dark light

Erkokite

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 507 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Air to air combat , helicopter venus jet fighter #2302457
    Erkokite
    Participant

    i know the blade have large radar return , and i know if the heli is moving there will be no problem for the fighter to shot down it, but what if the heli is hover stationary will the blade show on the jet’s radar screen 😎 because the heli blades actually spinning in a small circle so will they be rejected by the radar just like chaff:)

    Rotor blades in general are a huge no-no for radar cross section. I doubt it matters whether the helicopter is moving or not. And in any event modern radars likely have software for discriminating between chaff and rotor blades.

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2316225
    Erkokite
    Participant

    Superconducting materials have special radar absorbance properties by exploiting the inefficiency of high temperature superconductors above their Tc (critical temperatures). It has been shown that the RCS is reduced as the magnetic field increases -in turn increasing the surface resistance within the magnetic field. The effect is more pronounced as radiation resistance decreases and superconductors are particularly efficient at absorbing X-band (microwaves), exhibiting behaviour akin to radar absorbing lossy magnetic materials such as carbonyl & ferrite iron that respond to the magnetic field in a microwave.

    To date, using superconducting materials for stealth applications have been focused on the aircraft’s antennas, in an attempt to address the problem of scattering and turning the absorbed radar waves to thermal energy.

    Magnesium Boride/diboride (Mg-B) properties as a superconductor have only recently been discovered (2001), it has broken new ground for superconductivity based on the well known electron-phonon interaction and hence would be particularly efficient at radar absorbance.

    OAO ‘NPP Motor’ in association with the Ufa State Technical Aviation University have established a working fan-blade of the [engine] compressor’s first stage based on a magnesium boride matrix (Mg-B) and reinforced carbon fibre composite. Note the carbon fibre composite is low reflective. This has been around 5 years in the works.

    ‘NPP Motor’ are a contractor for the PAK-FA Stage 2 engine.

    I triple checked everything- it’s the real deal.

    Superconductors require cryogenic temperatures to work. You’re not going to get that in jet engine fan blades.

    in reply to: J-20 Thread 7 #2318859
    Erkokite
    Participant

    Well, marble is about .0001, golf ball is .001.

    http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?reload=true&arnumber=6086921&contentType=Conference+Publications

    This is an article on Chinese GaN X-band T/R module research. If it’s weaponized and it turns out the J-20 has a 2500 module AESA, then you have a 50 kw peak power AESA. Never mind that by the time the J-20 reaches operational status, the F-22 and F-35 will be on GaN AESAs as well.

    Radar power output is limited by cooling, emissions control, and most importantly by engine generator power output.

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2357929
    Erkokite
    Participant

    The panel from the photo seems to be 1 cm thick.
    I recall DjCross when T-50 flew first saying that from panels thickness one could approximately give what kind of band radars the platform will be invisible.Can somebody confirm this and what would be the target?
    Sorry if the assumption sounds silly

    This is true, but only to a certain extent. Convenctional RAM requires a certain thickness to be effective (I think on the order the wavelength/2 or the wavelength/4 IIRC). This is also true of conventional Jaumann absorbers. However, comparatively new (that is to the conventional Jaumann absorber) capacitive Jaumann absorbers do not require this. This is what the F-35 is rumored to use, and it would make sense for the T-50 to use the same.

    in reply to: F-35 News thread. Part Deux #2358324
    Erkokite
    Participant

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jul/10/navy-admiral-hints-at-jettisoning-f-35-fighter/

    Adm. Jonathan W. Greenert isn’t convinced of “stealth” for the future,
    or rather, he won’t depend on stealth as a mean of surviving

    Where can Greenert’s original article be found?

    in reply to: China awaits fighter export breakthrough #2286619
    Erkokite
    Participant

    I thought the J-10b is going to be exported to Pakistan as the FC-20?

    in reply to: Rafale news XII #2334053
    Erkokite
    Participant

    Isn’t Damocles XF supposed to be better?

    in reply to: AVIC JF-17 Thunder versus SAAB JAS-39 Gripen #2342344
    Erkokite
    Participant

    I cannot do Calculus with Excel

    Try dx*SUM([function values]).

    in reply to: Norwegian Hercules missing. #2342717
    Erkokite
    Participant

    RIP. 🙁

    in reply to: AVIC F-60, the Chinese F-22? #2345629
    Erkokite
    Participant

    No, it’s the AVIC JF-17’s DSI, since JF-17 prototype PT-06 flew over 3 months before F-35 prototype AA-1 did. 😉

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JF-17

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-35

    Yeah… no.

    in reply to: Rafale news XII #2346462
    Erkokite
    Participant

    The Rafale has flown with CFT’s right?

    in reply to: Turkish Air Force Wedgetail Delivery via Stansted #2294180
    Erkokite
    Participant

    I think Tu-214 is cool. Maybe Russians can experiment with a Phalcon style lay out like the Singaporeans..
    http://www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/middle/0/1/1/1211110.jpg

    I’d like to see that on the SSJ-100.

    in reply to: Rafale vs F-16b52+ and J-10 #2294306
    Erkokite
    Participant

    What’s the difference between F-16 Block 50/52 and Block 50/52+? According to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZ67uX8SVOE , Block 50/52 were from the year 2003. J-10 Generation Uno is comparable to Block 50/52, the one that doesn’t have AESA.

    The engines- one uses GE the other uses Pratt IIRC.

    in reply to: UK considers Rafale and F-18 as 'interim aircraft' #2341830
    Erkokite
    Participant

    What does the Rafale have for a short-range HOBS missile? I mean something like IRIS-T, AIM-9X, Python 5 would seem to be a natural couple for for the upcoming HMD for the Indian Rafale.

    in reply to: Rafale vs F-16b52+ and J-10 #2345070
    Erkokite
    Participant

    The Rafale AESA has 1000+ elements per Dassault, and will eventually be upgraded to use GaN elements. Sensor fused AWACS support, datalinks, satcom, OSF-NG, SPECTRA, etc… will likely negate any differences in radar range.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 507 total)