Why would you want Chinook, Mi-26 smashes it in capability.
How many Su-24 do they have and how many will be upgraded ?
Hard to say, anywhere from 350-550 in active service, of all types. 40 Su-M2 have been upgraded by Sukhoi, and up to a dozen airframes by Gefest&T.
So how come no one has bought it so far?
Also, do you have figures, that show, that:
“The fact is that at any regime or altitude , the Rafale turns tighter than the Typhoon .”
No offense Blue but you are making a lot of hard claims, I would be very interested to see a point by point statistical backing.
Not really. I have repeatedly stated that there are advantages the Su-33 airframe has over the MiG-29K, as well as their being advantages to China using an airframe so similar to something that have experience with.
What irks me is the great lengths people go to, and elaborate OTs involved, to try to downplay the clear as day fact, that I am not going to repeat once again.
What?
can’t debate with facts so accuse the others being paid agents?
is this the best you got?
You mean facts like the J-15 is a Su-33 rip-off?
Your long tirades don’t change that, sorry pal.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LgeX7cd5-XM#!
Cool vid. Su-24 training. Nice takeoff with full burners, and buddy-buddy refueling.
According to the FT this morning, an Indian MoD official has informed them that the defence ministry revised up its initial $11bn estimate after reviewing bids from the Eurofighter Typhoon consortium and France’s Dassault, to $20bn.
Allez Eurofighter!!
Wait, 9 bn increase for the same numbers of fighters?
lol, wow.
Just forget it guys, the party pays well these days to post long long attempted explanations to try to avoid the basic reality.
If China came at this with such a fresh angle, and the project involved sooo much indigenous engineering prowess that the Su-33 offered barely any help, why not navalize one of the domesticated J-11Bs? But instead, they acquired a Su-33, and the J-15 magically looks almost identical. Hmmm….
Looks like it has no problem with heavy external stores for multirole missions.
When are second hand A380s expected to be available?
I am not too familiar with airline airplane cycles.
Right, but it would make more sense to adopt similar policy to MKI right now, and buy license for partially indigenous production (of an advanced variant maybe, 117S or something), than waste time and money on complete domestic production, assuming Saturn is even ok with it.
Somehow I suspect making the entire process in house would be economically stupid.
Actually, a decent question Jo. I wonder how much in-house Al-31 production is costing India, per unit.
PLAN went to Russia to negotiate a Su-33 buy with technical brief for domestic production line. Russia refused (or can not agree to a term).
your #1 export customer wants to ensure stability and security of their supply chain. you can not garantee that.
what do you expect happen in case of a customer with other options….it will pursue other options.Rookh’s post above may shed some insight into this question too.
….
I think Russian Aerospace companies and PLA Staff both need to change their mind set.
If Russia were to become a stable supplier and fully involved in chinese domestic arms acquisition chain, it must shown reliability.
something close to how Nato internally procure amongst its allies.
Wow, more justifications for theft of the design. Absurd.
You are totally right, Russia should just expect China to steal the design if it is not willing to export it. Totally cool.
China wanted several Su-33s for obvious reasons. Russia was completely in its right to deny a token purchase intended to copy a design.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=mBcHPgtOAeM
Topol launch video.