While its obviously the same aircraft depicted, the aircraft I have posted is not French.
And today we have…..this contraption:
(And its not the flying egg from Mork and Mindy)

I was just reading through a list of WWII RAF aircraft and seem to have encountered some of the inconsistencies. bear in mind, that this is simply a list and I have not researched it further.
Beechcraft Model 18 Expeditor
Martin B-26 Marauder
Martin PBM Mariner
North American B-25 Mitchell
Douglas C-54 Skymaster
Flying boat named after an animal?
Grumman G-21 Goose
Fighters named after animals?
Bell P-39 Airacobra
Brewster F2A Buffalo
Curtiss P-40 Warhawk Tomahawk / Kittyhawk
North American Aviation P-51 Mustang
Perhaps you could try to make a virtual museum online, so you can guage the interest (even if its not 100% comparable).
I would also think, that a museum like that, is best placed where large numbers of people holiday. People on holidays always need something to do and on a rainy day, they would visit any museum.
Its normally only the die-hard fans, that would travel to a specialised museum, unless there is something nearby to attract them – so they visit while they are in the area anyway.
But they did use U.S. names if already applied, no?
Mitchell? Havoc? Fortress? Liberator? Goose? Corsair?
Wasn’t the C-47 already named Skytrain by the time the UK got their first examples (under Lend Lease)?But if that’s correct, why did they change the name from Superfortress to Washington?
Also the Harvard, Martlet and Gosling had different names than their US counterparts.And Hudson isn’t a city or state, rather a Bay in Canada or a river (and part time A320 landing area) in New York.
Is it possible that rather like the U.S. military the designation system is standardized..just not all the time.:D
That sounds about right. If there was a standard somebody here would know it by heart and post if.
Just try asking about the US system 😎
A quick Google reveals that that the Gerner G.I isn’t completely forgotten.
Here a model of the Gerner G-1 Adler build Christian Hoffmann.
Gerner G I.
I would hardly say, that I guessed it :p
The engine was the needed clue. Going to read about it now….

Told you he was going to regret that stab…..
Almost certainly aircraft. The cable shoe for the static wire is clearly seen on the top picture.
On the picture it looks like the lip of the cover is on the outside (it thus has to be positioned from the inside), which is something you might see around fuel tanks. Perhaps the filler cap was located behind this cover.
Normally you would have screws along the edge, if it was going anywhere near water, to make sure it was sealed. The 4 way lock will be a clue to identifying it.
its one of those aircraft, where I’m sure I have seen it before…..but where?
However, I’m pretty sure the designer regretted the size of the vertical stabilizer, once he was airborn.
Mr ShortC, you are absolutly right!
Here is a bit i copy/pasted from a flyer:

The quality looks very nice. The wing is original, but I din’t understand if its being restored, or its going on the replica.
Or ask the Irish air corps, I seem to remember they lost a door last year….but I think it was a helicopter.
Its been awhile since I was inside a C-47, but I don’t think the door is identical. Primarily I seem to remember the cockpit door being rectangular.
Secondarily the cockpit door in a C-47 opens forward and the the right, which would leave the lock on the door above on the cabin side of the door.
Nope, its not a Comte…