dark light

Mondariz

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 1,411 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Any recommendations for a Normandy holiday? #1075991
    Mondariz
    Participant

    A tribute to the heroes of D-day…This former Aeronavale C-47 rests in the Airborne museum of the famous village of Saint Mere Eglise in France

    I would have flown in that C-47 (K-681) as a child – many times. Will be nice to see her again ๐Ÿ™‚

    in reply to: Any recommendations for a Normandy holiday? #1077557
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Thanks to everybody for their suggestions and advice.

    Iโ€™m going to make a few day trips specifically for World War II history and I will incorporate the sites you have mentioned. Iโ€™m considering visiting La Coupole (a V2 launch site) on my way home: has anyone been there?

    For literature Iโ€™m bringing Anthony Beevor D-Day: The Battle for Normandy. I have also ordered Major and Mrs. Holt’s Battlefield Guide to Normandy Landing Beaches from Amazon, but it has not arrived.

    Iโ€™ll be sure to take plenty of photographs.

    in reply to: Any recommendations for a Normandy holiday? #1078054
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Thank you very much Moggy. I’m already priming my GPS ๐Ÿ™‚

    in reply to: Any recommendations for a Normandy holiday? #1078226
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Oh.. and drink lots of Calvados.

    Moggy

    I plan to ๐Ÿ˜Ž

    in reply to: New airman War Dairy material – B-17 tailgunner #1093271
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Is that Dairy as in corner shop or cow shed ?

    Well, we can’t all be native speakers :p

    in reply to: Identity of nose section? #1110349
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Good job Al!

    These things drive me crazy and my head was spinning from clicking through the Flight Global Archive.

    in reply to: Identity of nose section? #1112201
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Unlikely to have such a prominent instrument panel (if that is what it is) in that case.

    Until now Iโ€™ve assumed that it was a military aircraft but there is no real reason to suggest that is there? The wooden panels stacked to the right look like they could be bulkheads and seem quite well constructed; could this indicate a civilian passenger aircraft?

    Is it not too glazed for a civilian aircraft?

    I have spent a few hours looking at every conceivable aircraft and have not seen this particular airframe. My feeling is that itโ€™s a prototype, or something even more obscure.

    in reply to: Identity of nose section? #1112359
    Mondariz
    Participant

    A stupid suggestion – but is it definitely an aircraft? Could it perhaps be part of some sort of gondola from a cable car or a fun fair??

    It really looks like aircraft structure, but I suppose it could be some sort of training device.

    Have the forum failed?

    Then it has all been for nothingโ€ฆ. ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: Identity of nose section? #1112469
    Mondariz
    Participant

    The photo is from 1942 and depicts a person in German uniform. That does not sound like a Hotspur Glider to me.

    in reply to: Identity of nose section? #1113262
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Breguet 690?

    in reply to: Astonishing footage…. #1131997
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Thanks for that Andy but McAfee comes up with a heavy security warning when I attempt to use your link …

    Here is the direct link to youtube:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bMxWaJIJIw

    Buscatube basically just link to youtube videos and try to earn some revenue on other peoples content.

    in reply to: Metadiscussion: "Hercules C-130" etc #1142987
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Am I missing something here or is this the most pedantic and pointless thread that I have ever wasted my time reading?
    Can you really be that knarked about journalists getting designations and names in absolutely the correct order. I’ve worked with servicemen who use the same names.
    The F-4 was called the Phantom II in US Navy service, apart from the F-4K/M being the British Phantom, and is the Hercules not the C-130K/J and the C-47 the USAAF designation for the Dakota?

    No you are not missing anything pagen, this is the most pedantic and pointless thread ever ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: Spits down B17 #1144059
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Or the misterious case of the Harrier some years back on a test flight that continued flying out to sea minus pilot and canopy but still containing the ejector seat. Was intercepted by a Nimrod and photographed after contact with pilot was lost.

    Eventually crashed into sea and was too deep to recover. Never did find the pilot or find out how he left the aircraft or why?

    Mark

    EDIT:- Just found this elswere on another forum after a brief search that sort of conferms my post.:-

    As I recall this was an early GR5 on a test flight from Dunsfold. As far as I remember the investigation concluded that the pilot had adjusted the height of the seat after take-off, and before commencing a timed climb. Unfortunately there was a loose item in the cockpit, assumed to have been a torch on a coiled lead, that fell under the back of the parachute firing mechanism (not the seat) As the pilot adjusted the seat, the object triggered parachute sear to fire. This fired the drogue chute through the canopy, pulling the main chute with it. Sadly the pilot was then bodily pulled from the seat through the canopy. He sustained fatal injuries. His body was later found on Salisbury Plain.

    The aircraft flew on, pilotless, westward over the Atlantic. London Military managed to vector a USAF C5 close enough to the Harrier so they could video the aircraft. Must have been quite a sight, broken canopy but ejector seat still in place and no pilot.

    The a/c flew on over the Ocean, endangering no-one. Finally it ran out of fuel and crashed into the sea.

    I remember reading this in Air Clues (a RAF accident investigation magazine, I think that was the name). Poor guy.

    in reply to: Spits down B17 #1144090
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Thanks for all your input chaps ,so it looks like it more than likely could or did happen.
    maybe the records would play down this sort of thing ? .
    It make you wonder if the spit pilots got a share of a kill ;)…..
    Thanks everyone for your iteresting and prompt replys.

    You only get kills for enemy aircraft – otherwise it would be too easy ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: Spits down B17 #1144985
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Itโ€™s certainly possible. This B-36 flew for hours after the crew bailed, before finally crashing.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1950_British_Columbia_B-36_crash

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 1,411 total)