dark light

TR1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 8,446 through 8,460 (of 9,195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2005701
    TR1
    Participant

    http://i052.radikal.ru/1104/1b/d51e6374f9ddt.jpg
    http://s007.radikal.ru/i300/1104/f7/a768ada9de78.jpg
    Admiral Gorshkov.

    http://s59.radikal.ru/i163/1104/f9/cdaa234e5420.jpg

    Soobrazitelny.

    http://balancer.ru/forum/punbb/attachment.php?item=219690&download=1

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2359223
    TR1
    Participant

    If they were EW antenna, they were the same thing.

    There’s also a Su-30 MKI EW upgrade planned, but I don’t know whether there is enough space inside the aircraft to include a comprehensive system. It may continue to rely on pods, albeit powerful and hence quite capable ones. Per public info, DARE is working on a variety of EW fits, including podded ones & towed decoys.

    http://www.ntv.ru/peredacha/smotr/

    Teer, check out the first part of this vid. Really good shots of Mi-29UPG, including new EW systems.

    Thanks to mack8 for finding this!

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2359225
    TR1
    Participant

    Indian Mig-29UPG on SMOTR ( first part of the video ).:)
    http://www.ntv.ru/peredacha/smotr/

    Good find. That Hump is a sight to behold.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2359228
    TR1
    Participant

    Somehow I don’t think you would have these doubts if the results were opposite :p

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2359305
    TR1
    Participant

    Mi-28NE vs Apache AH-64D in the Indian tender:
    http://www.defenseworld.net/go/defensenews.jsp?id=5586

    Though the Mi-28, has some problems with the radar installation at the moment.

    I don’t see the Mi-28 winning this, it will be an excellent product when they have everything ironed out this decade, but the Apache is on another level of maturity.

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2359306
    TR1
    Participant

    TR1, I have an image file someplace, will have to dig the link up – I did have it a couple of days back.

    The layout is straightforward, you have multiple receivers covering 360 degrees which act as an input to the unified exciter, receiver, processor which is the “brains” of the outfit and contains all the software and critical algorithms, allowing it to sample the input, digitize it, apply the relevant EW technique, and then send it to the transmitters. The system contains DRFM as well to help it achieve its tasks.

    These systems are from DARE (DRDO) which is the EW (airborne) specialist and its local partners. The Tx (Transmit) chain is linked to three Active Array Units, two of these cover the front and aft and the last covers the back of the aircraft. Basically, you have substantial coverage, far more than the usual jammer. These are in turn linked to their main control & power units, basically a couple of solid state transmit and receive units.

    A variant of this layout is on the LCA as well. Due to weight/volume constraints it relies on conventional tx chain, but which are reasonably capable and multiband. Again, the architecture is the same, multiple receivers, including high accuracy direction finders, feeding the input to a central processor, and from then to the respective tx modules and antenna.

    Hope this helps.

    Thank you for your response.

    We already saw some new EW protrusions on the MiG-29UPG platform when the pics surfaced a few months ago- I assumed this was a new Russian/Indian/whatever system. Are you talking about the same thing?

    -TR1

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2359576
    TR1
    Participant

    The AF also hedged against the one-seat layout of the Ka-50. Revolutionary, but risky.

    Thankfully they ordered completion of both the Ka-52 and Mi-28N programs, maybe a definitive answer will be achievable this decade, over who is better.

    Kamov fanboi here.

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 4 #2359636
    TR1
    Participant

    From the rear, the PAK-Fa is certainly more “all engine” than either the Raptor or the J-20.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2359671
    TR1
    Participant

    I awlways thought the Ka-50/52s rotor system was indeed LESS vulnerable to ground fire. Many Mi-24s were lost when tail rotor boom gets shot up, link severed, chopper spins outta control. That can’t happen in a Kamov.

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2359817
    TR1
    Participant

    MiG-29 Upgrade – it’ll have a brand new Indian EW suite with AESA jammers, developed with help from a foreign partner, tied to a Indian developed central receiver/ processor & signal generator w/DRFM, able to handle multiple threats.

    Out of curiosity, you got any links about this?

    -Thanks!

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #14 #2359840
    TR1
    Participant

    Uzbekistan Su-27:

    http://forums.airforce.ru/attachment.php?attachmentid=30864&d=1302933493
    http://forums.airforce.ru/attachment.php?attachmentid=30865&d=1302933493

    in reply to: Kazakhstan Air Force in 2020 #2359842
    TR1
    Participant

    I am not sure what being friendly to Israel really has to do with Su-30MKI. The several Israeli systems on it are easily replaced by Russian (or French, Swedish, whatever) equivalents, as seen on Su-30MKM.

    Also they have had problems with recent Israeli upgrades, not sure if they have been resolved.

    Given the sensibility and likeliness of very close relations to Russia through the next decade, just go the PAK-FA route post 2020.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2360250
    TR1
    Participant

    Not true at all. Ka-50 was sent to do work in Chechnya, so it is more proven in that respect than the Mi-28.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2360305
    TR1
    Participant

    Ka-52, pre-serial.

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to42000/041464.jpg

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2005855
    TR1
    Participant

    Where do u find the space for it to the 971?I think Oscar’s size is due to carrying that missile

    Not Granit, Granat. 😉

Viewing 15 posts - 8,446 through 8,460 (of 9,195 total)