dark light

Charley

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 203 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Charley
    Participant

    i was a keen collector of biggles books as a kid, you used to be able to pick them up for about 5p in jumble sales, along with other classics like eagle annuals. they are all still stashed in my parents loft!
    did anyone else read the space books that w.e. johns did?…i thought they were great, and always wished he’d written more of them.

    Yes, I enjoyed his Sci-fi books too. All of WE Johns books are worth a read though, as is John Pearson’s “biography” of Biggles. (Surely Biggles is a contender for “the pilots who flew in both world wars” thread?)

    in reply to: Vickers/Besa Aircraft Gun #1425970
    Charley
    Participant

    IIRC Webley Semi-Auto pistols were made up to the sixties in a variety of calibres. IMHO very well made but not not such good designs as Browning’s.

    When did the USA start fitting fifty-calibre MGs on aircraft? I presume the first to carry them was the early B17 but which was the first .50 fighter? When I look at a Browning MG I see excellent use of space and weight, products by Vickers or the Besa seem slightly archaic by comparison.

    in reply to: Vickers/Besa Aircraft Gun #1426605
    Charley
    Participant

    Revolvers: In the days when it was possible to, I tried out almost every type of pistol that would have been available in the ETO in WW2 and felt that German, Italian and US product was superior. Only my opinion, though. Webley did make a semi-auto, I felt it was robust and simple but not as good as anything designed by John Browning.

    MGs: Which brings me back to the original post. I think that the Browning MG seems to have been an exceptional design and our pilots were lucky to have it. Shame about the rifle calibre at the start of the war though.

    in reply to: Vickers/Besa Aircraft Gun #1426663
    Charley
    Participant

    I think that the Lewis was also an American invention. Britain had very productive gun industries but not such good designs (e.g. Enfield revolvers v. superior S&W or Colt product).

    in reply to: Thunder & Lightnings – Sad News #1427595
    Charley
    Participant

    I also recommend “Conrad’s War” by Andrew Davies (I believe he is the same writer who adapts classic novels for TV).

    in reply to: Southend Bombing Map #1427765
    Charley
    Participant

    Does the map include attacks on the former RAF Rochford?

    in reply to: Approving Junk. #1427773
    Charley
    Participant

    & then there is the contamination aspect from the BB’s being in direct contact with *stuff* while inside the sphere… I sure as hell wouldn’t be picking them up…

    I am assured that Strike Command provided “Gloves, Rubber, For the use of” to those engaged in this task.

    in reply to: Approving Junk. #1336917
    Charley
    Participant

    that did occur, but that was just a system being late into service, so its not really relevant.

    But it (“Blue Circle”) is very funny, though.

    in reply to: Approving Junk. #1336920
    Charley
    Participant

    Skomer-u.net.com: β€œTo prevent the bomb “going up” in storage or while on alert, the hollow sphere was filled with hundreds of ball bearings. Even if the explosive detonated the ball bearings would prevent the plutonium sphere imploding, thereby preventing a chain reaction. These were inserted through a hole in the bomb casing. The downside of this was that the balls had to be removed prior to arming the weapon, which meant the hole had to be at the bottom and stopped with a rubber bung. If the bung fell out the bearings would pour all over the floor, with not only the usual comic results, but leaving a live nuclear weapon to deal with while the crews skidded about. Strike Command were unimpressed and most of their comments were unrepeatable.”
    QUOTE]

    Surely a game for “Extreme It’s A Knockout”?

    in reply to: Which Vulcan would you like to see runnable…. #1337061
    Charley
    Participant

    Gotta be the one with the best combat history – is that the one kept at Waddington?

    in reply to: Approving Junk. #1337066
    Charley
    Participant

    Reading Alertken’s initial post made my brain hurt. Then I read it again. There are some points of interest concealed within. My favourite is the nuclear missile that had a range of 2km but a lethal radius of 2.5km. That made me laugh out loud.

    in reply to: disgraced squadrons? #1337685
    Charley
    Participant

    I find it hard to believe this is true.

    Why woudl the RAF impose this mark of disgrace on a whole squadron, including presumably those groundrew who had been left behind? Why not just drop the squadron number totally and form a new squadron under another number? Why not court martial or otherwise punish officers who had shown cowardice? And isn’t the association of the colour yellow with cowardice an American tradition not a British one?

    in reply to: Cosford's Valiant #1340125
    Charley
    Participant

    Perhaps Manchester has some suitable flights? I think it’s no more than an houre from Cosford by rail or road. There’s lots to see up here in the western midlands: Cosford, MAM, Thinktank, Boulton-Paul. Feel free to come over. We’re not all hoolies and pikies (though you may meet some).

    in reply to: The Cosford / BA Collection thread #1340128
    Charley
    Participant

    Not strictly relevant to the main thrust of the thread, but I was told recently that the sudden deficit in many large organisations’ Final Salary Pension funds has been brought about by a change in the way the fund value and fund commitments must be written into the comapny’s finacial statements. I.e. in some cases the fund is not in as serious a position as it now appears on the “books”, but the rule change in the way assets and liabilites in funds must now be calculated and declared in Company balance sheets has lead to the sudden spate in reported “problems” with so many pension funds.

    (To any accountants out there, sorry if the terminology is incorrect, or if this info is totally wrong – I’m a tecchy not a bean counter.)

    So, perhaps this change in financial regs hads given some organisations a convenient “excuse” to allow them to drop projects they no longer wish to fund?

    Paul F

    I work in the pensions business and think that the points you make are essentially correct (including your conclusion). BA was also subsidised by the taxpayer for many decades so I think as a company they owe something to the public. And how better to express that gratitude than by maintaining an historic collection for all to see?

    in reply to: ME-262 Air to Air Kills #1340933
    Charley
    Participant

    I suppose by 1945 the 262’s were operating in a very “target rich” environment and there was plenty to shoot at, despite their operating problems.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 203 total)