dark light

TR1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 7,726 through 7,740 (of 9,195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2315141
    TR1
    Participant

    The only weapons that might end up inside Pak-Fa might be Russian, Indian or those which are jointly developed.

    My thoughts as well. Russia may not have something like the SDB in service ATM, but there are projects of a similar class. Further a weapon that small is useless as far as India and Russia are concerned, IMO. The rest, well, equivalents exist, so no need to complicate things.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2315145
    TR1
    Participant

    What “Western” munitions would the PAK-FA need? The program covers a full spectrum of compatible weaponry. India would only be wasting time integrating 3rd party weaponry, with no gain.

    Physics exist in the mystical West as well. Won’t be getting Yakhot performance in a Kh-38 sized aiframe, period.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2034484
    TR1
    Participant
    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2315235
    TR1
    Participant

    x2 on what emile said

    The nozzles will obviously be “stealth”, been known for a long time.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2315259
    TR1
    Participant

    http://www.izvestia.ru/news/499605

    MiG-31 will be kept in service untill at least 2020. Modernization of 30 MiG-31BMs underway currently (good to get some firm numbers finally). There are 100 MiG-31s in front line service in the air force.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #14 #2315263
    TR1
    Participant
    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2315318
    TR1
    Participant

    I guess. PAK-FA is satisfying my dreams aplenty.

    Ok that sounded wrong.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2315327
    TR1
    Participant

    I am going to take a wild guess and say Sukhoi made two bays instead of 1 for a reason. Like structural integrity.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #14 #2315331
    TR1
    Participant

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to55000/054002.jpg

    “Modernized” Serbian MiG-29.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2315332
    TR1
    Participant

    ………….Did you really expect internal Yakhont?

    Come on man…

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2315334
    TR1
    Participant

    I missed it, link me to the list of munitions for it.

    Kh-38, Kh-58USHK, new Kab-250, Item K047 in development….just for starters.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2315364
    TR1
    Participant

    The idea of internal weapons bay on a Russian fighter has somewhat less utility than on a Western one because of the significantly larger size of Russian A2G missiles: the Yakhont, the Moskit, the Kh-59M and the like. Of course, the PAK-FA’s main purpose is air-to-air combat, but still I’d have liked if that gap between the air intakes was wider…:(

    Has Sukhoi explored the idea of Silent Eagle-style conformal weapons bays for the PAK-FA?

    Uhh, did you miss the new PAK-FA specific munitions shown around? You listed the very biggest ones, not to mention mostly anti ship ones, how is that at all relevent…if anything the PAK-FA program is making it clear they want full spectrum of internal A2G munition capability at service entry…unlike say, the Raptor.

    in reply to: PLAAF Thread 15 #2315404
    TR1
    Participant

    So the y-20 is another ingenious example of original Chinese domestic ability?

    Nice.:rolleyes:

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2315405
    TR1
    Participant

    Enough about the Il-476. The Russian MOD clearly sees value in the project, leave it at that.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2315754
    TR1
    Participant

    Hmm, if the way the engine bay curves up is indeed strange, sort of makes me think if that was actually the engine face, it would be at an angle? It looks flat in those photos, hard to tell though.

    Still think it is the engine though.

Viewing 15 posts - 7,726 through 7,740 (of 9,195 total)