Hi mondariz, you are right, it used to be called the “the Air Pub” back in 1984 when i was working at kastrup airport. It used to get full of pilots & cabin crew !!
Steve
IIRC “The Air Pub” and the one I’m talking about, are not the same. “The Air Pub” was an actual pub, where as “Flyvergrillen” is more of a grill-bar, serving sausages, hotdogs and burgers.
Did you recognise it from the pictures in the links?
Copenhagen Airport (Kastrup) has a “Chipper” type establishment (but they server beer), just outside the fence and with a great view of the operations.
Very popular with spotters and casual spectators alike.
Very nice work.
I have no idea about the picture, but its great to get a few of your pictures here, now that WIX is down 😀
Nice to see she still work in the movies.
Although she never gets invited around to fancy premiers :p
I fully agree with Megalith’s (Steve) notion about aviation (in particular historic aviation) being a fringe interest, that’s unlikely to ever attract fundings equal to art.
BUT, as I understand it (being Johnny foreigner here) quite a lot of public spending is already going towards historic aviation in Britain.
The BBMF is operated on government monies (and has been for years).
The RAF museums would see a substantial public funding each year. Its unlikely that the RAF museums (there are two, right?) can run entirely on ticket sales.
Please correct me if im wrong.
Im pretty sure there are plenty of other places/organisations related to Historic aviation, that receive funding each year. Maybe we should make a list, so it can be made clear, what is spend on historic aviation (or at least where monies are spend).
I seem to remember there are a few air fields, that have been made historic landmarks. Thats not free and it furthermore prevents the area to be used for development (thus not making the money it could have made).
How about Duxford, is that running 100% on private funding?
Im pretty sure, that there are art museums/organisations/interest groups, who feel this investment could be used better on other things. You just can’t please everyone in cases like this.
Maybe you should be pleased, that you live in a country, that takes its history and cultural heritage seriously enough, to cough up a cool 100M to support parts of it. Even if its a part of culture, that you don’t really enjoy too much.
As mentioned above, I would like to see where public funding supports historic aviation in Britain. I think people would be surprised.
What a GREAT post!
Keep it running. Great job!
A fine collection of pictures, but a bit steeply priced, or what?
The BoB models (or some of them), can be located in “Wrecks & Relics”. IIRC they are marked FSM for “full scale model”.
If you don’t have the book, I will try to locate some for you.
I might be wrong but i heard a while ago a Heinkel he51 was being built to fly in Germany.Anyone else heard this?
It seems they are:
http://www.he-51.de/index.html
and here about the design work:
http://www.alibre.com/success/customerstories/cs-200805-heinkel.asp
What a great job!
It is always wise to not comment on what you are not sure about isn’t it?
True, but you posted in Historic Aviation (before it was moved), so I took it you had some historic point and simply wanted to say, that you can’t make a historic point by using a combat flying game.
Been looking browsing a bit for aircraft owned by Jackson and came up with this (for now):
Bristol F.2 Fighter
From wikipedia:
“New Zealand film director Peter Jackson owns D-8040”
Sopwith Camel
From: http://www.kiwiaircraftimages.com/sho01oma.html
“Director (and Camel owner) Peter Jackson was on the commentary stand”
I think both are airworthy and Jackson might also own a number of static display aircraft.
1930s Luftwaffe biplanes which I believe aren’t exactly up Jackson’s alley. I thought he was more into WWI aviation.
Peter
Jackson is very much into WWI aviation, perhaps even more than WWII.
He is deeply involved in this museum:
Unfortunatly its only “Collection in Person”…
Didn’t they used to deliver those by air mail?
Great that you have fun with the IL2 game, plenty of people have gotten involved with historic avitaion from that corner.
I’m not really sure what you are saying in your post, but I hope you realise, that under no circumstances can you compare a combat flight simulation like IL2, to the expirence of actually flying WWII aerial combat.
The physics engine is simply not good enough (I have played both IL2 and Pacific Fighter, which both uses Maddox game engine). Although Im not a pilot myself, I have talked to plenty of pilots (military and civilian), who all concur on the lack of realistic flight characteristics.