5k lb Is more than enough for any large munition.
Thats exactly wahy USAF is buying more F15. Large ammos areNOT a large bunch of ammos.Put 2 storms shadows under a F-35 for example to have a good laugh.
Both are in Swotzerland and in Finland no?
On the other hand i could say that given the procliviry of F-Teens to dinish in ashes vs Rafale, dadadada…
Shall i remind you that F-35 and Rafale were once opposed in Netherlands and how close were quotations? F-35 certianly has advantages (it is easy to enter first while stealthy for example), but also some setbacks (unable to carry very big ammos etc.)
My bad conference is very interesting. However, comparing F-35 to old F-16/15 mostly. Not a single word about other planes claiming to have a performing data fusion (Gripen E and Rafale) and inner EW systems.
Noone said that. And uyes heritage foundation deserves the same trash bin as sputnik etc. Tea parties…
Which dose not mean that the facts they cite are wrong, exactly as RT or defense aerospace.
Heritage foundation is nearly (maybe even worse ) relaiable as RT… On the opposite site. bunch of old ultra liberalist so called analysts.
I see the US buying a lot of cheese, chocolate, and clocks 😉
you always see that… chocolate is a new name for F-35?
Vivid green is great. But tell us, was there a 1965 Chrisler parked aside?
how smart seb
Mats Hegelsson will present the new trianing system the 16th of june in Paris. Will give you further details if i can attend.
As maintenanced is already included in contract as to be done by RUAG in a different item, i doubt F-35 can reach that.
Smiley’s are just kiddish. That’s all. U-28 accounting for 20% of the value of fighters? Despairing…
Interrogations about F-35 raising costs consequences in Norway.
https://www.klassekampen.no/article/20190516/ARTICLE/190519976
This has been discussed already when the RFI was out: if I remind correctly, maintenance and fleet sustainement can be part of the offset calculation which would make in 20year (my mem only) quite an easy sum to balance… This is very different from the MMRCA in India
Correction: it’s 30years and this was even stated at the bottom of the article:
:rolleyes:
First off all you can use as many smileys as you want, it will not give anymore weight to your statements.
Second the total amount is 100% and who told you in switzerland th fleet sustainlment could be part of offset calculation in switzerland? Your faith?
Pour le prochain avion de combat, le groupe suisse sera désigné comme centre de compétences pour le matériel (CCM) au lancement du projet. Il réalisera les tâches, non dévolues à l’armée suisse, concernant le suivi technique du système, la gestion du matériel entre la Suisse et l’étranger et la maintenance des avions
It is already in the RFP that RUAG iwill be responsible tof fleet sustainment. Nothing to do with offsets.
Twisting facts as mch as you want will not change them.
Oh btw, did you notice that 20% of the offsets can be accounted as anterior to the RFP (RUAG, Pilatus…)
Switzerland asked for 60% offsets going to their BIT
https://www.latribune.fr/entreprises…ir-773068.html
Good luck to F-35…
several antennas above the chine also.
This is defens’aero not defense-aerospace.
Here is the original picture
check at 0.41