Does these pics show the ridge what Oxcart is describing?
Yes, its the “black line” that runs along the canopy.
Trying to locate some info about the “ridge”, I came across these sites:
http://www.condor49ers.org.uk/vixen.htm
Nothing about the “ridge”, but a good read nevertheless.
A typical British design solution:
The navigator will be placed in a small compartment on the pilots right-hand side, entering through the service entrance, which I guess could have a small window so he can look up.
I bet the ridge had a more trivial reason. Maybe something with canopy hinges, or the locking system, that wouldn’t fit otherwise.
Nicely shaped aircraft all the same.
While I can’t fault the memorial…..I’m not so sure about the book.
I can just see the 2008 remake of ‘The Great Escape’:
Bartlett: “The first tunnel will go out due west from hut 123.”
MacDonald: “Sorry Roger, did you say the first tunnel?”
Bartlett: “Yes, we’re formulating a project with an initiative for developing and integrating solutions that leverage emerging technologies working with mission-critical solutions for a number of project deliverables utilising scarce resources in a dynamic and unpredictable environment!”
Sorry, couldn’t resist. 😮
Good to start the morning with a laugh 😀
🙂 just laughed out loud, first time all day ! – am doing some kits with my son at the moment, just a 1/72 scale tempest for me (first kit in…. ooo, 20 odd years) remembering how much better an airbrush is, then again I did leave the black outline of a 1/32 scale lysander wing on my bedroom carpet when I was a lad with spray pain ! BSG Junior is doing a Su-27 – and yes, there is a bonding (no pun intended) with it, I can still remember my first kit at his age (8) a Gnat, did it with my brother who did a P-40. Very vivid childhood memories, a bond with my son, so, yes, I’d go with this idea – bet you would find somebody at the local hospital with a Spitfire canopy glued to their hair or something ?
Fun memories…..although we used the REAL glue back then, the stuff you need a safety certificate for now.
My first was a Short Stirling inside a transparent globule of epoxy (at least thats how it turned out).
I have had an X-1 on the shelve for 3 years now…maybe THIS winter.
Have camera will travel. I have access to a half-decent camcorder and would like to make a 26 minute film themed on aviation, but I’m not sure what to make the film about. Most subjects have been covered. One idea is to make a film about plastic models and their influence on a generation. What do you think? Any other suggestions welcomed. Thinking of putting it on YouTube. Something to do this winter.
After re-reading your OP, I actually think the “Plastic model” documentary would be a good idea.
Most boys have had at least one attempt at glueing those together, and attampted to paint eye brows on a 1/72 pilot.
You can follow the history (from the first models) to todays super detailed “power models”. Also talk to users, from the hopeless amateur, to the semi-pro (super detailed, rivet patterns and god knows what).
I would watch it 😀
I know the RAF catalouges still exists (public records office I think). I have a very detailed Danish book, containing everything destroyed here (down to the last telephone).
Somebody here should be able to guide you to the RAF documentation in the UK.
Nevermind, back to TIGHAR….. :p
James Randi (http://www.randi.org/) has conducted a large number of double blind test with people who claim these divining rods work. None have been successful.
And thats despite James Randi has a 1 million $ reward for anyone who can prove such things under scientific testing.
People might like the rods for various reasons, but they do not work (other than as rods, which they are good at).
$14.95 can get you highly scientific location equipment suitable for wreck locating – “… locating misplaced items” – http://www.naturesprite.com/
The Midnight Blue finish is close to RAF Blue if you feel so inclined…
JEEZ!
Disclaimer:
The use of this device might actually make you stupid.
I’ll donate a few bob towards your education Tangmere1940. Just give me your full bank and personal details in a PM :diablo:
Its nice to be able to have a drink while in the air but the events in Madrid yesterday show the importance of sobriety whilst flying as a passenger. How the hell can you get out of an aircraft in an emergency if your drunk. Not ony are you puting yourself at risk but those around you in the event of an emergency.
I hope that more airlines start to manage the amount of alcohol thats drunk onboardsimilarly the airports should inform the airlines in they see someone knocking them back before flight.
I also hope that more airlines take civil action against those who force a diversion for being drunk and recover the extra fuel costs, airframe hours, staff wages etc of a diversion.
Steve
Airtravel is pretty safe, so focusing 100% on excape possibilities while flying, seems slightly over the top. I always enjoy a beer or two when flying (no im not a pilot :D).
Naturally you can’t have drunk passagers, but removing alcohol on the grounds of safety would be misusing (and thus undermining) the idea of aircraft safety.
There are people who “need” a few drinks to relax while flying. So instead of the occasional tipsy PAX, you might have a panic-stricken passanger (heartattack symptoms and perhaps another unscheduled landing – Oh, it has happened).
Airlines need to manage the alcohol consumption (as they legally have to, when serving alcohol) of their passangers. The Irish lads on the flight above, would either have been too drunk to enter the plane in Ireland, or they had been served on the plane (or been drinking their own booze). Either way, the airline staff could have prevented the events (Im not actually blaming them, just saying they could have managed the consumption).
I have yet to hear about an accident caused by a drunken passenger, or a drunken passenger causing further damage/death during an accident. Once they can prove drinking on aircraft is directly dangerous, then they can ban it on safety reasons – not before it can be proven, on the grounds of assumptions and heresay.
Lt. Col Elliott Roosevelt was Commanding Officer of the 3rd Photographic Group operating F-4/5 Lightnings and the 15 Photo Mapping Squadron using B-17’s assigned to the 12th Air Force. The Fortresse’s were used from Nov 1942 for one year . I claim that I think this is plausible to the story.
I’ll buy that :p
Well at least we can debunk the Roosevelt part of the story (even if we disregard the technical problems). There is no way the president would have time to take personal charge of individual operations. Even the Manhatten project did not have a direct presidental phoneline.
Unless we can get more information on the unused, but perfect airstrip, it will be hard to track anything about this story.
Strange things happened during the war, and its not impossible that something along these lines actually did take place (recalled by the Wing Commander in old age). But for him to be “hoodwinked” into thinking he was talking to Roosevelt, he would have had to be slightly drunk.
I have always wanted to see a documentary on the post-WWII aircraft disarmament/disposal.
Either the destruction of Luftwaffe in Europe, where the RAF disarmament wing was in charge of all luftwaffe material (and a considerable number of Luftwaffe personnel). It took them nearly two years to catalogue and destroy everything.
Or the US destruction of their own material in the Pacific, where they literally had islands full of aircraft just waiting for the smelter. It seems some even survived into the 70’s.
I just find it fascinating that these people worked in a “warzone” where all the soldiers had gone home. Kind of a ghostly time, where a small number of men worked in these gigantic “warehouses” scattered across the Pacific.
AFAIK none of these stories have been told before, but I guess its more archive work than actual filming, unless you want to film some of the survivors (aircraft) and perhaps interview personnel who took part.
If you take interest in the topic, I would be happy to give you some pointers as regards to information (although Im no historian).