dark light

TR1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 8,266 through 8,280 (of 9,195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2004029
    TR1
    Participant

    http://www.aviaport.ru/news/2011/05/16/215570.html

    Hmm. “Russian Helicopters” states they will deliver a new naval helicopter to the VMF, under the 2011-2020 spending program. Delivery of the new ship-based helicopter is expected in 2017-2018. Aside from this, they will complete naval modification of two existing Kamov helicopters : Ka-226 and Ka-52. The naval modifications of these two will serve on new ships, including the Mistral, assuming that piece of floating **** is ever purchased.

    in reply to: Russian Civil Aviation #480796
    TR1
    Participant

    More Il-96 love. The old liveries:

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to44000/043462.jpg

    in reply to: MiG-29M/M2 for Syria? #2341611
    TR1
    Participant

    I guess with recent troubles they will be much more keen on land based AD then more airframes.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2341620
    TR1
    Participant

    Il-20, not a very common sight:
    http://russianplanes.net/images/to44000/043478.jpg

    Oh and something dear to me :
    http://russianplanes.net/images/to44000/043465.jpg

    These “mobile” command posts are very common around the smaller airfields around Russia, many former VVS. Spent quite a little bit of time over the years in one at the airfield in Barki, used mainly for aerobatics these days.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2341639
    TR1
    Participant

    A sad fate for a Su-25 carrier trainer. Though to be fair, they are at the end of their service lives anwyays, they did their duty:

    Accident:
    http://spotters.net.ua/files/images/0000013093_small.jpeg

    Today:
    http://russianplanes.net/images/to44000/043506.jpg

    EDIT:
    Related, maybe someone is interested in the hook mechanism:
    http://russianplanes.net/images/to44000/043501.jpg

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2341679
    TR1
    Participant

    You are right! I though the querry was about the fairings at the end of the stubwing!!!

    I’m awfully confused!!!

    Yes sorry for not being more clear. That little “stub” is what I am interested about, djcross’ theory may have merit.

    in reply to: MiG-29M/M2 for Syria? #2341682
    TR1
    Participant

    thank you to you, msphere and Corran, for explaining in detail and providing links on the subject.. and not resorting to name calling and assumptions like TR1 who was unable to provide info.

    I am sorry that you are still upset that multiple posters have pointed out your claims about the K being vastly different from the M are wrong.

    What name calling? You did make the J-15 for Russia thread did you not? If you don’t admit that was pure trolling, then it is hard to take you seriously as a poster.

    @ Corran: you still post on mp.net man? 🙂

    in reply to: MiG-29M/M2 for Syria? #2341699
    TR1
    Participant

    There is a lot more, but it is still the basic MiG-29. The suffixes are just added to highlight that. The “new” K/KUB are built in Nishni Novgorod for India and the most advanced land based variant is the “MiG-35”. The question is still open. Will Syria get reworked examples as ordered by Algeria and India or will Syria get new built ones from the K/KUB assembly line?! In that case they will follow the Indian navy order.

    By reworked do you mean MiG-29SMT? That is not comparable to “new-gen” MiG-29M family.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion 8 #2342986
    TR1
    Participant

    TR1 :

    The T-50 will most probably get the first look if we are ready to trust the Russian design , which in itself is not a given … :rolleyes:
    Then , electronics tricks comes into play and there … :diablo:

    Regarding jet fighters , Russia did not show anything brilliant in the last 25 years . US teens as well as European fighters of the 4th generation (Eagles , Vipers , Tornado ADVs , Hornets , M2000s) have nothing to fear from Fulcrums and SU-27 variants .
    Late SU-30 MKIs proved to be quite a fight but nothing outstanding , SU-35s are not better either .

    In the air , Typhoons and Rafales are different beasts .

    Cheers .

    Once again, you prove your nonsense fanbouysim.

    Ask the Indians how the Mirage 2000 did against the MiG-29 in mock combat.

    Bah, I am not bothering with you anymore.

    Maybe some day someone will buy your phenomenal Rafale.

    in reply to: PLAN News, Photos and Speculation #3 #2004062
    TR1
    Participant

    Please do. I can’t wait to see the 6 operational Chinese carriers at that point.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion 8 #2343064
    TR1
    Participant

    Haavarla :

    The RBE2-AA has a 50% increase in range over the Pesa (Thalés) . Do the math .
    Even if it is 180-200km , it is still beyond the Meteor range and the Rafale will get the first look on any SU bare the T-50 (?) .

    Cheers .

    Riiiight. No way the Irbis Detects the Rafale first. :rolleyes:

    T-50 against Rafale will be massacre.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion 8 #2343154
    TR1
    Participant

    And neither is the Rafale’s radar comparable with the Su-35s 🙂 .

    You don’t seem to understand. Your information about the Rafale having a smaller RCS than its 4th gen (to use Lockheed nonsense) compatriots is interesting and for the most part accurate. The conclusions you draw from that, about the Rafale and its performance relative to competitors, is what reeks of fanboyism.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion 8 #2343164
    TR1
    Participant

    Su-35. PAK-FA. J-20.

    You have no basis of comparison with J-10B either, not really Typhoon.

    You are beyond biased, and draw conclusions from laughable evidence. But I forgot, the Rafale pilots said so.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2343168
    TR1
    Participant

    http://www.aviaport.ru/digest/2011/05/12/215435.html

    ‘Russian Helicopters’ built 214 helicopters in 2010, will build 260 in 2011, and plans to build over 300 in 2012. The current portfolio is 416 airframes, not including the very large orders expected from the 2011-2020 armament plan.

    This year, they will deliver ~100 airframes to the Russian MOD. Within the 2011-2020 time frame, under the recent Gosplan, they will deliver around 1000 airframes to the RuMOD. They plan for around 120-160 airframes delivered annually to the armed forces.

    Little tidbit:

    “Д.Мантуров также отметил, что на изготовление вертолетов Ми-38 и Ка-62 будет направлено в общей сложности 12,2 млрд рублей до 2013 года.”

    😮 What sort of mistake is that?

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion 8 #2343235
    TR1
    Participant

    Also , a RBE2-AA equipped Rafale with an AtoA weapon load will always get the first active look on any potential threat aircraft and by a good margin .

    Cheers .

    Fanboy detected.

Viewing 15 posts - 8,266 through 8,280 (of 9,195 total)