Careful now, some people don’t like questions that lead to possibly uncomfortable answers…

Others don’t like repeatedly pointing out the obvious.

Soobrazitelny will be handed over to the Navy in July.

EDIT:

and the Boiky will be launched on April 14th.

I will say it anyway, PAK-FA eat J-20 in WVR, which is the only range if one believe in the hype of ‘stealth’,

I wanted to be diplomatic :p but yeah.

Which variant of the Su 35 is not relevant, any variant of Su 35 is better than majority of ChiCom flankers hence the simulation is relevant.

They are not relevant when they produce absurd results that have no bearing on reality. For example, see the Eurofighter claims done some time back about one Eurofighter being the equivalent of something like 5-10 Su-35s. Putting faith into simulations done by the manufacturer and marketer, is naive to put lightly.

@Teer
What gives you the idea that heavier=more capable in A2A ?
Compare P-51 with P-47 and tell me how the heavier P-47 was more capable,

Heavier armament. More resistant to battle damage. Much faster speed in a dive.

“Boeing presentation” being the key word here. Really, there is nothing to discuss here. If the IAF wants a heavy lift helo, the Mi-26 blows the Chinook out of the water. If they want something else, the Mi-26 is far from ideal.

I don’t want to paste the pic of the Mi-26 carrying the Chinook, but you get the point.

Nice to know that that blog has taken on the role of being an advertisement for major companies though.

Hmm, good eye. That is consistent with the numbers quoted for the smaller zhuk-AE array. But the array shown clearly is different from the one on the MiG-35/M2. Anyone want to count modules 😉

Details on the MiG-29UPG:

http://igorrgroup.blogspot.com/

Looks very comprehensive. Can’t wait to see the cockpit.