dark light

halloweene

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,246 through 1,260 (of 4,136 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2131891
    halloweene
    Participant

    External fuel tanks were at a time studied and withdrawn later…

    Computational Optimization of the F-35 External Fuel
    Tank for Store Separation

    46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
    7 – 10 January 2008, Reno, Nevada

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2132083
    halloweene
    Participant

    [QUOTE=mrmalaya;2385601]

    None so far, I believe vague mention by the MOD of using other capabilities…Brimstone/Storm Shadow/Tomahawk/Spear

    Is it perhaps because they see the role of FCAS (or its operational successor) as clearing the way for manned aircraft with things like Spear3? Anyway, like you say, there are no plans to fill the gap, and that makes me wonder what the broader thinking is rather than look for a weapon that will go after missile sites.

    Definitely yes. Strategists tend to consider ARM missiles as a single tool in a vast networked panoply. Considering couple vector/weapon isolated is porbably a vision of the past (at least it is my uneducated position)

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2132231
    halloweene
    Participant

    Nowhere near long enough in range, that’s a heli-ASuW missile designed for patrol boats and fast attack craft. The original plan was an ARM version of Meteor called ARMINGER.

    http://ukarmedforcescommentary.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/replacing-alarm-fighting-in-hostile.html

    Marte ER was tipped for the anti-ship role but Storm Shadow MLU could also add a more advanced ASuW capability.

    ARMINGER is based on Meteor. Incredibly expensive. About Marte ER or SS, you may be right.

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2132234
    halloweene
    Participant

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2132239
    halloweene
    Participant

    http://aviationweek.com/farnborough-airshow-2016/fighter-aircraft-procurement-plans-19-european-countries

    Anybody who has further info on the German Typhoon SEAD plans?

    Probably a tweaked variant of SeaVenom/ANL missile. No clue.

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2132968
    halloweene
    Participant

    I’m curious. These days, F-35 is participating to Trilat exercise. On french AdlA website, it is mentioned that first days wil be devoted to BFM for F-22, Typhoon and Rafale, but no mention of F-35. Any idea?

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2133026
    halloweene
    Participant

    Radar? You mean using its main radar has an offensive/Defensive EW asset?
    If that was the question, the answer is no, the only “operational” fighter that i am aware that is described publicly has having such a capability is good old Dave (there are a few old slides from Boeing touting the APG-79 has having the potential to do such a role).
    If the question is “does the Praetorian DASS uses active arrays in its ECM/EW suite” the answer is yes.

    Cheers

    Wasn’t it the aim of program “Bright Adder” for future Uk AESA? I’m going to be slaughtered to say that, but calling Dave operational is a language abuse to me µi thought AP 79 had some capabilities in this field?

    in reply to: pros and cons of over fueselage air intakes #2133029
    halloweene
    Participant

    Mounting the intake on top is a great way to starve the engine of airflow in a tight turn, or any elevated AoA.

    /agree

    Only interest i could see is discretion vs ground installations.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2133537
    halloweene
    Participant

    They may see some further (minor) sales in the ME — otherwise I think it will be the end of the line in 2023.

    A great jet, but too late and too expensive.

    Don’t be so pessimistic. Many recent improvements and AESA could be a game changer.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2134474
    halloweene
    Participant

    Someone believes Russia was an independent state In the 80’s. The moron of the month 🙂

    Oh, they were invaded and controlled by other ussr republics, sry i forgot дебил

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2134603
    halloweene
    Participant

    Hillary Emails Reveal True Motive for Libya Intervention

    No more Conspiracies now. :rolleyes:

    Pffff. Plz read the

    About
    Foreign Policy Journal is an online publication dedicated to providing news, critical analysis, and commentary on US foreign policy and international affairs.

    Its purpose is to challenge the propaganda narratives presented by the mainstream media, which serve to manufacture consent for government policies.

    Typical conspirationist…

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2134652
    halloweene
    Participant

    Actually every weopon is a chemical weopon when you consider long term effects like cancer and birth defects. Russia has already scolded Natinyaho for interfferring in Syria. Russia does not interfere untill this point in otherwars in like Yemen, Afghanistan, Irak. This kind of selective outrages will make Russia double down and create far greater casualties in every theatre.

    Russia do not intervene in Afghanistan!!! :highly_amused: Best post of the month?

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2134759
    halloweene
    Participant

    Same as those?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]252410[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2134798
    halloweene
    Participant

    In other words, you’re calling for economic sanctions against the US, correct?

    Legally talking, yes.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2134802
    halloweene
    Participant

    This doesn’t even matter ! It does not even matter if Assad did it. If Assad did it, does not absolve Trump from breaking international law, constitutional law and all the political norms therein.

    And not only does it not matter poltically, if Assad did it or not. It doesn’t change anything strategically on the ground. Trump cannot send in ground forces to take out Assad ! That would mean, that Trump would have to read the same ultimatum to Vladimir Putin, that George Bush read to Saddam Hussain.

    So no more smoking gun posts. Or aha posts. Because it doesn’t matter. In other news…

    Syrian Warplanes From US-Hit Air Base Said To Resume Air Strikes-ZeroHedge

    SOHR: military sources witnessed two warplanes taking off from Shayrat airbase less than 24 hours after it got hit w/ dozens of US Tomahawks

    That is absolutely right. USA did not have any legal to intervene in Syria. Like Russia in Ukraine?

Viewing 15 posts - 1,246 through 1,260 (of 4,136 total)