48 Su-27SM in units, another 5 @ Lipetsk. 53 units total upgraded.
2 lost in service.
28 Su-30SMs for AF, 12 for VMF.
A-380 users are already selling off their aircraft?
Not somewhere, in Moscow. You can see the Indian MiG-29UPGs being worked on.
It is curious what those seemingly conserved MiG-29 airframes are from, since all of the unfinished airframes were supposedly completed.
The other plane is a Mig-AT, program is dead, hence no work on them.
http://www.armstrade.org/includes/periodics/news/2011/1101/125010199/detail.shtml
Sevmash will begin constructing two diesel boats for the VMF in March 2012.
Zero.
The overhaul is going to take 5 years, so you can bet on heavy internal reconstruction. The Granit tubes will be removed, 100%. Right decision, but I always fancied VLS buried under a carriers deck.
I hope the mighty defensive armament is not castrated though.
“
Given the fact that the use of ballistic missiles by nuclear opponents is highly destabilizing its highly probable that such missiles would not be used. “
x2.
Speaking of cruise missiles, does India have a long range terrain following unit?
Those graphs were made before the boats were even at sea, and are from the US. Take that as you will!
nice.. a LEGAL flanker copy!
Licensed production is not a copy. That is like saying Irkut made legal copies of Knaapo’s Flanker. :p
What even the GoI’s press release states clearly is that the PAK-FA as it stands doesn’t meet the IAF’s requirements of a 5th gen fighter and hence it is being modified (what modifications, not clear) to meet those more stringent requirements.
Given that the RuAF’s definitive PAK-FA standards have not been yet met, what basis is there to say the IAF’s requirements are more stringent? None. Who seriously believes PAK-FA as it is today is the final product the RuAF wants?
India may (I think very likely) be contributing funding towards system developments that are currently happening in Russia for both the RuAF and IAF definitive planes, but the fact is, the PAK-FA as of today, is a 100% Russian product. When I see actual numbers as to what system Indian money went into, then I will be happy to change that assertion.
The fact is that “5th gen” without Indian money claim is stupid and inaccurate. What futures does the IAF want, exactly, that make the plane 5th gen, and that the RuAF itself did not desire when Sukhoi won the tender back in the early 2000s?
These feel-good Indian media reports are hard to credit with much, to be frank.
It doesn’t have to be slide back anymore
Right, but since the PAK-FA’s is slide back from the start, gotta redesign that, is it worth the expense? I dont know.
EDIT: I had no idea F-35 has different canopies untill now.
http://www.tvzvezda.ru/news/forces/content/201110271012-fdrj.htm
Video of the new helos.
http://www.take-off.ru/images/stories/news-10-2011/Be-200_301_IMG_1586.jpg
The Be-200 that was delivered to the MCHS this month.
http://www.take-off.ru/news/114-news07-10-2011/593-a-50u-vvs-10-2011
The new A-50U.
Correction- India has already paid $295 million towards the PAK-FA contract. So 100% of the funding for the PAK-FA is not Russian.
That article seems to imply that money is towards the joint project based on the PAK-FA. Doesn’t disprove that PAK-FA has been funded 100% out of Russia so far.
Now this is cool, new Mi-28s in the new camo apparently adopted as the standard for the helicopter force:



and the new Mi-26s:


And is that one of the Mi-35Ms destined for the RuAF I see?

Not sure how much visibility would be gained from that one bar dissapearing.. Plus it makes the whole canopy slide back construction more complicated.