dark light

quadbike

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,166 through 3,180 (of 3,473 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Stealth, what is it worth? #2426939
    quadbike
    Participant

    I was talking to Wrightwing 🙂

    in reply to: Stealth, what is it worth? #2427017
    quadbike
    Participant

    Wrightwing, let go man.

    flex, while is well opined in many a thing has this legendary hatred against F 22 (its part of forum folklore)

    &

    Over G hates the word stealth and thinks he knows better than the USAF/LM and countless others. (F 117 being stealthier than F 22 cracked me up)

    You are basically talking back to a radio with these guys.

    in reply to: Stealth, what is it worth? #2427217
    quadbike
    Participant

    for some people. stealth will only make sense when their country has it

    It only makes sense when their country makes it. 😉

    Hence the F 35 bashing by Brits and other Euros who may be getting it.

    in reply to: Indian Navy News and Discussions #2012693
    quadbike
    Participant

    I think the Navy should do an outright purchase of 6 subs from a European Shipyard to Augement the locally license built ones.

    in reply to: Romania may go for "free" F-16? #2427495
    quadbike
    Participant

    but if you buy Gripen C/Ds then you need to get western weapons like the AMRAAM, Iris-T, AGM 65-Maverick and AIM-9. the ex-Soviet weapons won’t work on them. so you will need to get NATO pylons to get those Gripen C/Ds. the existing stockpile of Soviet weapons won’t work on the Gripen unless Romania pays for integration and that would be a lot more than purchasing NATO pylons..

    the MiG-21 Lancer with the upgrade can still use whatever weapons it used before upgrade, so there was no need for NATO pylons- the same is true for other Eastern Euro nations that use MiG-29s modified to be NATO compatible.

    I do not think any Soviet/Russian aircraft are an option for Romania at the moment. It is between the F 16 and Gripen. Gripen A/B (inspite of not having NATO pylons) operates western weapons like Amraam and Sidewinder. U don’t need ‘NATO’ pylons to operate these weapons with Gripen A/B. A limited upgrade would make them compatible with NATO operational standards (hell they could even do that with MIG 29).

    I really do not see the point you are trying to make here

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part Deux #2427497
    quadbike
    Participant

    Russians sure love their teal coloured cockpits.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News from around the world -IV #2427538
    quadbike
    Participant

    It has even rescued Chinooks in the past. There are pictures on the net of the same.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2427545
    quadbike
    Participant

    From an insider:
    “It is quite an ordinary plane, there aren’t any super-incredible solutions or some incredible shapes. And the cockpit inside is almost like of Su-35. The plane is not a product of the very modern ages …. the project has been elaborated with giving attention to some modern stuff, thats all. The project itself leaks from quite distant times.”
    And yes, it will have IRST.

    I will be very disappointed if this is so. If it is not at-least as stealthy as the F 35 India should seriously reconsider ordering it in numbers.

    in reply to: F-22 Raptor & F-35 JSF? #2427873
    quadbike
    Participant

    next argument to be based on who represents the mule and who represents the human child.

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (X) – Flamers NOT Welcome at all #2428113
    quadbike
    Participant

    err, what does this sentence mean ? please rephrase.

    The G limits reached by Tejas as opposed to designed limit. 😉

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (X) – Flamers NOT Welcome at all #2428123
    quadbike
    Participant

    ASR limit reached is 8G, whereas design limit is 9G.

    Can you give me a source on this. It is still at 6.5gs i think reached limit.

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (X) – Flamers NOT Welcome at all #2428183
    quadbike
    Participant

    Ante_climax, the gist of your posts don’t seem to have changed much.

    Please stop name calling and conspiracy theories.

    Is it not within the realms of possibility that two people share some thoughts.

    :rolleyes:

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (X) – Flamers NOT Welcome at all #2428196
    quadbike
    Participant

    I think that India needs some strategic ties to accelerate its programme & I suggest:-

    RR+Bae for Adour 821, more Hawk, Ej for LCA & also Kaveri-2 (and not with snecma)

    EADS + BAe for LCA, NLCA, UCAV, MCA

    I prefer RR + EJ combine for Kaveri-2 as they already have a 90kn engine which can grow to 105-120kn and also TVC unlike Snecma

    Honeywell F 125 for Jaguar

    T 50 Golden Eagle for AJT

    GE F 414 for LCA engine.

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (X) – Flamers NOT Welcome at all #2428197
    quadbike
    Participant

    will be done during FOC. what the Vayu article said is that by December 2009 after the sea-level trials in Goa, the IOC flight enveloped would be cleared for service entry..

    Vayu article image

    image courtesy of Karan at BRF.

    Good to Know 😀

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (X) – Flamers NOT Welcome at all #2428265
    quadbike
    Participant

    with the full envelope opened up for IOC this year in December at Dabolim, Goa.

    Was the designed G limit reached. If so please give a link to show that.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,166 through 3,180 (of 3,473 total)