dark light

Mondariz

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 781 through 795 (of 1,411 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Air Cafe! #1221957
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Hi mondariz, you are right, it used to be called the “the Air Pub” back in 1984 when i was working at kastrup airport. It used to get full of pilots & cabin crew !!

    Steve

    IIRC “The Air Pub” and the one I’m talking about, are not the same. “The Air Pub” was an actual pub, where as “Flyvergrillen” is more of a grill-bar, serving sausages, hotdogs and burgers.

    Did you recognise it from the pictures in the links?

    in reply to: The Air Cafe! #1222577
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Copenhagen Airport (Kastrup) has a “Chipper” type establishment (but they server beer), just outside the fence and with a great view of the operations.

    Very popular with spotters and casual spectators alike.

    http://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flyvergrillen

    http://www.highways.dk/danmark/kobenhavn/flyvergrillen.php

    in reply to: P-51D 'Old Crow' #1224362
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Very nice work.

    in reply to: Mystery Beaufort Photo #1224938
    Mondariz
    Participant

    I have no idea about the picture, but its great to get a few of your pictures here, now that WIX is down 😀

    in reply to: Filming mock ups, where are they? #1225031
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Nice to see she still work in the movies.

    Although she never gets invited around to fancy premiers :p

    in reply to: Anyone got £100m for two paintings? #1226117
    Mondariz
    Participant

    I fully agree with Megalith’s (Steve) notion about aviation (in particular historic aviation) being a fringe interest, that’s unlikely to ever attract fundings equal to art.

    BUT, as I understand it (being Johnny foreigner here) quite a lot of public spending is already going towards historic aviation in Britain.

    The BBMF is operated on government monies (and has been for years).

    The RAF museums would see a substantial public funding each year. Its unlikely that the RAF museums (there are two, right?) can run entirely on ticket sales.

    Please correct me if im wrong.

    Im pretty sure there are plenty of other places/organisations related to Historic aviation, that receive funding each year. Maybe we should make a list, so it can be made clear, what is spend on historic aviation (or at least where monies are spend).

    I seem to remember there are a few air fields, that have been made historic landmarks. Thats not free and it furthermore prevents the area to be used for development (thus not making the money it could have made).

    How about Duxford, is that running 100% on private funding?

    Im pretty sure, that there are art museums/organisations/interest groups, who feel this investment could be used better on other things. You just can’t please everyone in cases like this.

    Maybe you should be pleased, that you live in a country, that takes its history and cultural heritage seriously enough, to cough up a cool 100M to support parts of it. Even if its a part of culture, that you don’t really enjoy too much.

    As mentioned above, I would like to see where public funding supports historic aviation in Britain. I think people would be surprised.

    in reply to: We Did it! #1226725
    Mondariz
    Participant

    What a GREAT post!

    Keep it running. Great job!

    in reply to: MEGA TYPHOON/TEMPEST PHOTO ALBUM ON EBAY #1227265
    Mondariz
    Participant

    A fine collection of pictures, but a bit steeply priced, or what?

    in reply to: Filming mock ups, where are they? #1227270
    Mondariz
    Participant

    The BoB models (or some of them), can be located in “Wrecks & Relics”. IIRC they are marked FSM for “full scale model”.

    If you don’t have the book, I will try to locate some for you.

    in reply to: BMW VI Aero-Engine in New Zealand? #1227986
    Mondariz
    Participant

    I might be wrong but i heard a while ago a Heinkel he51 was being built to fly in Germany.Anyone else heard this?

    It seems they are:

    http://www.he-51.de/index.html

    and here about the design work:

    http://www.alibre.com/success/customerstories/cs-200805-heinkel.asp

    What a great job!

    in reply to: FW190 vs. Spitfires in IL2 #221656
    Mondariz
    Participant

    It is always wise to not comment on what you are not sure about isn’t it?

    True, but you posted in Historic Aviation (before it was moved), so I took it you had some historic point and simply wanted to say, that you can’t make a historic point by using a combat flying game.

    in reply to: BMW VI Aero-Engine in New Zealand? #1229380
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Been looking browsing a bit for aircraft owned by Jackson and came up with this (for now):

    Bristol F.2 Fighter

    From wikipedia:
    “New Zealand film director Peter Jackson owns D-8040”

    Sopwith Camel
    From: http://www.kiwiaircraftimages.com/sho01oma.html
    “Director (and Camel owner) Peter Jackson was on the commentary stand”

    I think both are airworthy and Jackson might also own a number of static display aircraft.

    in reply to: BMW VI Aero-Engine in New Zealand? #1229386
    Mondariz
    Participant

    1930s Luftwaffe biplanes which I believe aren’t exactly up Jackson’s alley. I thought he was more into WWI aviation.

    Peter

    Jackson is very much into WWI aviation, perhaps even more than WWII.

    He is deeply involved in this museum:

    http://www.omaka.org.nz/

    in reply to: Something for your museum texantomcat? #1229389
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Unfortunatly its only “Collection in Person”…

    Didn’t they used to deliver those by air mail?

    in reply to: FW190 vs. Spitfires in IL2 #221662
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Great that you have fun with the IL2 game, plenty of people have gotten involved with historic avitaion from that corner.

    I’m not really sure what you are saying in your post, but I hope you realise, that under no circumstances can you compare a combat flight simulation like IL2, to the expirence of actually flying WWII aerial combat.

    The physics engine is simply not good enough (I have played both IL2 and Pacific Fighter, which both uses Maddox game engine). Although Im not a pilot myself, I have talked to plenty of pilots (military and civilian), who all concur on the lack of realistic flight characteristics.

Viewing 15 posts - 781 through 795 (of 1,411 total)