dark light

TR1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 7,081 through 7,095 (of 9,195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2029886
    TR1
    Participant

    http://rusnavy.com/news/navy/index.php?ELEMENT_ID=13653

    I wonder if this is Ukraine’s reply for the Russian Navy’s unwillingness to get its ships repaired in Ukraine…

    Hmm. Maybe Russia should make an equivalent increase in energy price ? :p

    But seriously, small increase, nothing major.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2323659
    TR1
    Participant

    Do not know how it is done on D30FM6, but I pressume it could be similar to the RD-33. The RPT regime is switched ON automatically after:

    1. engine throttle at full AB
    2. total pressure inside the engine intake higher >0,7kp/cm2
    3. speed equal or above Mach1,5

    RPT is limited to 5minutes during the flight, the T4 temperature (TIT-Turbine Inlet Temperature) rises 25 degree C more. Also on the Mig-29 there is a switch hidden in left landing gear bay ground presonal has to switch ON before flight. Usually no thrust values are given(in the manuals) when RPT is engaged, bcs it is not a static thrust measured on a stand.

    Once again, thanks for being an encyclopedia Martinez!

    in reply to: super cruise info #2324529
    TR1
    Participant

    Can one thread go without X vs Y comparisons? They always just lead to flamefests.

    in reply to: Nice India SARS news and discussion thread #2324711
    TR1
    Participant

    Russia is a multicultural and ethnic nation, nothing new here.

    in reply to: Nice India SARS news and discussion thread #2324716
    TR1
    Participant

    Why, have you ever flown one?

    I might go for the Shin Meiwa and it 40 years of operational experience…

    Be-12 was used for over 40 years, and a lot more were made.

    Performance wise, I would imagine the Be-200 is clearly ahead.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2325017
    TR1
    Participant

    I am curious to see the two seat order split for the RuAF, since I presume they will order them alongside the IAF. Might as well if there is a committed partner in the variant.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2325099
    TR1
    Participant

    Otherwise, I do agree with you. Without a major re-design / change in nacelles and nozzle, T-50 will not be a full aspect stealth aircraft.

    The current engine assembly is not the final production variant.
    Come on people, how many times does that need to be said ? :p
    I mean does anyone honestly think Sukhoi tries hard on the rest of the plane, and derps out on horribly reflective engine nacelles?

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2325111
    TR1
    Participant

    Sure if they are offered money they will.

    You have any idea what kind of money would have to be offered for that? IAF’s budget isn’t endless. Further, Sukhoi is busy with PAK-FA right now, a redesign would have to wait a long ass time before appearing.

    All in all, I think the conclusion is clear. A heavy redesign, it won’t be.

    in reply to: Russian Civil Aviation #560170
    TR1
    Participant

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to59000/058833.jpg

    4th Aeroflot Superjet being painted.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2029974
    TR1
    Participant
    in reply to: Indian Missiles News #1795630
    TR1
    Participant

    The only uncompleted 971 is the Irbis, left unfinished @ Amur. It would require a lot of work to finish, and no sign that it has been restarted.

    in reply to: super cruise info #2325139
    TR1
    Participant

    Su-35 has no proven supercruising ability despite what the Russians try to hype about it. they are trying to market it to get investments.

    .

    Please talk about subjects you know about.
    What investments? Why would Russia need investments for the Su-35?

    Su-35 has supercruised, it is well documented. They accidentally passed the sound barrier during testing without afterburner, and the plane continued accelerating according to the pilot.

    EDIT: Oh wait, this is the Chinese pilots on Kuznetsov guy, I forgot lol.

    in reply to: If India chooses Typhoon.. what would Brasil do? #2325155
    TR1
    Participant

    , GDP Per capita,

    They are almost identical.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2325158
    TR1
    Participant

    Naah. I’ll bet my hat that the FGFA will look just like the Pak-Fa, just with the two crew stations beeing the different.
    It is an riddicules notion that Sukhoi are willing to alter or re-design an almost new airframe for the IAF..

    Fantasies is what it is. Commonality would yield positive results in terms of unit and parts cost, production dates, and integration.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2325162
    TR1
    Participant

    The rationale for the Hind buy is first and foremost to use it as a trainer for the Mi-28. The seating arrangement in the Mi-28N is not conducive for training. Secondly, its for special forces insertions. There are interviews with Popovkin and other arms heads where they say this. The Hind will be around for many decades to come in small numbers. It wouldnt be surprising if they were still building the thing in 2050.

    Well, they are working on a trainer Mi-28 variant, so I still don’t understand the necessity of a further batch.

    The special forces insertion thing is interesting, since as far as I know in Russian service the transport/combat capability was not utilized at the same time. In fact I have zero specific examples of that being used, post USSR.

Viewing 15 posts - 7,081 through 7,095 (of 9,195 total)