dark light

TR1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 8,806 through 8,820 (of 9,195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2356469
    TR1
    Participant

    T-50s sensor diversity (X-band, L-band, IRST) will certainly give it advantage in modern stealth combat, as well as a very good situational awareness.

    Very true. But, the typical suspects will act predictably.
    http://i.imgur.com/RHuHq.gif

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2356605
    TR1
    Participant

    We’ve been through this three times now in this thread alone, there are no five radars!

    No, you just keep banging your head against the wall because the concept of 5 radars on the PAK-FA really makes you feel threatened for reasons I don’t quite get.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2357061
    TR1
    Participant

    Russia and SA have been jousting for number 1 oil exporter for quite a few years, its not really anything new. The Venezuela reserves are just claimed btw, for all we know it could be BS.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2357120
    TR1
    Participant

    You don’t think an aircraft that will be produced in 3 very different variants, one being VTOL, with an EO DAS, HMD and onboard EW suite developed from the AN/ALR-94 is more complex than the PAK-FA? Tell me you’re kidding? You must be.
    Anyway i’m off to bed now, I have a 8 mile run in the morning.

    of course. Don’t have nightmares about the 5 radar PAK-FA compliment please.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2357128
    TR1
    Participant

    Also i’m not sure why you’re so keen to compare it to the F-35, afterall the F-35 is a much more complex program with more complex systems and more challenging requirements.

    Of course it is.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2357146
    TR1
    Participant

    Its all very well coming up with the no funding excuse but funding doesn’t appear to be the issue with the PAK-FA, as was noted earlier there are problems that are causing delays hence it’s going to be produced very very slowly with only 10 in the next 4 – 6 years.

    lol right, you know this from your precise insider issue. You get a grade A for baseless speculation. Problems causing delays? My god, that’s unheard of in a military program. I really hope the PAK-FA can get back on track like the spotless F-35 team. Or the mere 13 years it took for the first production raptors to be delivered.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2357152
    TR1
    Participant

    As I said, comparing the priority PAK-FA program, to the criticaly underfunded for 15 years Su-34 one, is trolling or ignorance. Hey, how long did it take for Raptor to be delivered after first flight again? F-35? Wow, slow programs indeed.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2357159
    TR1
    Participant

    yep two different things. its often said the difference will be like Su-30 to MKI
    but I personally think its more akin to
    AV-8B vs Sea Harrier. similar origins, two very different paths.

    Has any authoritative figure actually made the SU-30 > MKI comparison for the PAK-FA > FGFA? I find it completely inaccurate.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2357162
    TR1
    Participant

    Any idea what the many problems are? There must be a few issues because Putin claimed a 2013 IOC and one issue or a few minor issues wouldn’t set the program back several years.
    I can see there only being about 20 in service by the end of the decade. This is the Su-34 story unfolding all over again by the looks of things.

    How is this anything like the SU-34 story? Are you at all familiar with the intricacies or even vague details of both programs? Comparing PAK-FA program to the Su-34 (which had close to 15 years of barely-any funding) just shows you are here to troll.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2357164
    TR1
    Participant

    It’ll more likely than not slow and complicate the process for both parties.

    I guess you would know from the F-35. 😀

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2357580
    TR1
    Participant

    No doubt Indian involvement, specifically a large order book with airframes that are hopefully very similar to the RuAF ones, will lower prices, speed up delivery and allow larger procurement for both sides.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2357816
    TR1
    Participant

    Just ignore the troll guys, seriously.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force- News & D iscussion #15 #2357852
    TR1
    Participant

    Hmm, if they did it would make re-equipping the MiG-27 with the Al-31 a more attractive option perhaps.

    in reply to: Russian Civil Aviation #506562
    TR1
    Participant

    Not to rag on Ilyushin’s safety record, but they built far less planes than Tupolev did in the same time frame. More planes, more chance something goes wrong.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force- News & D iscussion #15 #2357914
    TR1
    Participant

    India does not produce the Al-31 for the MKI by itself right?

Viewing 15 posts - 8,806 through 8,820 (of 9,195 total)