i know the blade have large radar return , and i know if the heli is moving there will be no problem for the fighter to shot down it, but what if the heli is hover stationary will the blade show on the jet’s radar screen 😎 because the heli blades actually spinning in a small circle so will they be rejected by the radar just like chaff:)
Rotor blades in general are a huge no-no for radar cross section. I doubt it matters whether the helicopter is moving or not. And in any event modern radars likely have software for discriminating between chaff and rotor blades.
Superconducting materials have special radar absorbance properties by exploiting the inefficiency of high temperature superconductors above their Tc (critical temperatures). It has been shown that the RCS is reduced as the magnetic field increases -in turn increasing the surface resistance within the magnetic field. The effect is more pronounced as radiation resistance decreases and superconductors are particularly efficient at absorbing X-band (microwaves), exhibiting behaviour akin to radar absorbing lossy magnetic materials such as carbonyl & ferrite iron that respond to the magnetic field in a microwave.
To date, using superconducting materials for stealth applications have been focused on the aircraft’s antennas, in an attempt to address the problem of scattering and turning the absorbed radar waves to thermal energy.
Magnesium Boride/diboride (Mg-B) properties as a superconductor have only recently been discovered (2001), it has broken new ground for superconductivity based on the well known electron-phonon interaction and hence would be particularly efficient at radar absorbance.
OAO ‘NPP Motor’ in association with the Ufa State Technical Aviation University have established a working fan-blade of the [engine] compressor’s first stage based on a magnesium boride matrix (Mg-B) and reinforced carbon fibre composite. Note the carbon fibre composite is low reflective. This has been around 5 years in the works.
‘NPP Motor’ are a contractor for the PAK-FA Stage 2 engine.
I triple checked everything- it’s the real deal.
Superconductors require cryogenic temperatures to work. You’re not going to get that in jet engine fan blades.
Well, marble is about .0001, golf ball is .001.
This is an article on Chinese GaN X-band T/R module research. If it’s weaponized and it turns out the J-20 has a 2500 module AESA, then you have a 50 kw peak power AESA. Never mind that by the time the J-20 reaches operational status, the F-22 and F-35 will be on GaN AESAs as well.
Radar power output is limited by cooling, emissions control, and most importantly by engine generator power output.
The panel from the photo seems to be 1 cm thick.
I recall DjCross when T-50 flew first saying that from panels thickness one could approximately give what kind of band radars the platform will be invisible.Can somebody confirm this and what would be the target?
Sorry if the assumption sounds silly
This is true, but only to a certain extent. Convenctional RAM requires a certain thickness to be effective (I think on the order the wavelength/2 or the wavelength/4 IIRC). This is also true of conventional Jaumann absorbers. However, comparatively new (that is to the conventional Jaumann absorber) capacitive Jaumann absorbers do not require this. This is what the F-35 is rumored to use, and it would make sense for the T-50 to use the same.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jul/10/navy-admiral-hints-at-jettisoning-f-35-fighter/
Adm. Jonathan W. Greenert isn’t convinced of “stealth” for the future,
or rather, he won’t depend on stealth as a mean of surviving
Where can Greenert’s original article be found?
I thought the J-10b is going to be exported to Pakistan as the FC-20?
Isn’t Damocles XF supposed to be better?
I cannot do Calculus with Excel
Try dx*SUM([function values]).
RIP. 🙁
No, it’s the AVIC JF-17’s DSI, since JF-17 prototype PT-06 flew over 3 months before F-35 prototype AA-1 did. 😉
Yeah… no.
The Rafale has flown with CFT’s right?
I think Tu-214 is cool. Maybe Russians can experiment with a Phalcon style lay out like the Singaporeans..
I’d like to see that on the SSJ-100.
What’s the difference between F-16 Block 50/52 and Block 50/52+? According to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZ67uX8SVOE , Block 50/52 were from the year 2003. J-10 Generation Uno is comparable to Block 50/52, the one that doesn’t have AESA.
The engines- one uses GE the other uses Pratt IIRC.
What does the Rafale have for a short-range HOBS missile? I mean something like IRIS-T, AIM-9X, Python 5 would seem to be a natural couple for for the upcoming HMD for the Indian Rafale.
The Rafale AESA has 1000+ elements per Dassault, and will eventually be upgraded to use GaN elements. Sensor fused AWACS support, datalinks, satcom, OSF-NG, SPECTRA, etc… will likely negate any differences in radar range.