dark light

TR1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 8,791 through 8,805 (of 9,195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Military Aviation News From Around The World – VII #2353507
    TR1
    Participant

    Well, it is safe to say Keypublishing shouldn’t worry about the “competition” lol.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2353577
    TR1
    Participant

    Thanks so much Hotdog!

    You cannot make this stuff up. Amazing, lmao. Well, I for one am never buying such an unprofessional magazine again.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2353595
    TR1
    Participant

    Any way you could zoom in and take a screenshot? That sounds hilarious.

    You are right btw, that high gloss format would be painfull on my ****.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2353619
    TR1
    Participant

    what’s interesting is the page after the Su-35S article.
    pg 38 says, Russian pilots flew drunk into Georgia!! 😮
    pilots deliberately dropping bombs in empty areas to avoid risk of flying areas where they may get shot
    lack of operational common sense
    predicatable flight patterns that allowed the Georgians to place their AD in the right areas w/o illuminating themselves.

    holy toledo.

    I can’t zoom in, really?

    Well, I know the best use of CA monthly. To wipe my ass.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2353657
    TR1
    Participant

    Yet on the MMRCA thread you claimed, and I quote; ‘The Super Hornet is a far better Striker than the PAK-FA’. So yeah, you made a claim at this early stage. Although it being a “Super Hornet vs PAK-FA” claim.

    Despite posting very little or at all on here, I’m finding it a rather interesting thread, just a shame about some posts. D’oh!!!

    Don’t forget, the Super Hornet is also the frontrunner!!!11 Trust me, please!

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 6 #2353664
    TR1
    Participant

    Are you comparing the cost of a MKI with a Super Hornet, you do realise that the price of Su-30MKI has gone up in recent years – it was reported in the Indian media that the latest batch of MKIs was just under a 100 million USD a piece – how much is an SH?
    Also overall life cycle costs of the F/A-18E could in fact be a lot lower than that of the Su-30MKI, who knows?:confused:

    The price of the new Su-30MKIs is pretty obviously tied in to what they are buying alongside them/future modernization. Trusting Indian media is like shooting yourself in the foot.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2353669
    TR1
    Participant

    The Algerian two seaters are just UBs, with refueling probe. Not the “advanced” UBT, whatever you want to call it.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2354050
    TR1
    Participant

    So how many versions of the basic Su-27 are in service – Su-27, Su-27SM Su-30, Su-30MK2, perhaps include Su-34. How many different avionic fits are there on the Su-24, Su-25, MiG-29?
    The man responsible for keeping the RuAF in tip-top condition must lead a charmed life I’m sure…:confused:

    Su-30 isn’t really in service, just a few in Lipetsk.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2354562
    TR1
    Participant

    According to who were those China destined aiframes?

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2354722
    TR1
    Participant

    With the mysterious Su-27SM avionics load out?

    With the well known Su-30MK2 avionics load out, N-001VEP domestic version likely, however that may end up being N-00V, in other words, a Su-27SM equivalent.

    EDIT: Trident got it ahead of me.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2354773
    TR1
    Participant

    @J-20,
    as the name suggests Su-30M2, missing out the K for commercial or export indicates that this is the domestic variant of the Su-30MK2. It has in fact been stated that these airframes were originally destined for an export customer, supposedly China. I don’t know whether the latter is true or not, but these aircraft are definitely based on the MK2, with possibly minor adjustments to the RuAFs requirements.

    These are brand new, built for RuAF airframes. Knappo got the Su-35 order, MOD decided they wanted new two seat trainers alongside them. Knappo makes Su-30 (MK, MK2 flavor), viola.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2354777
    TR1
    Participant

    interesting. Square fins. I am guessing these are the same as the ones China and Hugo Chavez has?

    The location of construction should be a good hint 😉

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2354852
    TR1
    Participant

    http://www.knaapo.ru/rus/gallery/events/combat/su-30m2/index.wbp

    Su-30 for Russian air force! This is a moment of great importance for KNAPPO and the RuAF.

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 6 #2355109
    TR1
    Participant

    100+ pages not enough for you 🙂
    or you not happy with what it said about the MiG-35

    Just look at the source man.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2355860
    TR1
    Participant

    Me personally, when talking about 5 radars, I’m talking about 5 emitter/receiver locations (and no, I’m not counting individual T/R modules!).

    me too, that is what NIIP interviews seem to suggest. The wings being for IFF only is pure speculative nonsense.

Viewing 15 posts - 8,791 through 8,805 (of 9,195 total)