dark light

quadbike

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 826 through 840 (of 3,473 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2033878
    quadbike
    Participant

    That’s a gross simplification, and not true in even the majority of cases. The whole “backwards Soviet” horde thing is 80% Cold War nonsense. It can’t be applied across the board.

    Not non-sense at all its actually a post cold-war realisation after Soviet equipment increasingly came into western hands (through former soviet republics and sattelite states). The Russians relied on higher numbers and less sophisticated technology and individual elements had much less capability than their western counterparts, the US/German evaluation comparing the MiG 29 and F 16 found out that the MIG was best used alongside GCI as part of a system while the F 16 could do a better job on its own. Communism transfering down to operational level basically, everything is done as a group with little impetus on individual assets.

    Post Cold War Russia is changing, to prove my point look at the proposed changes for the Russian armed forces ! cutting numbers and keeping a smaller highly efficient force in the Army. Cutting the number of aircraft while concentrating on highly capable platforms like the Su 34,Su 35 and in future T-50.

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2033890
    quadbike
    Participant

    ^Russian electronics in early 2000s isn’t exactly something to boast of… And TR category is so large we can compare and counter with examples.

    And I think plan does need more MPAs — maybe surface sureillance can be done through OTH and increasingly UAVs, but their ASW desperately needs augmentation.

    I don’t think ie is “jealous” plan doesn’t have a plane like the p-8… Putting it another way, I wonder what his opinion would be if PLAN got a similar deal as what IN is getting now?

    I honestly think its a case of sour grapes. The restrictions have certainly helped in the development of Chinese defense industry but the point is they don’t have anything comparable and don’t have the option to purchase it.

    Capability is capability whether purchased or developed in house. This point seems to be lost on certain people.

    Now they may not ‘need’ it simply because they cannot have it, that does not meen the p 8 -i is useless as he says. IMO it was always intended to work as part of a wider system with in the IN and thus carries IN specefic datalinks and equipment.

    Another strategic aspect of this deal is the convergence of U.S and Indian naval interests in the IOR. Compared to the Army and Airforce of the two countries the Navies co-operate a lot more and are involved in various exercises. I for one will not be surprised if the P8I in future will end up as just one of the cogs in an Indo-US strategic Bulwark against the PLAN in IOR. 😉

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2033893
    quadbike
    Participant

    The fact is, China has, or can have if it wants to, a far bigger MPA fleet than the Indian Navy ever will. They have enough viable platforms, and while they may be inferior to the P-8 in terms of sensor suite, but they will be good enough for the PLAN’s strategic needs. Indeed, you’d be surprised at how advanced Chinese military electronics seem to be getting these days; in many aspects they’re already close to the level Russia had in the 90s and early 00s.

    Because they have more money and a better domestic aviation industry. But that does not mean it to be superior, during the cold war soviets always had bigger numbers compared to western Europe, but their weapons were inferior in a technological point of view and am sure if ever a war broke out it would have shown on the exchange ratios.

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2033932
    quadbike
    Participant

    why would I be envious of some thing that I think is essentially a waste of money.

    and I am serious here,
    P-8 is intended to work with BAMS, that was always the original intent.
    BAMS aspect is taking away the persistence survallence part from P-8, which is kind absurd because P-8’s platform is not exactly ideal for low altitude ASW work either. If any of you have flown in a 737-800 in a low speed low altitude turbulence you would know what i mean. hence the gadgetary designed to dispense torpedos and sonarbuoys. Will IN buy BAMs and dispensers? haven’t heard.

    now If I am given the choice, I would use it to buy the maritime survallence radar and EW equipment and do my own installations on some low hour 2nd hand freighter, given the industrial base that we have in India. may be I can get more airframes and strength out of that. ( a low hour 737 LR cost what, 60 mil on the 2nd hand market, and no worries on somebody to bug you because everything is done inhouse?) but no… instead you got to send the comm gear etc etc for Boeing to “install/integrate”…
    so every time one of those P-8I took off, some body some where half way across the world would know exactly where its at and what its doing, and may be tip off PakN if it strayed too close. 😉

    Please watch the P 8-I videos India is gettin dispensers and all that. And these guys making decisions are not amateurs like yourself.

    As for the integration its already done and it makes little sense to do it all in house for such a small number of airframes. Do you think an aircraft or an airforce is not potent because the equipment is not integrated ormade in the home country.

    Those Ships/Subs will be done for whether its American weapons or Indian 😉

    You are apparently Jealous because China does not have something of the same class and cannot buy it from anywhere because of restrictions and because Russian don’t have anything similar.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2313636
    quadbike
    Participant

    Russian weapons are too big compared to western counterparts, smaller bay is fine as long as they can develop smaller weapons.

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2033999
    quadbike
    Participant

    as such I don’t think they are more effective than your regular airliners with a big radar.

    haha 🙂 Envious are we ?

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2034299
    quadbike
    Participant

    Saab’s Official Brief To Indian Navy On Sea Gripen

    Saab made this presentation to the Indian Navy on September 6 in Goa during the INS Hansa golden jubilee event. This is exclusive to Livefist.

    As its exclusive not posting the slides. Let him get some hits :diablo:

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread V #2314554
    quadbike
    Participant

    I think I would rather have the Rafale. Don’t want PAF Falcons owning IAF typhoons.

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2315161
    quadbike
    Participant

    Plane without an Engine nice ! Surely then the 65 million can’t be ‘fly away’ price. :diablo:

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2315165
    quadbike
    Participant

    If India is getting some autonomy (ie Source Codes etc) the Indian version can have smaller western munitions 🙂

    in reply to: PLAAF Thread 15 #2315169
    quadbike
    Participant

    My thoughts exactly…

    Looks like a C-17 than anything else…

    If Boeing sues them. They won’t allow its sale in Germany 😉

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2315173
    quadbike
    Participant

    Well it’s a compromise when you’re facing with Political situation that’s hostile with outright privatization of government entities. Some country facing with only limited number of Defense Industry that, politically the Politician want’s them all still on the hand of Government control.

    Made them transparent and responsible to market economy while still under Government control is not the most ideal way, but again it’s a compromise.

    Sadly Nehruvian Socialism still dominates large sections of the Indian society 😡

    It would atleast help to have one or two PSUs competing each other for contracts and delivery. Like the design buraeus Soviets had.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2315249
    quadbike
    Participant

    I want stealthy exhausts and single piece canopy 🙁 Not happening I know.

    May be in the AMCA 🙂

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2315251
    quadbike
    Participant

    Careful, quadbike. Aside from the criticism your post is likely to face from members here I’ll point out that some degree of government involvement in at least some Indian fields is essential from a price regulation/infrastructure POV. Defence as well; not everything can be contracted to the Tatas and Birlas.

    Also remember what happened to the NDA’s Ministry of Disinvestment?;) Despite our PM’s reformist credentials his government is just as Socialist as it is reformist; if they are willing to pump in Rs3000cr per year of taxpayer money for 10 years to keep Air India alive they’ll only think of privatizing their Defence PSUs(which make huge profits owing to their monopolly and funnel that money back into the Union Government) when pigs fly.:D

    Thats a weird bit of economics, HAL has its operational costs as well which has to be covered from its profits. And National Security should not be decided as such as which path keeps more money in the government coffers. Private companies would look for profit but they will be more efficient and will deliver products on time. All of which inturn will mean self-sufficiency, ain’t it better to buy from the Tatas & Birlas than the Sukhois & Lockheeds ? Atleast the govt will have control over the technology developted.

    What is needed is government regulation and not involvement.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2315442
    quadbike
    Participant

    Russia really need a smaller fifth gen bomb truck as well it seems. May be by mig

Viewing 15 posts - 826 through 840 (of 3,473 total)