dark light

TR1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 8,986 through 9,000 (of 9,195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Export orders J-20 vs PAK-FA??? #2335081
    TR1
    Participant

    The existence of a J-20 or whatever that thing is if anything greatly improves PAK-FA export prospects throughout east Asia.

    in reply to: Export orders J-20 vs PAK-FA??? #2335173
    TR1
    Participant

    What do you know about the J-20s performance vs the PAK-FAs?

    Another worthwhile thread by Scooter.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2335252
    TR1
    Participant
    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2335607
    TR1
    Participant

    BTW The US sells to Pakistan because we need them in the war against Terrorist. What does Russia sell to China for….;)

    Oh boy, what predictable naivete and arrogance.

    You are the one who brought India into this, not I.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2335609
    TR1
    Participant

    Clearly, we are not likely to get any official word from either Russia nor China. Yet, the fact is the J-20 is performing Taxi Test’s and is just about ready to fly. So, it has to be powered by something.

    Yes. And chances are that it is not 117S.

    Also, let’s not forget that the 117S is in production for the Su-35. So, supplying a small number to China shouldn’t be a problem.

    Why don’t you enlighten me and tell me how many 117S have been made. SU-35 production hasn’t exactly hit a high number yet, likewise 117S.

    Plus, didn’t Russia just offer China the Su-35. Which, is equipped with 117S’s???
    And if China chose it, they would tool up and increase 117S production. No indication that this has happened yet.

    Sorry, but your logic escapes me……:confused:

    On this point, we are identical 🙂

    Cheers,
    TR1

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2335619
    TR1
    Participant

    Russia has had no problem selling China whatever it wants. As long as it comes up with the cash. Regardless, of protests from India….:(

    I am sure you know this from your intimate knowledge of Russia’s export offerings to China.

    funny you mention India, as I recall your beloved United States is the prime supplier of one of India’s hostile border nations…

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2335623
    TR1
    Participant

    Been quoted by several sources………

    [/U][/B]

    Yeah, unnamed sources have been making all sorts of speculation, does not make it anything more than speculation. 117S has not exactly had huge production numbers yet, in fact quite the opposite. Delivery to China, especially some time ago would be unlikely, and further would likely be noted in Russian aviation community…I do not recall seeing anything.

    It is certainly not out of the realm of possibility.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2335693
    TR1
    Participant

    What about China getting 117S for its J-20???

    That is quite an assumption.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2335761
    TR1
    Participant

    Clearly, despite the talk of exposed fan-blades and Su-27 derivative from some sections, this aircraft has been designed for stealth & the designers are keeping the end objective in mind when it comes to production variants.

    x2.
    That talk is as mind-boggling as it is utter nonsense.

    in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2335799
    TR1
    Participant

    Wow, I get back from 2 weeks of internet exile and J-20 (?) is revealed? awesome.

    in reply to: What Makes Euro-canards better than Russian fighters? #2346069
    TR1
    Participant

    We really have no clue what’s in the Su-27SM. The Bars is all great, but something along the lines of an AWG-9 in power for even a pulse-doppler is “very good.” Reduce the power a bit, increase processing power and you have something comparable.

    For all we know, it could even be a Pero PESA. Fact is, we know nothing. And it really is a little irritating 😉

    Not really. Dig around on Russian forums, I’ll see what I come up with. But I can promise you 100% it dos not have Pero, and with 99% certainty that it is N-001V. Better than any exported N-001 variant, but certainly inferior to Bars.

    That quote by the Russian general is also included in Yefim Gordon’s Book “Modern Russian air power” but frankly Russian generals have been speaking nonsense more often than not.

    in reply to: What Makes Euro-canards better than Russian fighters? #2346080
    TR1
    Participant

    so what aircraft did the Su-27 shoot down so far?

    MiG-29s for one.

    in reply to: What Makes Euro-canards better than Russian fighters? #2346086
    TR1
    Participant

    The Su-27SM is pretty much equal to any export Su-30 variant.
    They have small difference in Radar, engines output thrust, fuel capasity, drag penalty etc etc..

    Radar difference does not that seem that small to me. In other areas Su-27Sm may indeed have advantage over export flankers.

    in reply to: Future of the Admiral Kuzetsov and Naval PAK-FA? #2017241
    TR1
    Participant

    As it stands the Kuzetsov will require a very extensive Refit.(2012-2017) Plus, the Su-33 is very out dated and the Mig-29K’s will become obsolete shortly after the turn of the next decade.

    In short the Kuzetsov in Russian Service. Is of little practical use and is very expensive. Great to show the flag but little else.

    Nonsense on all counts.

    Su-33 is not very outdated, anyways it is being updates. MiG-29K is not going to become obsolete by 2020. Kuznetsov can operate without a very expensive refit. It is still critical for maintaining naval aviation, not to mention a useful naval unit when MiG-29K multirole aircraft arrive.

    Seriously, must you comment on things you have no clue about?

    in reply to: What Makes Euro-canards better than Russian fighters? #2346502
    TR1
    Participant

    Fanboyism, that’s what.

Viewing 15 posts - 8,986 through 9,000 (of 9,195 total)