dark light

quadbike

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,681 through 1,695 (of 3,473 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Is China using a new roundel? #2331012
    quadbike
    Participant

    Still way better than the bullseye used by IAF, RAF, Italian and French Air forces etc, those just scream shoot here.

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 6 #2331031
    quadbike
    Participant

    So Kovy and others, can we expect to see the Rafale in Aero India 2011.

    in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2331505
    quadbike
    Participant

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-12125566

    Americans saying it wont be operational anytime soon. 2020 ?

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 6 #2331661
    quadbike
    Participant

    oh, and were there any leaks or results from the recent RAF/IndAF exercises in country?

    I may have missed it but things have been unusually quiet on that front (when compared to other Indian SU30 outings).

    Since when have IAF been not quiet after exercises. In cope India 2004-05 it was the Americans who (may be in order to get more Raptors) broke the news that the Su 30s and Bisons were a handful in combat. Again at Redflag 2008 with Youtube Terry, the IAF only rebutted his false claims.

    In the previous Indra exercises both sides were praising each others planes. Same with exercises with France with Rafale, there were no talk of who won which or what, basically write ups on how invaluable the training was and praise for each others aircraft.

    So being quite about the RAF/IAF recent exercise suggests nothing.

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 6 #2331791
    quadbike
    Participant

    The GE F414 & American sanctions stuff is tiring. I don’t think IAF or policy makers in India thinks the U.S will be having any porblems with India in the near or near distant future, this is the reason why LCA MK2 engine deal was awarded to GE.

    If there was a risk why put it on your own fighter ?

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 6 #2331827
    quadbike
    Participant

    IIRC Typhoon had a demonstrator which flew in 2007 with AESA but they did not have it flying in 2009 or 2010 for the India. And there is no proof that AESA is a must for technical bid.

    People like Swerve and Scorpion can shed more light on the above.

    I think AESA is not a must, but having one ready would increase your prospects. This is the greatest advantage the Americans have with their mature AESAs.

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 6 #2331958
    quadbike
    Participant

    Indian National Congress, the main party in the ruling U.P.A in India is still fighting the ghosts of the Bofors artillery gun scam along with many other corruption charges (thankfully none of them with regards to defense).

    At this point I think they will reduce any possibility of a future corruption probe and will award the contract to the L1 bidder which has met all the IAF parameters.

    I think it is between the F 16 and Gripen and may be the Super Hornet (going by the quoted price its only marginally expensive than Gripen and F 16).

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 6 #2331969
    quadbike
    Participant

    Kindly give proof that the Eurofighter which participated in the MRCA field trials had an AESA. IIRC they didn’t have any flying prototype to bring to India.

    in reply to: Air War over Iran – Part 2 #2333266
    quadbike
    Participant

    I think Israelis will wait till their layer air defense has fully taken shape. Saudis are also going for AEGIS..hmmmm

    quadbike
    Participant

    I think its because of the key pub ownership, that makes them vulnerable to legal action in a sue friendly country like the UK. An independent forum may be less concerned of such issues.

    Posting links is just fine, its not convenient but news is news !

    in reply to: Export orders J-20 vs PAK-FA??? #2333611
    quadbike
    Participant

    Unsubstantiated claims as the two have not met in combat. The results have been mixed when the Gripens met older Vipers.

    I doubt the Gripen will have any edge in BVR.

    in reply to: Export orders J-20 vs PAK-FA??? #2333770
    quadbike
    Participant

    well if that’s the case, switch it to under 50 million Pounds, and then the F-16E would qualify 😉

    IIRC it costs well over 70 million USD;)

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 6 #2334377
    quadbike
    Participant

    Ok Stupid question ? But what can the Americans do if the French say **** you and sell MIDS without U.S approval. French may use its stock to supply it well in excess that maintenence won’t be an issue.

    Would the Americans have the balls to alienate the French over this ? I doubt that in the current political situation.

    Atleast till the Meteor is operational the Americans have more leverage with the Typhoon.

    in reply to: Export orders J-20 vs PAK-FA??? #2334981
    quadbike
    Participant

    I have to agree with both TR1 and Scooter.

    TR1 has a valid point that the J-20s presence will make many asian nations consider a Fifth generation fighter,

    But that may not be the PAK FA !

    I can easily see the western allied countries going for the F 35 with a renewed urgency. The Japanese and Koreans may go for a modified F 35 rather than building something from scratch.

    The Malaysians have decided to keep their MIG 29N for now (against plans of early retirement) and will soon need to replace their Hornets as well. They are a swing state interms of weapons purchases and can go either way (can buy the F 35 or the FGFA).

    Indonasia can afford and will probably buy the PAK FA.

    Vietnam is another likely customer.

    There is a real market for a smaller lighter fifth generation aircraft. The F 35 don’t cut that profile despite being single engined, and the J 20/FGFA are too big.

    in reply to: Export orders J-20 vs PAK-FA??? #2335133
    quadbike
    Participant

    If you are strictly speaking export buys then the PAKFA certainly will be exported more. India is already commited to 250-300 PAKFA/FGFA. I expect the Malaysians and Indonasians to follow in future.

    The countries who buy Russian weaponry tend to have larger airforces and more money than the countries which buy Chinese weapons. And the J 20 may be just too expensive to buy and operate for many of them.

    Having said that I believe with China’s economic progress we may have more J20s in service with the PLAAF at one point than the combined fleet of PAKFAs of Russia and India.

    It may end up just below the F 35 in total numbers built.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,681 through 1,695 (of 3,473 total)