Having looked at the image close up ( zoomed in ) it would seem the Japan 777 is higher than the A310, Its very hard to say if this is a near miss. Every day you see trails of high flying aircraft crossing our skies and sometimes it appears that one or two aircraft seem to get very close to each other, The photo looks to be a near miss, but my guess is that the A310 is a good 1,000ft below. I would be interested to see what distance the planes would look if the JAL777 was an A310, then you would be able to see if there is any difference in size of each aircraft, that would then determine if they really are that close. I may be wrong, anyone else !!!!! ????
The one thing I find hard to comprehend with reinforced plastic fuslages is the pressurisation process, aircraft fuslages on traditional aluminiam skins expands during presurisation, so how will this constant flexing of composite materials affect the life of the fuslage. also, what would happen to this material if for example the fuselage was hit by a baggage truck, catering wagon or air bridge, a dent would appear on a metal fuselage which would be easily spotted, how could damage be spotted on composite materials, or how would they know ( if no surface damage is visible ) that there is no structural damage.
Damaged panals or fatigued parts on metal airliners can easilybe replaced or repaired, but how can a composite fuselage be repaired, its not as if you can cut out the bad part and replace it with a new piece.
No doubt Boeing know what they are doing, but from us of less an engineering background, it seems a grey area.
re cyprus airways
Yes, Helios still fly despite the poor publicity with the disaster earlier in the year
re cyprus airways
Agree, it seems that competition is strong on this route, not to mention the amount of charter flights to and from Cyprus by the British Tour operators,
Lets hope they survive.
I dont think there is any difference in the type, Look at the Vickers Viscount, there were various marks for different airlines, ie, V757s for Air Canada V701s for BEA, but at the end of the day, they were V700 srs Viscounts.
Same applies to Boeing aircraft, B757 236 is the same as a B757 225, its simply a 757 200 srs.
I beleive this applies to Airbus aswell in most respects
Hey whats all the fuss about the age of G-CPEV ?? I dont care if its 20 years old, so long as its well maintained and flying for a good airline, its not a problem.
An older plane is just as safe as a new one…….what about the old Viscounts British Air Ferries operated ???? These were 1958 vintage but were still going strong in 1996 until retirement, bet they were as safe as G-CPEV and I bet G-CPEV is as safe as
G-BOAC sat at Manchester !!!
Never fear an older plane !!
Why not watch Airline on itv ? you will see the good and bad side.
regards
Nordjet415
Please stop the B.A. bashing, yes, they may have higher fares, but we should be proud of our national airline with that wonderful tail logo.
B.A is a well run airline ( if you excuse the recent strike ) it makes a good profit, has a good safety record, most of its flights ( if you check teletext ) are normally on time.
The question to everyone must be: A B.A 767 to New York from Manchester or a Jet2 757 to New York from Manchester ( I know Jet2 dont fly that route, just for arguments sake though ) who would you rather fly with ?. a cramped 757 that should have 186 seats but actually has 235, no free meal etc, or pay the extra and go in comfort in a B.A.767 with more leg room and free food.
cheers
Nordjet415