dark light

nordjet415

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 68 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BA results 2007-8 #534996
    nordjet415
    Participant

    Hi.

    I am in ageement here, fantastic results made possible by cutting back on unprofitable routes and being more cost effective.

    I am not a B.A.basher and have always been proud of our national airline, and get annoyed when I hear B.A. being called ” London Airways”

    B.A. would not be announcing these impressive results if it was still operating regional services out of places like Leeds, Inverness, Liverpool etc, and international flights from Glasgow etc.

    Hats off to Wille Walsh for not taking his bonus.

    in reply to: BA discontinuing Manchester to JFK #536267
    nordjet415
    Participant

    its a shame B.A. are dropping this service, but according to B.A. its not making money, a sign of the times. They obviously feel the gatwick service replacing it to JFK will be more profitable.

    in reply to: Terminal 5 News / Information / Musings #542081
    nordjet415
    Participant

    Future Heathrow Problems

    Hi all.

    In my opinion, even after the fall out from the laughable T5 problems are solved, I can see B.A. flights being delayed even more than they have been up to now.

    If using 27L / 27R for departures, all B.A. flights leaving T5 will have a very long taxi to the departure runways where lots of other aircraft will be waiting to depart, add this to the fact that some passengers will have to be bussed to the aircraft at T5, it makes you wonder if ANY B.A. flight will leave on time.

    Lets face it, Heathrow even with T5 is a dinosaur, cramped, a lack of runway capacity, over crowded and run by BAA ! A new airport should have been built years ago at the Thames estury.

    As usual, this country can not get it right, from MRSA in Hospitals, the criminal Justice system, immigration, asbos, etc etc….its just a long list of total incompetance, a laughing stock…..the GREAT has definately gone from our country.

    in reply to: Terminal 5 News / Information / Musings #542321
    nordjet415
    Participant

    4th biggest economy in the world and we have a flag ship airport at breaking point, a new terminal 5 that does not work……typical incompetant Britain, we cant get anything right !

    in reply to: Upper limit of jetliner size? #547049
    nordjet415
    Participant

    re

    I also recently flew on an A340-600 and during some moderate turbulance over the south china sea, it felt like the plane was not in one piece !! sounds hard to believe, but it felt like a bending motion, I have heard that Airbus have incorperated some kind of damping device whereas during turbulance the computers ride with the turbulance and make minor adjustments to trim to help the aircraft through it.

    I can not really see aircraft getting much longer, but who knows.

    Did you experience what I felt in the A340-600 ?

    Regards
    Nordjet415

    in reply to: BA in Europe… #564775
    nordjet415
    Participant

    Yes B(ritish..not London)A should operate from regional airports, they CLAIM to be the national carrier for Britain.. NOT just London… You serve to highlight how much an embarrasment they really are, if you have to go back 20-30 years in timetables to see when they were a national airline.
    Not suggesting they serve places like Dingwall,Cambridge,Blackpool etc.. to Europe or god forbid further, but, they pulled many many lucrative routes from major cities simply because they wanted to streamline everything thru London,for example, at my local Glasgow,the 4th biggest city in the UK, has ZERO flights that use the callsign Speedbird, not one BA flight leaves the UK,in fact only 3 routes leave Scotland… all to… wait for it….. LONDON! the end result of pulling out of the regions, foreign airlines grabbed the market with inflated prices.
    BA are NOT and apparently never will be again, a national airline for the UK!
    (at least not the small bit that is outwith the M25)

    B.A. did not pull out of regional cities to streamline everything through Heathrow, they did it to stop constant losses, perhaps if you go back to before B.A. were privatised, you would find that the airline was making huge losses and by the early 80s and 90s were forced to pull out of loss making routes.
    B.A. are and always will be identified as the national carrier of the UK.

    If you had your way, B.A. would be flying unprofitable routes from Glasgow and other regional cities at a loss…..after a while and after much debt…the airline simply wont exist. this is the 21st century, B.A. like many other big airlines have had to make hard decisions…..why do you think they stopped flying Concorde ??? same reasons ……losses.

    in reply to: BA in Europe… #565517
    nordjet415
    Participant

    Oh dear, yet more attacks on B.A….Ooooppss, London Airways.

    Do the previous posters believe that B.A. should operate out of other regional airports such as Inverness, Leeds/Bradford, Liverpool etc etc…..???? well they used to operate from many regional airports but made cuts to save itself from massive losses.

    British Airways is British Airways, always will be and will never be London Airways, the fact that B.A. no longer operate from most regional airports is not a reason to call it London Airways. I suggest you dig out some 1970s and 80s timetables where you will see how many regional airports B.A. used to operate from.

    Regards
    Nordjet415

    in reply to: 4 engines at the rear…. #565962
    nordjet415
    Participant

    re 4 engines

    I seem to remember A VC10 being fitted with an RB211 on one side, and 2 conways on the other side of the fuslage, think it was G-AXLR, I dont recall any problems with engine mounts / bending of pylons etc.

    I think a VC10 would be fine with 2 x RB211 535E4s rated at around
    44,ooolbs thrust, or a derated Tristar RB211 22B engine. what a shame this was not thought of back when the RB211 was first produced.

    Regards
    Nordjet415

    in reply to: Philippines into Heathrow? #572087
    nordjet415
    Participant

    re philippines

    Yes president Gloria Macapagal of the Philippines is doing a European tour.

    Shame there is no direct air link between the 2 countries.

    in reply to: BA and MAN #573780
    nordjet415
    Participant

    Re B.A

    Why are we constantly B.A. bashing ??

    Some posting on here are seem to wish we were back in the late 70s and early 80s
    I remember LBA in the late 70s, B.A operated Viscounts to LHR, DUB, AMS,
    JER, BEL, then BMA took over only the Heathrow route, but look at LBA now, B.A have long gone from there, but Jet2 is now the dominant airline, BMA have expanded, so my point is, in most cases, where B.A. withdraw from regional airports, other airlines take the routes over, base aircraft there and increase destinations.

    As I mentioned on a previous post, B.A. could simply not keep services out of regional airports like LBA, Inverness, Jersey, they simply would not be profitable anymore. If cuts had not been made, where would B.A. be today.

    In this day and age, cuts have to be made, Concorde is a prime example.

    Regards
    Nordjet415

    in reply to: BA and MAN #575213
    nordjet415
    Participant

    Re B.A.

    well, my answer to that is, ( to those calling B.A London Airways )

    If B.A had carried on basing aircraft at places like Leeds, Liverpool, Isle of Man, Cardiff, Inverness, Jersey, Guensey and so on, the airline would probably not be around today.
    Like most, B.A. have made cuts and left the the thinner routes to other carriers.
    I agree there should be some B.A. expansion from Manchester, but where to ? Maybe Los Angeles and perhaps Bangkok.
    I remember B.A doing a Larnaca schedule but eventually this was blocked by the greedy Cypriots who were protecting Cyprus Airways, but they do now fly to Paphos in the guise of GB Airways.

    B.A. has its critics, but its continual profits are due to careful planning, getting rid of loss making routes and minimising waste. You only have to look at Airlines like Alitalia, Olympic and some of the U.S. carriers ( who are up to their eyes in debt) to see why they are in this position and B.A are not.

    Perhaps we should ask Willie Walsh to send a few B744s to man to open up new long haul routes purely for us enthusiasts !!

    On a more serious note, the latest Manchester Airport magazine actually states that the airport flies to more destinations than any other airport, so I really dont see what the problem is. B.A. know what they are doing and as far as I am aware, will continue to support Man.

    Regards

    Nordjet415

    in reply to: If I could bring them back, I would. #581506
    nordjet415
    Participant

    re

    Well, what about Air UK, with their Heralds and F27s, BIA Heralds, Air Anglia DC3s and F27s Cambrian Airways Viscounts and 1-11s, Northeast Airlines Viscounts and Tridents.

    in reply to: Unflown planes #583943
    nordjet415
    Participant

    RE 787

    Like all new and untested airliners, there are always delays, but the 787 will fly, there is no way it will never fly

    Regards

    Nordjet415

    in reply to: Man T3 protest?? #586902
    nordjet415
    Participant

    re protests

    And of course, none of these so called climate change protesters have ever flown before ! ????????

    in reply to: Heathrow behind the times #502970
    nordjet415
    Participant

    re Heathrow

    Sorry folks.

    Misprint. I mean Heathrow runways 27 left and 27 right, not 28L AND 28R

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 68 total)