dark light

Consul

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,531 through 1,545 (of 1,615 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 1980s Southend #1397344
    Consul
    Participant

    I recall DXS was to have gone to Shoreham according to some reports to hang in the terminal – but I believe it actually went to Cambridgeshire for static restoration and an alternative machine was earmarked for Shoreham. After DXS left Southend it certainly appeared again in the PFA tent at the PFA rally as part of their / the homebuild movement’s anniversary celebrations a few years back.

    in reply to: Nicosia 1957 to 1959 Reminiscences #1397509
    Consul
    Participant

    [QUOTE=italian harvard]Yes, I can confirm 😉
    btw even the one in Vigna di Valle comes from Lebanon, but was repainted with wartime colors (even if wrong) and is being refurbished with all the original equipment. I wonder what happened to the third S.79, might well still be sittin there? :

    The 3rd SM79 is in Italy – believed stored at Universtity of Pisa according to the superb Preserved Axis aircraft website – here’s a link to a picture of it. http://www.preservedaxisaircraft.com/Italy/images/SM79_MM21150.jpg

    in reply to: Shuttleworth Discovery #1397531
    Consul
    Participant

    Roger,
    Thanks for the extra background on the material in my picture. I’ll try and find the rest of the batch I took in there and hopefully you can identify some more of the flying surfaces and components that sat amongst the more recognisable aircraft fuselages- very interesting. So far as the Pixie goes – I agree with David Burke to the extent that it is an artifact and should be conserved. I believe, however, that it might gain more attention and understanding by the observer if it were able to be incorporated into a static rebuild, which hopefully didn’t compromise (by any loss or excessive replacement) the originality of the components that survive. I totally accord with his views that it should not be restored to fly on two grounds: a) to restore it to fly would require almost complete replacement of any original components to ensure structural integrity and strength b) in effect this would then be a replica and if a replica is feasible then the existing components could be used as patterns without their destruction or abandonment as ongoing exhibits. There are, of course, examples of good quality replicas / reproductions such as the Hawker Cygnet, which flies – whereas the original safely survives as a static. In Holland they have statically restored the BAT Bantam (ex Shuttleworth) and I believe were going to (or are) using the data from the restoration to enable a flyable replica to be constructed. Maybe this would be the best way to go – but it’s all pure conjecture as the MAM must call the shots as the owners.

    in reply to: Shuttleworth Discovery #1398323
    Consul
    Participant

    I took the photograph (mentioned in a post above) of the Pixie 111 G-EBJG that was published in Wrecks & Relics 16th edition. I took that shot in Nov 1997. The picture (the original slide of which I can’t lay my hands on just now) depicted the fuselage and tailplane and you could see the various cowlings placed on the ground in front of it. The aircraft was then (and still is) in their Robbin hangar. Although now it is relegated out of view behind the more glamourous but far less rare Sea Harrier.

    I attach for your enjoyment here a scan of another slide of G-EBJG which I took earlier, back in 1988. It was then stored in a brick building which had no windows and was adjacent to the Museum’s old location on the site. A while later I recall that the Pixie’s rudder appeared on display for a while upstairs in their new hangar – but it’s no longer there and I wonder if it can be located now.

    The store in which I took the attached photo contained a number of interesting machines, including the Messenger (now moved on). It also held components of the Wheeler Slymph G-ABOI (built (I think in Iraq) by Alan Wheeler, the one time doyen of the Shuttleworth collection. It never flew). I say components – well what I was shown comprised no more than remnants such as wheels plus (literally) a tea chest of small components / bits of wood. I recall seeing a photo in Control Column of ‘BOI taken in woods at Old Warden. It was then sitting on its wheels and comprised a complete but fabric-less fuselage minus engine. I fear the Slymph is beyond resurrection – but the Pixie deserves better. It is a fascinating example of one of the Lympne trials aircraft and interesting in having flown in both monoplane and biplane configuration. The MAPS subsequent MAM must be congratulated on keeping the remains under cover all these years. As, however, it doesn’t seem to fit with MAM’s primary themes and it needs very specialist woodworking and associated skills to properly restore, maybe it could be released or swapped to enable someone with relevant will and resources to bring it back to at least static glory?

    The picture attached shows the inverted fuselage with tailplane and elevators stacked against it. The picture was taken using flash as it was pitch black in there! Enjoy.

    in reply to: Airships in the UK in the 1980's #1401500
    Consul
    Participant

    Dave,
    At last I’ve found some of the slides that I took of the Airship Industries machines G-SKSC & G-BIHN when they were at Cardington in October 1986. At that time one was operating sight-seeing flights, but I believe corporate clients took up most of the opportunities. As a comparison I’ve also included a shot of Goodyear blimp N2A (the same company did not construct that of course). I was fortunate to be allowed on the roof of a Birmingham skyscraper in 1972 to take the Goodyear shot – health and safety would probably prevent such an opportunity these days!

    in reply to: Another WW1 arrival #1402594
    Consul
    Participant

    GASML asked months ago if anyone had reference photos of the Tiger / Be2C “replica” which Charles Boddington et al had created at Sywell in 1968 and has this year been recovered to the UK after years in the US. At long last I’ve found the slide I took of the machine on 8 March 1968. Hope this angle is of some help if the restoration is still ongoing?

    in reply to: Exeter circa 1959? #1407304
    Consul
    Participant

    The latest edition of the quarterly journal Aeromilitaria published by Air-Britain includes an illustrated run down including serials and codes of all RAF Balliols. I unfortunately dont subscribe to that specific periodical (though I’m an A-B member) but I have seen the article. I would commend that as a potential source of further detail.

    in reply to: RCAFM Museum – Halifax NA337 Unveiled!(Update) #1418693
    Consul
    Participant

    The Anson did come from Wetaskiwin but they had / have more than those quoted in post in this thread. I photographed 6 stored externally during a visit there this year. (That’s apart from the (approx) 25 I photographed at another place in Alberta this year).

    in reply to: Fw 58 anyone? #1420063
    Consul
    Participant

    There is a complete and restored Fw58 (actually a Fw58B Weihe) in the collection of Museu Aerospacial in Brazil and you can link through to a photo of it via: http://www.musal.aer.mil.br/links_aeron.htm

    in reply to: RCAFM Museum – Halifax NA337 Unveiled!(Update) #1420073
    Consul
    Participant

    Thanks very much for taking and sharing these shots. What a beauty – I saw her during restoration about 5 years back and was so impressed by the professionalism, enthusiasm and dedication of the restoration team – their efforts and those of the recovery team have really paid off.

    in reply to: Pics to make you weep #1421516
    Consul
    Participant

    [QUOTE=GlynRamsden]If you want a good cry look at these pictures. All but the Lincoln were at Seletar 67-69.

    Glyn

    1 Lincoln B2 WD132 at Hullavington

    Glynn
    I must have missed this when you first posted it. Very interesting to see WD132 – her remains eventually ended up in the B.K.L. Alloys yard in Kings Norton Birmingham by June 1968. I used to frequent that yard which later saw the arrival of vast amounts of Valiant remains.

    in reply to: Airships in the UK in the 1980's #1421519
    Consul
    Participant

    Dave,

    If you view the attached and look at former maufacturers (at the bottom of the list) I think the entry for Airship Industries will supply the answer. Their airships were often to be seen at Cardington – I do have some slides of a couple of them together there I can’t recall the date. So far as I know they did not make any of the Goodyear blimps. One of their craft was displayed at Farnborough on at least one occasion. I thought the company failed not long after one of their test pilots died in a non-airship related accident but my memory may be playing tricks.
    http://spot.colorado.edu/~dziadeck/airship/manufacturers.htm

    in reply to: Havocs in the UK #1426196
    Consul
    Participant

    OK, OK, it wasn’t very clever, but I took the view that if he chooses not to be known as Richard then he can’t get upset about it. I would be VERY surprised to hear if it does any damage to anyone’s chances of seeing the collection, or I wouldn’t have made the remark.

    I apologise if anyone has taken offence at my remark.

    Now can we get back to Havocs and Bostons?

    Adrian

    Thanks for that Adrian……possibly I had a sense-of-humour-ectomy, but in my reaction I was just trying to preserve the guy’s dignity. Over the years I’ve had to cope myself with ribbing over my surname, so I tried to look at it from his point of view. I agree let’s stick to aviation!

    in reply to: Havocs in the UK #1427096
    Consul
    Participant

    I visited Dick’s restoration project and photographed the material about 5 years ago. I took slides (which are in deep store at present). He is a very knowledgable and highly committed preservationist who has done a considerable amount to secure and restore the compoenents he has. Amongst the material are indeed the items referred to by Setter donated by the Australians. Dick used to have annual open days and took a lot of trouble to allow interested parties to see the material. As it is all stored in a “domestic” environment, the components are not easy to photograph as they are in various locations on site and somewhat cramped in.

    Let’s show a little respect for this guy and his efforts. I don’t think that one contributor to this thread taking the michael out of his name is very clever – it certainly won’t help anyone now wishing to gain access and cooperation to see the collection. I also doubt that Dick needs suggestions about what to do with the material he has amassed and is working upon, when he has struggled to achieve what the major UK museums have failed so far to do re this type.

    in reply to: Austers in military service book(s) #1428559
    Consul
    Participant

    I believe the book you’re enquiring about is “Auster – A brief History of the Auster Aircraft in British Military Service”. Author / Editor is Barry Ketley. Publisher is Flight Recorder Publications. ISBN is 0 954605 6 6. It was published 2005 and RRP is UK £12.99. I obtained my copy a couple of months back when at Breighton. The UK & Europe distributor, however, is Midland Publishing (Tel 01455 233747). The content includes: Foundations, the AOP, Wartime Auster types, Into combat, Austers in the East, Postwar Military Auster types, Peacetime service, Camo and markings, Postwar prototypes, Mk V walkaround, Luftwaffe Auster victory claims, Scale Plans Auster Mk111, Military Auster Models – Production and serials (listings not individual data), British military Auster units. The book is softback and has 96 pages. Well illustrated – mostly with b&w contemporary shots but some modern colour too. Hope this helps.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,531 through 1,545 (of 1,615 total)