dark light

quadbike

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 3,473 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2371800
    quadbike
    Participant

    http://livefist.blogspot.com/2009/10/vishnu-som-update-on-boeing-super.html

    Acc to Vishnu Som Boeing told him that.

    Boeing says it WILL offer the Indian Air Force an out and out 9G fighter — this has been a promise made by the Boeing team. I was led to believe this involves changes in the flight control system, though the airframe itself is OK for 9G.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2371808
    quadbike
    Participant

    You are forgetting that the whole tender does not have to change for the IAF to decide on what missions the helicopters are to be used for.

    The Chinook for example is an excellent bird for CSAR as demonstrated in Afghanistan.

    In the end the only reason the Chinook could win over the Mi 26T2 will be its versatility and capabilities including CSAR, for if its just Heavy Lift the Mi 26T2 should win hands down, which mark my words it won’t.

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2371824
    quadbike
    Participant

    Nope. Unfortunately for the 7.5g Super Hornet, it performed poorly in the technical trials, so. Even if those benefits did play into it’s favour (which I very much doubted anyway), India would have been stuck with an aircraft that didn’t meet it’s requirements.

    What 7.5 G super hornet there was a Boeing statement saying that the Super Hornet is a 9G airframe only limited to 7.5G for USN and that the Indian one will be a 9G fighter?

    You are right its all technical and performance oriented and this is why I think strategy/politics won’t matter at the end either.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2371854
    quadbike
    Participant

    How is this contradictory to the other article ?

    Look at the date May 2009. The article I posted was from April of this year.

    He states it has been broken down into two components. Quite possible again.

    Please don’t post generic articles which predate this one, I cannot find the current status of the tender, if you want to disprove Sengupta you have to post something which refutes his claim.

    We will know soon enough as one is selected.

    And 6+10 is not 24 as u claimed the 9 are CSAR options according to him, which again makes sense as its in the nature of the IAF to leave an option for purchase.

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2371875
    quadbike
    Participant

    I don’t believe for a moment political and especially strategic benefits will be ignored. Those as well as industrial benefits are a huge part of this Indian tender. The latter two are what India very much needs to help boost their aerospace industry and security to India and it’s people, too. Political benefits are also important for India.

    If this was the case the Super Hornet would have won this.

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2371901
    quadbike
    Participant

    Was not the Dassault guy a bit iffy about the offsets saying he just want to be chosen first & will then discuss. While the EF guy sounded confident about offsets.

    At the time I thought that Rafale had to be cheaper by a fair amount.

    Bring back Gripen 🙁

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread V #2371907
    quadbike
    Participant

    Typhoon & Rafale fans agreeing on things.

    Has the world gone sensible ?

    India & Pakistan to bury the hatchet next ?

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2371912
    quadbike
    Participant

    U.S.S when you refute some one you have to provide a source of your own that is all i have said.

    He was not just asking TR1 he was also taking a dig at me because I posted Mr.Sengupta.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2371936
    quadbike
    Participant

    His choice of sources, however, is not restricted to Janes. He has often used the info from sales brochure of other manufacturers to describe the features of indigenous products.

    I was merely asking boom for sources to disprove him. I googled and could not find any, infact the most information I have about the tender is that article. There is nothing in Force/India-Strategic or any other defense mags regarding it but for that one article.

    If some one is refuting a source he has the responsibility to show evidence.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2371943
    quadbike
    Participant

    How would you know form that pic

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2371952
    quadbike
    Participant

    I am not a fan of Mr Sengupta. He has even stolen from our very own Scorpion82, still far more credible than ‘Boom’.

    At-least because he is copying from such sources as Janes.

    Each to his own.

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2371958
    quadbike
    Participant

    As things look it looks like Eurofighter. If the Rafale is not significantly cheaper they cannot compete on offsets.

    My least favourite winning 🙁

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2371969
    quadbike
    Participant

    because they have to compete. there’s no other Mi-26 class helicopter in the world. Chinnook is the next closest.

    What about the Ch 53

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2371977
    quadbike
    Participant

    What difference does it make? There are quite a lot of Blogs, Websites and news channels which only publish and broadcast only bull**it. Owning a blog or newspaper opinion slot doesn’t give you credibility.

    BR has a lot of members who make more sense than many of these Bloggers, who seems to parroting corporate statements and advertisements with some news thrown in.

    Yes they do but the majority is not.

    It does give you more credibility than having a user id on a forum.

    For example if you are doing research you can cite a magazine, journal or news channel, you can never cite a forum.

    😉

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2372067
    quadbike
    Participant

    disprove it ? :rolleyes: just look at the gazillion of reports on the net on the heavy lift chopper tender.

    force, also known as farce is hardly a reputed defence mag. who asked you to take my word for it ? I believe google is not blocked at your place ?
    a lot ? more like none.

    How many articles, magazines have you published ?

    You are an amateur you can call Force or Mr Gupta anything you want, but you won’t be taken seriously till you are a credible source yourself or can quote credible sources.

    😉

    You discredit Mr Aroor, Sengupta, Col Shukla all based on what ? Because you are a member of a fantasy nationalist forum called BR ? :rolleyes:

Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 3,473 total)