dark light

quadbike

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,206 through 2,220 (of 3,473 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: HELLENIC AIR FORCE NEWS & DISCUSSION #2377998
    quadbike
    Participant

    RIP

    in reply to: Euro-fighter F-35 fight heats up! #2378315
    quadbike
    Participant

    Isn’t there a Hornet vs MiG 29 dogfight video (Swiss and Germans I think) where the Hornet kicks ass.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News & Discussion # 13 #2378606
    quadbike
    Participant

    Nice strategy. First post a chart by god knows who and once the people get overwhelmed by the misrepresenting figures for their products, they should come, correct the figures and reveal the info meant to be between buyers and suppliers. And all this happens in the thread of iaf which then gets apportioned the blame for the workings of anonymous denizens of the net.

    Create a thread for your chart if it suits you. Whatever iaf needs to know it knows from vendors directly. Don’t know whom you are compiling this for:confused:

    No one complained when some one posted the 4.5 generation chart out of the blue, so I posted one which was more stupid, I got it from BR.

    Really don’t know what your problem is ?

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion IV #2378717
    quadbike
    Participant

    RB15 mk 3 can act as Anti-Ship and as Cruise missile.

    Is there an air launched version of that ?

    According to Wiki

    RBS-15 Mk. III
    Range 200 km, with land attack capability. There is only a ship launched version. Production started in 2004. New Oval launch tubes instead of the old box type.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion IV #2378792
    quadbike
    Participant

    It does not make economic or other sense to bother with integration of indian cruise missiles on these a/c when the better suited for the task Su-30 MKI already is.

    What Indian cruise missile are you talking about ? If its the Brahmos I doubt its length would mean none of the MRCA contenders will be able to carry it. Then there is the ‘Nirbhay’ which is a long way away.

    Storm Shadow with some range limitation would be ideal if typhoon is chosen. In the case of the Gripen does the Taurus come with a range limited version that complies with MTCR.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News & Discussion # 13 #2378801
    quadbike
    Participant

    [QUOTE=Tanguahka;1618018]

    There is an MRCA chart in circulation as well made by the same author i guess. If anything its worse. !

    It sure does, the question however is what changes shall we make or post, a better chart with sources may be. Just trying to say the post would look better with the right figures with sources.

    And by the way is the author of the chart listening????

    Pardon me i posted it because it looked incredibly stupid. I do not even know who the author of that chart is. But i guess people can add the right information about the respective fighters here. I see obligatory has already started.

    in reply to: C-17 crash Alaska #2378898
    quadbike
    Participant

    RIP 🙁

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion IV #2378939
    quadbike
    Participant

    Manned SEAD/DEAD is getting out of fasion faster then other AtoG.

    We don’t have any UCAVs at the moment. Su 30s with KH 31s are there though. IAI Harops are on order though.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion IV #2378954
    quadbike
    Participant

    Plus Rolls-Royce, Finmeccanica, Avio, ITP, & MTU . . . something over 100 billion Euros.

    Do you know the A2G road-map for the Typhoon. It is going to be important for the IAF if the type is selected for it to have good A2G capabilities (at least in future).

    Can it designate its own LGBs ? What about GPS guided munitons, Anti Radiation missiles (the ALARM is not on sale is it), Anti Ship Missiles ( ? )

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion IV #2378990
    quadbike
    Participant

    Earlier you were certain that Mig 35 made it at Leh. What makes you think it didnt?

    So who´s

    • Lowest bidder of Gripen NG, EF, and F-18?
    • the best TOT suit.
    • the “top strategic gain”?

    EF seems to be a dark horse that i never really thought as a winner here, mostly due to its price and lack of upgrades/development in its home countries..

    My assumption was based on the fact that MIG 29s of IAF have no problems in Leh. MIG 35 has higher thrust engines and hence should not have any problems clearing the trials.

    Oh and my 3 shortlist comprising of Gripen, Super Hornet and Typhoon is based on the general mood of the PR guys in respective firms. Typhoon guys seem to be the most confident at this stage saying 60% chance of winning the deal, while SAAB executives are also certain their AC will make it to the next round. There is less noise coming from Dassault and LM (LM is even talking about selling F 35 to navy rather than abt F 16IN)

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News & Discussion # 13 #2379003
    quadbike
    Participant

    There is an MRCA chart in circulation as well made by the same author i guess. If anything its worse. !

    http://a.imageshack.us/img43/4332/mmrca.png

    quadbike
    Participant

    F 35 is a Strike Fighter. With Emphasis on Strike, still more capable in A2A than F 16s. A good compromise in todays world.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News & Discussion # 13 #2379350
    quadbike
    Participant

    Atleast Its neatly presented. That chart…..

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion IV #2379459
    quadbike
    Participant

    I wonder how short the short list is ? 4 or 3 ? Ideally should be 3 as there are originally six bidders.

    My guess on ones who bit the dust.

    Rafale, F 16 and MIG 35

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion IV #2379506
    quadbike
    Participant

    The news is said to be good by whom? Leaked IAF reaction?

    Probably indication that it has made the shortlist.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,206 through 2,220 (of 3,473 total)