dark light

halloweene

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 4,136 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2098771
    halloweene
    Participant

    Rafale arrived in switzerland for eval. Interesting to notice that one of them is bearing a sniper pod and HMJ (Targo II)

    [ATTACH=JSON]{“data-align”:”none”,”data-size”:”full”,”title”:”ob_3fdc94_dq01-3.jpg”,”data-attachmentid”:3862570}[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2098779
    halloweene
    Participant

    They are. Nt more PESA radars were produced since signature. They are basically F3R standard.

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2098997
    halloweene
    Participant
    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2099126
    halloweene
    Participant
    halloweene
    Participant

    The five stars are for Mif/Sukhoi intercepted.

    halloweene
    Participant

    There is something i do not like in that plane (air intakes)

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2099524
    halloweene
    Participant

    T give an example of photonics, best known daily are photoelectric cells and fiber optic signal transmission. Photonic study (over simplified) interactions of photons and elcetric/magnetic fields, aswel as interaction with materials.

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2099544
    halloweene
    Participant

    After Plasma Stealth now is Rofar strikes again. Here we go. 😎

    plasma stealth is indeed experimented. How ever, it would be incredibly costly to use it on an aircraft. Could be used to hide antennas for example, and only on a ultra stealth plane/drone.

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2099547
    halloweene
    Participant

    uantum entanglement by comparing 2 different photons

    photons a linked by pairs. Change the spin of one, you will change the spin of the other.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2099554
    halloweene
    Participant

    Shit happens.

    in reply to: Swiss Air Force combat fighter competition 2.0 #2099621
    halloweene
    Participant

    What is “basic” ISR?

    How do you differentiate intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance from the reconnaissance part? This does not makes sense.

    Simply put, F-35 – or a targeting pod with basic ISR capabilities- has nothing such as a sophisticated and dedicated 1.5T reccepod can give (be it focal, number of sensors etc.). “basi isr” is also known as NT (non traditional) ISR.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2099709
    halloweene
    Participant

    This one takes the cake! For someone who spends so much time trying to find new and innovative ways to malign the F-35, one would sure think that you would exercise some bit of understanding and common sense even at a very basic level.

    The issues with Canada will be sorted out. If they want an open competition that is at the terms that may end up violating an MOU that they signed earlier, they are happy to do so by withdrawing from one to pursue the other option. The JPO will likely want to protect the integrity of the multi-nation JSF program of which Canada is a very small part. In this case they’ll likely recommend to the DOD that the aircraft not be offered because opening up this box will not be equitable given other partnerships. In that case, Canada and is industry could potentially lose out on Billions of future production and sustainment work for a program that is going to be pumping out more than a thousand aircraft over the next decade compared to others in the running that may not even reach 500 sales over their entire production lifetime. Industrial contribution is no doubt one aspect so these things matter along with others. Honestly, I don’t mind the current Canadian government deciding either way. There are other partners and future offset customers who would be happy to absorb that work over the coming years and decades and the F-35 program does not have a problem of finding the buyers needed to tick the build rate to 150 or more which brings the EOS for affordable procurement as we enter into MYP in the coming years.

    I do not maligh the F-35. I criticize the PROGRAM. Maybe sometime i do exaggerate, but there is so much fanboyism around that program that it is needed here.

    nevermind… have more important things to do in RL.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2099964
    halloweene
    Participant

    1st we are still in SDD.

    2nd

    Your link is from 2012… 7years ago…

    “No requirement will be imposed by any Participant for work sharing” and only an “internet lawyer” could think otherwise. The letters from the DoD were also clear on this subject.

    Where is it written procurement? Letters from DoD engage… DoD

    Funny YOU talking about internet lawyer spud.

    Finally a MOU is NOT a contract. Nothing more but a letter of intention. Dubious about validity in cas of trial. And i don’t think LM and DoD would be threatening Canada if they weren’t kind of afraid of something…

    PS at least that shows that there cannot be any offsets from F-35 contracts and that when LM promises them (cf Belgium) it is just hot air.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2099978
    halloweene
    Participant

    Nice MOU

    I can read for example

    Production of the JSF Air Vehicle, including propulsion systems (both F135 and F136).

    but no, RR was f… up, no F136. Too bad for brits.

    Actual procurement of JSF Air Vehicles by the Participants will be subject to the Participants’ national laws and regulations and the outcome of the Participants’ national procurement decision-making processes.

    Some should write an article on how this MOU was followed…

    Btw, where is Canadian PPR?

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2100021
    halloweene
    Participant

    Sorry, but what you wrote is in no way saying that canada must ot include offsets. Full and open competition for the project do not mean that (i) their would be no offsets, one can perfectly have an open competition including offsets

    And it is all (section 5) about submitting as sb contractor, nothing about plane acquisition.

    (ii)

    to the extent consistent with the national laws, regulations, and policies of the Contracting Participant

    Isn”t that clear?

    The MOU is about

    The overall Project work to be performed under this MOU is the production, sustainment, and follow-on development

    Nothing about preocurement

    Canada has a reglation about offsets, sorry.(and even on how they must be distributed around Canada).

    AND AGAIN FRANCE HAVE NOTHING TI DO HERE PLEASE STOP DRAGGING IT IN

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 4,136 total)