dark light

TR1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 8,356 through 8,370 (of 9,195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Bin Laden Raid: Stealth Helicopter Mods? #2350667
    TR1
    Participant

    The United States should calmly suggest that future aid/military contracts would be in potential jeopardy should any of the wreckage be handed over to 3rd parties.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion 8 #2350671
    TR1
    Participant

    we are still looking for this on europhoon design , only the seize of thier IRST , or thier air intakes (not integrted to cell) alone get indications that europhoon wasn’t designed around RCS reduction!

    http://www.eurofighter.com/uploads/pics/sf_irst.jpg
    http://www.guy-sports.com/fun_pictures/c130_typhoon_close.jpg

    it doesn’t help aerodynamic agility too, with long arm canard, larger sweep delta angle and without LERX, it take Rafale 40s and 3 turns to blow the europhoon in the air, and also Rafale had to strike nuke deep penetration missions, it tells enough about stealthness..

    So Why has this Wunder-aircraft had 0.0 exports so far.

    Also your ability to tell performance from eyeballing it is impressive.

    Neither are stealth, quit snorting the marketing nonsense.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2351063
    TR1
    Participant

    Nice mack, this is a huge occasion for the RuAF.

    Does anyone know if R-77T was serially produced.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion 8 #2351088
    TR1
    Participant

    Ahh, I did not realize that. I assumed they had something similar on offer, to either Mica-IR or R-27T. Definitely an advantage of the Rafale.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion 8 #2351109
    TR1
    Participant

    Wait does the Typhoon not offer a longer ranged IR weapon? :confused:

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion 8 #2351135
    TR1
    Participant

    Out of curiosity, what is so great about Mica-IR?

    in reply to: Russian Civil Aviation #482540
    TR1
    Participant

    Great minds think alike :p

    The Jag is a gooood catch, looks like it, back when Ford wasn’t in the picture :(.

    Kind of looks like a Star Wars pod racer.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2351236
    TR1
    Participant

    I read about that, if you knew what they really sold them… a different S-300 model from what they were looking for, and the thing which entered in their hands was an old part of the radar system (not the “important” even) which was left semi abandoned in “storage” and subject to rust and others.

    Talks for Iskander are old. As far as I know, they´ve requested that, T-90, S-400 and whatever else. But that was all on “subsidies”: You Russians give us, we protect you. S-400 not ready surely, the rest, Russians apparently did not acepted.

    Good, no free ride for Luka.

    Hmm, so the S-300V sale was similar to the Kh-31 one I guess, where the missiles were barely functional lol.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2351272
    TR1
    Participant

    I hadn’t read that thread in over a few hours, but I might have guessed that it was a fake or something (I wouldn’t have thought that Belarus would ever have taken delivery of a “post 1991” system anyway). But hasn’t Belarus supplied S-300 systems and MiG-29s to America before?

    I don’t know. I do know that Almaz sold a complete S-300V set to the US back in the 90s- handing over a system to the enemy in the process, but securing the company at a time when it realistically could have dissapeared. They used money to develop S-300VM, S-300V4, etc (and pay scientists who at the time often were not paid for months). Funny how the world works…

    Also, the article mentioned Belorussia is interested in the Iskander. Hope those bums pay for it all.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2351275
    TR1
    Participant

    lol no problem pm3, I did not actually have you in mind :p. I would be very happy to see MiG-35 enter service in Belorussia, perfect aircraft for them, maybe the reports for a Russian MOD order of 20-30 units is not fairy tales either. With those two sales MiG-35 would have somewhat secure future and more export possibilities; when we consider MiG-29K orders MiG would seem to be secure financially, though you never can tell- even today they have multi billion dollar backlog, yet have some tiny ten million dollar debt that causes problems?

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2351291
    TR1
    Participant

    So that the Belarusians can sell an example each to the Americans like that TOR M1 missile system every one’s talking about.:diablo:

    http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?197677-Russian-Tor-M1-in-America

    Read the thread. It is a fake.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2351320
    TR1
    Participant

    Белорусские Вооруженные силы намерены закупить российские самолеты типа МиГ-35 или Су-30, заявил председатель Государственного военно-промышленного комитета Белоруссии Сергей Гурулев.

    “В планах, насколько я знаю, есть поставка и самолетов типа МиГ-35 или Су-30”, — приводит слова господина Гурудева РИА “Новости”. Он также сообщил, что белорусские военные в соответствии с Программой вооружения планируют закупить российские ракетные комплексы типа “Искандер”.

    Well well well. Looks like the experts here were wrong. Belorussia is looking at either MiG-35 or Su-30.

    in reply to: Russian Civil Aviation #482548
    TR1
    Participant

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to43000/042348.jpg

    It looks like a sports car.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2351323
    TR1
    Participant

    Interesting pod.
    http://russianplanes.net/images/to43000/042529.jpg

    Il-476 flight tests will start in 2012. Not exactly the biggest priority program.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2351338
    TR1
    Participant

    Very nice, the best Flanker ever.

Viewing 15 posts - 8,356 through 8,370 (of 9,195 total)