91Regal
No problem – just pleased it stirred some interest.
In another thread on this site I previously put up a photo of the Freighter concerned in Canada. I photographed it at Wetaskiwin last Summer prior to speculation about it’s disposal arising. See: http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=106000
91Regal
If you did what I suggested in my original post and looked at the website to which I provided the link you will find that from the homepage if you click on “Catalogue and Bibliography” then look at their output for 1993 their book about B&P is described. I did suggest following the links – it takes a bit of effort but it’s worthwhile – it’s all there!
Only if she joins in as a competitor. 😀
Plazz
Have you tried the people who run the following site?http://egbj.fotopic.net/
The response I received from the local management at Cosford was along similar lines as that received by others from other areas of RAFM management, i.e.
………”Thank you for your email about the BA Museum Collection. The five aircraft displayed here are the property of British Airways and therefore the responsibility of the Airline. Until 2001 BA maintained these airframes and generally assisted the Museum in other ways too. Since this support was switched off, the aircraft have been neglected by British Airways and the RAF Museum is powerless to intervene. Our funding is from the Ministry of Defence and cannot be expended on these aeroplanes. The press release says that the situation is under review and it remains so today. The contact at British Airways is:
Mr Bryan Mitchell,
British Airways
Waterside (HFA3)
PO Box 365,
Harmondsworth,
Middlesex,
UB7 0GB
John Francis”
Hi Franc
“Bellanca’s Golden Age” recently published by Alan and Drina Abel has the following about the Bellanca 77-140 Bomber:
” In 1934-35 Bellanca also built the Bellanca 77-140 Bomber. While the US Army rejected the bomber, several were exported and saw service in Columbia, South America. Intended primarily as a patrol bomber, it carried a crew of four – pilot, navigator / bombardier and two gunners. The bomber was built as a landplane and a seaplane. Two 715-hp Wright Cyclone engines which provided a maximum speed of 165mph, powered the bomber. The initial rate of climb was 950 fpm and the range at maximum overload was 1,500 miles.”
The book has a picture of a floatplane version of the bomber. It is high winged with the aerofoil section 3/4 span strut arrangement of the Aircruiser origins are very evident. It has an open-topped nose turret. It has a single fin but with finlets, presumably to give increased directional control in view of the floats fitted.
Sorry I can’t scan in the picture , the book is of the perfect bound type. If you want to get a copy it is ISBN1-891118-46-3 and is published by Wind Canyon Books Inc. They have a website: http://www.windcanyonbooks.com.
Hope this helps.
Fiat lux – Let there be light
Fiat TFC – Let there be darkness!
Fiat CR-42 – Let there be anticipation
Setter,
“The test of a civilized person is first self-awareness, and then depth after depth of sincerity in self-confrontation.” (Quote from Clarence Day)
In reviewing and apologising surely you have done enough – to leave would not turn the clock back and would deprive this forum of a quality contributor who has never in the time I’ve viewed your posts displayed any mal-intent. Please reconsider.
Quite right TLAR – twas a spolling erar
Ben,
Is this “Redwing” as in the Redwing (biplane) aircraft of the type restored back in the eighties by Jim Pearce, which was then based at Redhill at one stage?
Paul F
I didn’t realise Jim Pearce had a hand in this – G-ABNX was owned by John Pothecary for many , many years and he based it at one time at Shoreham where he ran his aircraft business. I think he’s now based in the Old Sarum area. When at Shoreham John restored many aircraft including Spanish DH60s. Are you saying Jim Pearce rather than John worked on ‘BNX?
I recall UK displays in the 1960s when flying examples of WWII aircraft could be counted on one hand and were mostly operated by manufacturers or what have since become historic flights. The notion of a person restoring and maintaining a massive private collection were but a dream. I know there are a number of folk who have contributed to the generation and growth of the UK warbird scene but IMHO Stephen Grey has had the greatest positive effect. Being a renowned international business expert he could no doubt have opted to locate his collection in any country he chose. We are VERY fortunate he chose the UK and has shared his passion by creating a situation where we can not only enjoy see the TFC collection fly but can get close to much of the restoration work. I’ve travelled to many museums, restoration shops and private collections round the World but consider TFC unparalled. In my professional life one of my responsibilities concerns information security and commercial sensitivity of information around any potential deal is very high and is a delicate area. Whilst interest in aircraft collections is understandable and often helps their support, it would be a great shame if unwelcome speculation jeopardised the health or growth or continuance of any such organisation(s) and there is a balance to be drawn. I’m grateful for grayfly’s taking the trouble and concern to post this re TFC and I agree with HP57’s comment posted at 17.47.
T6Flyer
Sorry I pipped you to the post – but it’s comforting to know there’s someone else out there as sad as I am i.e. able to recall such esoteric details!
I think it’s the Fairey Battle which Strathallen obtained, passed to Charles Church and is now in Brussels. I recall that at one time it was owned by a US gent who endorsed it with stars and bars?
Surely the proposal must relate to WL349 as WL345 remains on a pole near St Leonards – see prior thread?
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?p=705046