dark light

TR1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 8,671 through 8,685 (of 9,195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2342444
    TR1
    Participant

    The Su-30MKI makes no sense for the RuAF. They already operate the Su-27SM, Su-30M2, Su-34 and Su-35S. Btw does anyone know about the state of the remaining 4 or so Su-30s?

    The older ones? There are 5 at Lipetsk.

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2342447
    TR1
    Participant

    The Rafale will be too weak in a2a. The radar is too small and has a too short range; Meteor will be limited du to lack of two-way data link; RCS is too big due to the non-canted radar and the refueling probe.

    You are some kind of insider right? I mean you know Rafale’s a2a performance and RCS with such certainty you can accurately compare it to your beloved Gripen.

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2342451
    TR1
    Participant

    Judging a fighter on weight is flawed, and even more flawed if you come to the conclusion heavier=better

    Hurricane was heavier than Spitfire, but was it the better fighter ?
    P-47 was twice as heavy as P-51, but was it a better fighter ?

    I’ve already addressed the p-47/p-51 thing, but either way, really, WW2 fighters are completely irrelevant in this discussion.

    in reply to: Russian Civil Aviation #499583
    TR1
    Participant

    Looks lovely:

    http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4147/5432670257_2f83e9d7e9_b.jpg

    http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4080/5432670263_ec26ae4ff4_b.jpg

    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5217/5432670271_030cd3766b_b.jpg

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2343118
    TR1
    Participant

    I’ve not read anything to indicate they’d be any different?

    Anyway, the Mi-28N crash is sad news – any idea of the name of the deceased, and the identity of the aircraft?

    Re: Su-27SM: Neither have I , but the idea was floated by a number of posters around the intrawebs. I believe it has merit considering Su-27SM improved (engines for one, AL-31MF1 was not around in the first examples) during the production for the first two polks, and generally that has been the trend with recent Russian aviation (Su-34 gets slightly improved with every batch). Of course, the change could be non-existant or some small software thing. I am hoping for new radar, after all these are not “upgrades” of old airframes.

    Re: Mi-28.
    http://russianplanes.net/ID36977 The aircraft.
    RIP to the commander 🙁 . At least the other crew member did not suffer serious injuries.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force- News & D iscussion #15 #2343237
    TR1
    Participant

    On the Su 30 Canards Issue I read on the Russian thread that it was partly to make up for the Centre of Grativty changes that came with the rather Heavy BARS radar that Canards were used, with the Ibris weighing much less there was no need for the Canards on the Su 35.

    TBH, I am not convinced that Irbis is much lighter than Bars. Of course, MKI is a two seater, Su-35 is not. Also Su-35 was “optimized” to use TVC from the start, Su-30MKI, not so much.

    in reply to: Russia's Zhuk-AE radar received full size AESA #2343313
    TR1
    Participant

    We already discussed this in the other thread, but…

    Apparently they want the finished array (1064 element, already flight testing) to have 200km range. Pretty damn good if achieved.
    The 130km figure is wrong anwyays, even the old, smaller array achieved 150km tracking range for a fighter sized target- detection range is naturally higher.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2343511
    TR1
    Participant

    Il-476? Still under construction.

    http://expert.ru/data/public/286635/286663/expert_738_027-1.jpg

    Interesting chart of “Russian Helicopters” portfolio.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2343517
    TR1
    Participant

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to38000/037167.jpg

    Very interesting. Supposedly 4 new Su-27SMs were spotted over Novosibirsk, part of the 12 ordered at MAKS 2009. Potentially more advanced than previous SMs.

    http://vpk-news.ru/articles/7128

    Yet another mention to the potential Su-30MKI order for the RuAF I mentioned earlier.

    in reply to: What ifs.. in modern aviation. #2343547
    TR1
    Participant

    What percentage of all MiG-31s delivered in the 1980s are still flying today?;)

    Not sure how that’s relevant, something called USSR ceased to exist. 😉

    in reply to: Russian Civil Aviation #499807
    TR1
    Participant

    http://arms-tass.su/?page=article&aid=92826&cid=25

    Tu-204SM deliveries to customers expected in 2012.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2343548
    TR1
    Participant

    Commander died. RIP :(. This was no rough landing, a 400 meter drop more like it :(.

    http://arms-tass.su/?page=article&aid=92827&cid=25

    “Serial production of the An-124 can be expected in 2016-2018. Project pays itself off after 50-60 aircraft. Modernized An-124 will lift 150 tons.

    in reply to: What ifs.. in modern aviation. #2344195
    TR1
    Participant

    You might want to tell somebody that in the IIRAF that, they’re still flying them, 35 years after deliveries began, and 32 years since technical support from America dried up.

    Yeah but how many and how much? for all we know the past 2 decades have seen the F-14 fleet perform very few flight hours, and most of the fleet cannibalized to support the few fliers.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XVI #2344207
    TR1
    Participant

    According to the “numbers”, the Irbis should be more “powerful” than the APG-77. 😎

    It certainly seems to beat it in terms of detection range. Shouldn’t be that much of a surprise too, given newer technology, much larger size and space available for the radar and associated systems. Oh, and the glorious fact of both mechanical and electronic scanning angles.

    Now we just need new missiles to keep up with this monstrous radar performance.

    Interesting to see what the new AESA NIIP array can do, especially on a bird the size of the Flanker. Irbis tracks 30 and engages 8 simultaneously, expect that to be increased significantly, and I guess the traditionally stated advances from AESA, high reliability, simultaneous A2A and A2G performance? Irbis can already engage aerial targets while performing ground mapping…

    in reply to: Indian Air Force- News & D iscussion #15 #2344355
    TR1
    Participant

    That was the claimed unit cost in the latest batch ordered. Of course, we don’t know any details or what was included in the sale, so looking it at “per-unit” is perhaps inaccurate.

Viewing 15 posts - 8,671 through 8,685 (of 9,195 total)