings. (accountability documents) and yes you said for several weeks that swiss leaks documents could not be true as evaluations aren’t quoted that way. Remember?
Sintra, please check on eithernusa spending or fdps with contract number, very simple…

As i said, last issue of raids aviation. Nothing abnormal as Rafale can take 3 supersonic 1200L tanks.

About the searchb page Spudman, why don’t you go on on fdps governmental site and type
N0001914C0002 (contract nuber) in search engine? bio, ever been a general? remeber when you nwere spamming everywherethat swiss eval leak was a fake? i prefer to stick to actual accounting documents than to jpo plain lies.