dark light

TR1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 7,741 through 7,755 (of 9,195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MMRCA for Malaysia #2315765
    TR1
    Participant

    MKM is pretty great at anti-shipping strikes.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2316217
    TR1
    Participant

    I have repeatedly, and from the start, stated I thought the concept of the LEVCONs being used for RCS purposes is unlikely to stay polite.

    in reply to: Hot Dog Indian AF News and Discussion Part 17 #2316224
    TR1
    Participant

    Does it really matter that they did not have their armament for a year after initial delivery? Not like they were in any sort of combat role at the time. IDK, seems kinda inconsequential in the greater scheme of things.

    Also, India had problems with crappy R-77s produced in middle of 90s. I don’t think today’s variants will have any problems.

    EDIT: Also, how many Su-30’s does HAL produce yearly? Al-31s? Some recent numbers would be nice.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2316233
    TR1
    Participant

    I don’t know, I wasn’t the one who brought it up. However, since you posted a picture of a Su-34 and PAKFA, clearly you were implying something.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2316245
    TR1
    Participant

    They are both vaguely similar nacelles, pretty obvious they have vast differences though. Then again, Hotdogs trolling is nothing new.

    RE: S-duct
    IMO, it does not, I think Sukhoi has made it clear they will not be relying on a pure S-duct configuration -there may be partial blocking certainly, but that’s a result of overall scheme not an attempt to hide the engine face. Don’t ask me about the photos, I do not know whats real and what is not.

    in reply to: Russian shuttles #2316251
    TR1
    Participant

    Hmmm…seems suspicious, gonna look around regarding this….good pics though Slippery!

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2316253
    TR1
    Participant

    And what exactly does the Su-34 have to do with Pak-Fa? Aside from using vaguely similar engines at this time?

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2316256
    TR1
    Participant

    Vik delay had nothing to do with Rosboronexport….

    Sevmash was the ones who ****** up on the estimations.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2316367
    TR1
    Participant

    likely Algerian (or maybe intended for the old Libyan regime) :diablo:
    and 2011 and its still not delivered. a contract from 5 years ago..

    It is a new aircraft. New line, new tooling, what exactly did you expect?

    Weren’t you denying that Algeria was even getting Yak-130 recently?

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2316812
    TR1
    Participant

    http://www.aex.ru/multimedia/14/

    Good photos of Irkut production line, Su-30s and Yak-130s.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2316824
    TR1
    Participant
    in reply to: Military Aviation News 2011 June – #2316949
    TR1
    Participant

    They should modernise the while fleet to the Indian Baz standard I think it’s called and then apply the required nato bits and bobs.

    You mean modernize it to SMT standard.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News 2011 June – #2317058
    TR1
    Participant

    Poland Signs $44.5M Deal To Modernize MiG-29s

    It is really not much of a modernization…

    in reply to: MMRCA for Malaysia #2317064
    TR1
    Participant

    By T-50 do you mean the Golden Eagle?

    That’s quite a bit below the performance they want methinks.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2317077
    TR1
    Participant

    The LEVCONS are definitely not an intake-masking device.

Viewing 15 posts - 7,741 through 7,755 (of 9,195 total)