dark light

TR1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 8,101 through 8,115 (of 9,195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2311298
    TR1
    Participant
    in reply to: Russian Civil Aviation #476357
    TR1
    Participant

    http://nsa20.casimages.com/img/2011/05/22/110522012744564235.jpg
    http://nsa19.casimages.com/img/2011/05/22/110522012856497120.jpg

    Armavia suprjet in Marsailles.

    Apparently they are flying the plane all over the place.

    http://newaviator.livejournal.com/99180.html

    Excellent photos of Aeroflots new Superjet.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2001177
    TR1
    Participant

    Trust me, you don’t want to see Pacific Fleet 956s. Even in the pic above, one of the Sovs needs some engine repairs to be truly deploy-able. Overall shape is much better than some of the Pacific 956s though. They are in a deplorable state, aside from Bystry, which is very much active. Boyevoi is dying, Bezboyazennyi is right next to, and not doing much better, waiting for repairs. Burny might be repaired by 2013.

    Baltic Fleet has Nastoichivy and Bespokoiny, the latter needs engine change, but at least its not rusting half assembled like the Pacific Fleet ships.

    North has Rastoropnyi, under repairs that are barely moving. Admiral Ushakov is active, and the Gremyshii is moored “in reserve”, though it seems to me its been stricken from the fleet list. Supposedly was going to be dry docked in 2010, but never happened.

    All in all. Not good.

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2311840
    TR1
    Participant

    I don’t think Blitz is accusing it of being a bad design.

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2311891
    TR1
    Participant

    Are flat nozzles confirmed to be on the final product? :O

    Could you provide a source or even an official/sanctioned drawing?

    Yeah, its been around for a while, where ya been man 😉 ?

    No official drawings of the product, but we have seen Saturn patents from earlier 2d designs.

    http://www.aviaport.ru/digest/2010/04/27/194329.html

    “Двигатель первого этапа для ПАК ФА построен по вполне традиционной схеме. Он, в частности, лишен такого характерного элемента, как плоское сопло, имеющегося у конкурента нашей машины – F-22. Однако, по словам Евгения Марчукова, работы в области выхлопной системы ведутся. На этапе выпуска технической документации находятся разработки плоского сопла и реверса.”

    Yevgeni Maruchkov, big name in PAK-FA engine program, confirms it here.

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2311894
    TR1
    Participant

    I guess I don’t attribute nacelle mounted engines just to Flankers, but to each his own. Not the worst thing to look like at the end of the day 😮 . I think the look will be very different when the flat nozzles are incorporated.

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2311902
    TR1
    Participant

    How can you be so sure?India will buy 50 single seaters (PAKFA) and each at a supposed cost of 100 mn $$ , that alone makes a amount of 5 billion. How can you say that some part of it has not been paid already as development costs?

    Eventually, maybe even in near future, yes (all the flight demonstrations and all). But the development that has so far resulted in what we see in the PAK-FA, there has been no Indian money in. I am rather sure of that.

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2311904
    TR1
    Participant

    Hopefully in future they can make the underside and rear less flankeresque and more smooth.

    Aside from engines, how is it flankeresque? Engine change is a known variable in any case.

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2311910
    TR1
    Participant

    M’kay, kind of what I expected then. But to look at it in a possitive way: Sukhoi got this far on its own funds, and is still moving forward.

    Well, far from its own funds- the Russian gov has poured as much money into the project as it needs. But I agree, its not a problem so far, I would presume Indian money can only be beneficial. What I hope for is the Russian and Indian versions to be as close together as possible, with corresponding gain in speed/economy of production. Two seats aside ( RuAF will want this anyways ) I don’t think the two will have major requirement differences- aside from India potentially asking for some of its own systems being integrated.

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2312016
    TR1
    Participant

    How mouch have they cashed in yet?
    (

    Nothing.

    However it seems India is serious about putting money into the program, and Russia is keen to include India in the project. So I think Indian participation will clear up through 2012.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2312054
    TR1
    Participant

    They would have canards yes. However the Irkut guys said MOD officials were visiting them a little while ago, talk about a potential order. IDK, nothing is confirmed.

    in reply to: Hot Dog Indian AF News and Discussion Part 17 #2312056
    TR1
    Participant

    How is it a bigger investment?..6.5 to 11 billion for the MMRCA.

    That is without the potential options.

    in reply to: Hot Dog Indian AF News and Discussion Part 17 #2312149
    TR1
    Participant

    Talk about expensive. The MMRCA is all the media has been blabbering about for years, and this appears all of a sudden, with a much bigger monetary investment.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2312152
    TR1
    Participant

    Could be related to rumored Irkut Su-30 order as well.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2312456
    TR1
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 8,101 through 8,115 (of 9,195 total)