dark light

VeeOne

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 397 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: UFO or not #1864114
    VeeOne
    Participant

    I think it is ballistic bird droppings heading directly for your position. Or swamp gas. Then again, it could be Venus.

    Actually it does look like some sort of lens based glitch rather than an actual object. If you notice there is a smaller second one to the left. Was that the direction the sun was in? Because if so there is your answer. If you look at the silver-white balls (i.e. UFOs whatever they will turn our to actually be), seen and videoed by tens of thousands of people in Brazil and Mexico they are sharp and clear whereas this is less so. Compare it’s clarity against the jet airliner and you will see what I mean. 🙂

    in reply to: Aegean at NWI 17/5/11 #488804
    VeeOne
    Participant

    G-JACS nice! It reminds me of Archer G-BUMP I used to fly way back when it was all shiney and swish.

    in reply to: Final flights of the Douglas DC-8s #488807
    VeeOne
    Participant

    Lovely to see the old livery DC8-50 picture from 1969. 🙂

    in reply to: UFO over Heathrow? #488812
    VeeOne
    Participant

    Ballistic bird crap…

    Didn’t realise bird droppings could reach ballistic velocities. 😉

    Your certainty makes you sound like a minimalist scientist type. 🙂

    Wish I could be so certain about reality. Apart from modern scientists of the only other group of people who show such absolute certainty about reality is the Jehovah’s Witnesses. It must be just cluckin’ to have a true belief. If I had that I’d not have to think for myself at all, sweeeet, as the Cartman says! (If you don’t know who Cartman is you must be one of those sensible, grown-ups I am always criticised by. :))

    I suspect the majority of us chickens have some uncertainty about stuff, and are forced to remain more open minded about phenomena we don’t yet understand. 😉

    I would suggest that it is through the cracks in the current scientific paradigm that we glimpse the new scientific paradigm to come in the future. I am not so bright though, so I might be wrong. 😉

    in reply to: UFO over Heathrow? #488816
    VeeOne
    Participant

    Could it have been a mark “Mirror” inside the camera?.

    Lincoln .7

    If so why not on any other image?

    in reply to: UFO over Heathrow? #488817
    VeeOne
    Participant

    I had this once…….

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/album.php?albumid=222&pictureid=1683

    Baz

    Those weather balloons will fool you every time. 🙂

    in reply to: Couple of olduns #488884
    VeeOne
    Participant

    Lovely pictures John..i’ve some from the fifties and sixties somewhere..i’ll have to have a search and see if i can scan them

    I have some Worldways photos from Gatwick I think… 🙂

    Boeing 707
    http://i850.photobucket.com/albums/ab64/raggidoll/aviation/WorldwaysCanada707c-gflglgw82sarah-2.jpg

    DC-8-63
    http://i850.photobucket.com/albums/ab64/raggidoll/aviation/WorldwaysCanadaDC8-63c-fcpplgw83sarah-1.jpg

    in reply to: British Jetliners 1 – TRIDENT and VC-10 #489021
    VeeOne
    Participant

    Hi Sarah…no problem re Trident’s as you can tell im a bit of a fan..lol

    The Hatfield BKS trident shows the tail markings well! Must be the snow changing the white colour balance. 🙂
    Your website for the Trident is worthy of the aeroplane. I recall seeing a Trident 2 in new half-flag livery (1968) fly over my home as a child. It looked so futuristic. The Trident had more wing sweepback than other jet types of the time, I think. It looked really something back then with the red wings and union flag on the tail.

    I particularly liked the way the undercarraige worked with the offset nose wheel and the main gear twisting as it came in. British over engineering maybe but one of those things that makes an aeroplane likeable and memorable. When an early model Boeing 737 flew over you could see the tyres in the bays when the gear was up! No main gear doors. Quite a step down from the Trident’s design.

    In fact, the red-wing BEA Tridents were so common overhead that when one flew over with silver wings it was surprising (and probably Iraqi Airways). It is only now, looking back from 45 years on, that the Trident looks more old fashioned. But I vividly recall how it looked back in the mid to late 1960s and it was a very elegant, raked-wing shape from underneath with the gear up.

    Have you looked closely at the tail of the Trident at Duxford? I think the wording TRIDENT on engine no.2 is the wrong font. It isn’t quite right to my eyes.

    Here are a few images I acquired from my Airline History Website days…

    Sarah 🙂

    PR photo by BEA for Trident 3b (1971 I think)
    http://i850.photobucket.com/albums/ab64/raggidoll/BEATrident3BAdvert1971.jpg

    PR Poster by BEA for introduction of new Trident 1c (1965) – (the other side of the poster showed a Trident in flight)
    http://i850.photobucket.com/albums/ab64/raggidoll/Tridentposterside1.jpg

    Advert for BEA Trident equipped with Decca Navigator area nav system in BEA in-flight magazine (circa 1966 I believe)
    http://i850.photobucket.com/albums/ab64/raggidoll/deccaTrident.jpg

    in reply to: More Turboprop oldies #489056
    VeeOne
    Participant

    they were 2 different aircraft, BSST was 002 XDN was 003 or 004

    Really, I am gobsmacked. All these years I thought I’d seen the same jet back then. I was certain (but wrong I guess). Where is G-BSST now?

    in reply to: Incident at MAN #480612
    VeeOne
    Participant

    ah that would be after i landed there yesterday then 😀

    You must have flared a bit too high! 🙂

    but no, that would have made 2 holes in the runway!?

    VeeOne
    Participant

    And here is me thinking this only happened in the thin air of the cruise. Awsome and frightening video! :O

    in reply to: New Cuts to Military Hardware news news news #2340912
    VeeOne
    Participant

    I was calling scorpion a sweetie, not myself. LOL

    We seem to see lots of cuts in military these days, the latest one the Sentinel Gulfstream intel jet. But I am not being serious here. 🙂

    in reply to: London Airport aerial photo #489064
    VeeOne
    Participant

    would say closest 707 is a 436 while the one further aways is a 300 series

    Looking at the bigger version I agree. the far jet is a super vc-10 but the nearest 707 has different engines (not RR) and an undertail fin). I think this might have been one of the two original BOAC 707s that went to BEA Airtours in 1972 and I think they were registered g-apf something.

    in reply to: London Airport aerial photo #489068
    VeeOne
    Participant

    Here is a direct link to the larger source picture…

    http://i850.photobucket.com/albums/ab64/raggidoll/aviation/BOACvc10and707sLHR70hotelstands.jpg

    click the link. When the picture shows right-click and choose

    save Picture as…

    it will save it to your computer.

    Sarah 🙂

    in reply to: British Jetliners 2 – CONCORDE #489078
    VeeOne
    Participant

    British prototype Concorde 002/G-AXDN at Filton.

    http://i850.photobucket.com/albums/ab64/raggidoll/other/Concorde002G-BSST.jpg
    Public release photo; copyright British Aircraft Corporation

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 397 total)