dark light

TR1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 7,096 through 7,110 (of 9,195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2325228
    TR1
    Participant

    so how many Mi-28 and Ka-52’s did Russia order for each?

    More than enough.

    If I had a penny for every time I had to answer that…:p

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2325377
    TR1
    Participant

    In Georgia it was used purely as gunship, and as far as I am aware in almost every post-Soviet conflict Russia was in. Mi-8 was escorted by Mi-24 for transport purposes.

    What I find strange is the necessity of introducing a THIRD type of attack helo for operations, when you already have the two main birds, Ka-52 and Mi-28. Ok ok, its not completely new type, but when legacy Mi-24 is phased out, you will have to train pilots for Mi-35M. It can’t be a story of falling numbers – if we look at Mi-28 and Ka-52 production it is on a very good pace (and increasing), and with the total numbers ordered, the one thing the RuAF will NOT be lacking this decade is new attack helos. Why the sudden need for such huge attack helo numbers in such a short time frame?

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2325466
    TR1
    Participant
    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2325477
    TR1
    Participant

    The Mi-35M is a combat transport helicopter. It has its own niche that neither the Mi-17/8 nor the Mi-28/Ka-52 can fill on their own.:D

    How often is it used for combat transport in the Russian Army though, practically? Not much as far as I am aware, unless they intend to change that all of a sudden.

    Re: D30FM6, how long can the higher temperature be safely employed?

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2325818
    TR1
    Participant

    Excellent, than you!

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2325822
    TR1
    Participant

    http://pics.livejournal.com/igor113/pic/0044qf83
    http://pics.livejournal.com/igor113/pic/0044pk7q

    Damn! As close as I have come to seeing the cockpit of a MiG-31BM. This photo was taken @ MAKS 2009, check out the guys blog, lots of nice photos, high res.

    Also the blog indicates the thrust of the engines (D-30F-6M) is 16,500Kg, I was not aware the type was getting improved engines?

    EDIT: Apparently the cockpit is installed with the same kind of MDFs as the MIG-29SMT, one for the pilot (none before) and 3 in the back, I guess replacing the legacy radar displays.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2325848
    TR1
    Participant
    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2325942
    TR1
    Participant

    http://www.militaryparitet.com/teletype/data/ic_teletype/12743/

    MOD intends to acquire 8 Be-200, deliveries to begin around 2013-2014.

    http://www.militaryparitet.com/teletype/data/ic_teletype/12734/

    According to the General Designer of Antonov, Ukraine is not funding its portion of the An-70 program. He says they are working closely with Russia, including on the issue of defense, cooperation is close with UAC, and firm contracts exist with Russian MOD. However problems with the Ukrainian side and funding exist.

    http://www.vz.ru/news/2011/11/18/539700.html

    Serdykov announced that on a recent trip to Rostvertol, they agreed to a further delivery of Mi-35M helicopters. Presumably, this is on top of the current order of 22 airframes. I don’t understand why they could possibly need more attack helos given the other two types in production.

    in reply to: If India chooses Typhoon.. what would Brasil do? #2326075
    TR1
    Participant

    Yeah sorry, I wasn’t implicating you in that.

    in reply to: If India chooses Typhoon.. what would Brasil do? #2326080
    TR1
    Participant

    Please don’t rate India as a future super-power. India has a long way to go and a lot of people to lift out of poverty as has Brazil, China is at-least on-track.

    I think Brazil should opt for the platform which gives the the most ToT, exactly because of the things you mentioned.

    In terms of military power, both regional and projection, India is, and will be light years ahead of Brazil in the near and foreseeable future.

    Brazil being a future superpower, call me a skeptic.

    in reply to: Russian Civil Aviation #560377
    TR1
    Participant

    http://russianplanes.net/REGS/RA-96104

    Check out the new Il-96-400T intended for Polet.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2326093
    TR1
    Participant

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to59000/058791.jpg
    http://russianplanes.net/images/to59000/058775.jpg

    Mi-35M intended for Russia. 😮
    Will soon be in the new grey scheme!

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2326749
    TR1
    Participant

    The Su-30SM for the Navy would not be going to carrier operations. They are Su-24 replacements for shore units, apparently these would go to the Black Sea Fleet, which has old series Su-24s.

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2030119
    TR1
    Participant

    http://militaryrussia.ru/i/284/368/IrN90.jpg

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2326896
    TR1
    Participant

    http://www.militaryparitet.com/teletype/data/ic_teletype/12706/

    Zelin:

    «Первоначально планируется закупить 28 Су-30СМ, однако это число не окончательное, в будущем их количество может быть увеличено. Первые две машины должны поступить в войска уже в 2012 году», – отметил он.

    “Initially it is planned to purchase 28 Su-30SM, however this number is not final, in the future this number may be increased. First 2 machines should enter service already in 2012.”

    Now, it could be this is about the potential option for 12 more SMs for the Navy, but I am getting the feeling there will be more birds ordered for the AF as well.

Viewing 15 posts - 7,096 through 7,110 (of 9,195 total)