dark light

Mondariz

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,036 through 1,050 (of 1,411 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: He-111 (Casa) centerline pod question #1223014
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Thats a very good and logical guess.

    Somewhat strange they didn’t try to hide the smoke generator, but thats movie people for you.

    Any other guesses, or maybe people who worked on the set.

    in reply to: Göteborg Aero Show 2008, August 30-31 #1226306
    Mondariz
    Participant

    If you drive up from Hamburg (along the black line), there is only a short detour to Staving aircraft museum (big X on the map).

    Once on Sjælland (the island next to sweden) you can get a ferry across right where the Technical museum is (where i attempted to make an X).

    Both are more or less on your route, and both are worth a visit.

    http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x217/MONDARIZDK/50.gif

    in reply to: Göteborg Aero Show 2008, August 30-31 #1226413
    Mondariz
    Participant

    If you give me a general travel plan for Denmark, I will make a few suggestions along the route. Although Denmark is quite small and a museum detour likely to be small.

    in reply to: Vintage Aircraft of the Future #1226674
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Very interesting thread, and it prompts the question what is vintage, what is classic? any ideas? What are the “official” definitions?

    Good question.

    I know that for motorcycles (in Denmark at least) its more or less a question of insurance (the closest to an official definition). More than 25 years is classic, more than 50 years is vintage.

    My own difinition of vintage aircraft, is anything before 1930. And for classic aircraft its between 1930 and 1960. But its not something I normally use for classification.

    Surely a museum person must have a more solid difinition.

    in reply to: Göteborg Aero Show 2008, August 30-31 #1226689
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Denmark has two museums:

    http://www.flymuseum.dk/

    Has an airshow 14. juni 2008. Good collection too.

    http://www.tekniskmuseum.dk/

    No airshow, but a small interesting collection.

    The Danish Air Force has a show 8 June 2008.

    http://forsvaret.dk/FLV-Aabenthus/

    Normally a very good show.

    in reply to: WW2 Bunker With Three Disassembled Aircraft! #1226693
    Mondariz
    Participant

    There is a possibility, that someone will find WWII relics that have avoided the smelter. Most likely not in a state authorised storage bunker.

    But buying a CD containing powerpoint presentation, might not be the best way to find them. If these people actually have research about an extended bunker system (even without aircraft) I’m pretty sure they could see print. I for one have one or two books about German bunkers, and would also buy one about a cold war bunker system (if such a thing existed).

    Selling a powerpoint presentation, is basically selling nothing.

    in reply to: WW2 Bunker With Three Disassembled Aircraft! #1227245
    Mondariz
    Participant

    “just a bunch of unstable, deteriorating ordnance under the runway of a major regional airport”

    Thats exactly where you want that kind of stuff. Maybe thats why no one moved it.

    in reply to: Göteborg Aero Show 2008, August 30-31 #1227393
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Great!

    I’m going.

    in reply to: WW2 Bunker With Three Disassembled Aircraft! #1227634
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Rubbish!

    in reply to: EE Lightnings – How Many Live Examples in the UK? #1228828
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Taxying and take off.

    I seem to remember an older issue of “Air clues”, with a story about a technician somewhere in the UK, who took a lightning for a quick flight. From memory the story goes:

    During high speed taxying another aircraft appeared on the runway (landing or taking off), he had two options; to crash into the aircraft, or to take off and fly over – he choose the latter. Did a close circuit and came back down again.

    Does anyone have more on this (or have i been dreaming again)?

    in reply to: Vintage Aircraft of the Future #1228837
    Mondariz
    Participant

    I think people really need to start specializing more, i love seeing spits fly, but everytime i hear about another project to get a spit flying, i think that surely the money could be better spent on other rarer aircraft, unless someone has a desire to recreat mallory’s ‘big wing’

    I feel the same, but also understand the appeal of the Spit/Mustang/Bf-109.

    If i had to restore an aircraft, I would be likely to choose an aircraft that is already flying. There are people to talk to and the authorities have already dealt with such a project. Trying to restore a type, which has not been airworthy since the war, will create all sorts of problems. Luckily people still do that, but its easy to see how the beaten track is the most comfortable.

    in reply to: Vintage Aircraft of the Future #1229250
    Mondariz
    Participant

    I fancy LL is right about the jets, however I can’t envisage an airshow demand for Tucanos and Hawks neither, both stalwart RAF trainers, but hardly what a crowd is dying to see perform.

    I think you are right most of the way, but even Tucanos and Hawks will be rare birds at some stage. Once their active servicelife is over, they will be missed at airshows.

    Restoring and flying vintage aircraft has always been about vision. Dismissing even the idea of a private F-15 (although it might seem impossible now) will not produce anything. At some stage they will be as rare and exotic as a Bf-109 is today. People who flew and saw them in their youth, might want to relive their past, just as many WWII warbirds started their 2nd life.

    Flying current fighter aircraft as private jets in the future might be improbable, but I wouldnt go as far, as saying its impossible.

    in reply to: Mystery Deck Landing Accident ;-) #1229508
    Mondariz
    Participant

    During the Battle of Yavin, Squadron commander Wedge Antilles was forced to withdraw due to battle damage. He skillfully piloted his X-wing fighter (S/N 9907701)back to Yavin, but due to a faulty navigation droid his landing left somthing to be desired. Luckily the skidding fighter was stopped, when it collided with a group of bystanders.

    Regarding the battle of Yavin:

    Uncomfortable Questions about the Death Star Attack

    1) Why were a handful of rebel fighters able to penetrate the defenses of a battle station that had the capability of destroying an entire planet and the defenses to ward off several fleets of battle ships?

    2) Why did Grand Moff Tarkin refuse to deploy the station’s large fleet of TIE Fighters until it was too late? Was he acting on orders from somebody to not shoot down the rebel attack force? If so, who, and why?

    3) Why was the rebel pilot who supposedly destroyed the Death Star reported to be on the Death Star days, maybe hours, prior to its destruction? Why was he allowed to escape, and why were several individuals dressed in Stormtrooper uniforms seen helping him?

    4) Why has there not been an investigation into allegations that Darth Vader, the second-ranking member of the Imperial Government, is in fact the father of the pilot who allegedly destroyed the Death Star?

    5) Why did Lord Vader decide to break all protocols and personally pilot a lightly armored TIE Fighter? Conveniently, this placed Lord Vader outside of the Death Star when it was destroyed, where he was also conveniently able to escape from a large-sized rebel fleet that had just routed the Imperial forces. Why would Lord Vader, one of the highest ranking members of the Imperial Government, suddenly decide to fly away from the Death Star in the middle of a battle? Did he know something that the rest of the Imperial Navy didn’t?

    6) How could any pilot shoot a missile into a 2 meter-wide exhaust port, let alone a pilot with no formal training, whose only claim to fame was his ability to “bullseye womprats” on Tatooine? This shot, according to one pilot, would be “impossible, even for a computer.” Yet, according to additional evidence, the pilot who allegedly fired the missile turned off his targeting computer when he was supposedly firing the shot that destroyed the Death Star. Why have these discrepancies never been investigated, let alone explained?

    7) Why has their been no investigation into evidence that the droids who provided the rebels with the Death Star plans were once owned by none other than Lord Vader himself, and were found, conveniently, by the pilot who destroyed the Death Star, and who is also believed to be Lord Vader’s son? Evidence also shows that the droids were brought to one Ben Kenobi, who, records indicate, was Darth Vader’s teacher many years earlier! Are all these personal connections between the conspirators and a key figure in the Imperial government supposed to be coincidences?

    8) How could a single missile destroy a battle station the size of a moon? No records, anywhere, show that any battle station or capital ship has ever been destroyed by a single missile. Furthermore, analysis of the tape of the last moments of the Death Star show numerous small explosions along its surface, prior to it exploding completely! Why does all evidence indicate that strategically placed explosives, not a single missile, is what destroyed the Death Star?

    in reply to: Vintage Aircraft of the Future #1229525
    Mondariz
    Participant

    You might be right about the rough cut-off date.

    Perhaps it will result in a shift towards taxiable fighters. Although I can’t really see people paying too much simply to taxi an aircraft. Operating a taxiable F-15 might be equal in cost, to operating an airworthy Spitfire.

    The current frontline fighters seem destined to fade away as their servicelife comes to an end. They are not the first to do so.

    in reply to: What Aircraft Would you get Running Again? #1230002
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Just from the top of my head:

    The Heinkel He 162 at Hendon.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,036 through 1,050 (of 1,411 total)