dark light

Camaro

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 461 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Peruvian Mig-29 info #2664381
    Camaro
    Participant

    [QUOTE=F5M]Hehe good one Camaro!! ๐Ÿ˜€
    Ah dont be so severe with my love F5 . Sure mig 29 and F16 are much more maneuverable than it but F5 is too still nowadays . US uses it to teach TopGun Pilots . And F5 has a much better cockipt visibility than the Mig 21 as showed a recent article in Ariforce Monthly but probally the Mig 29 is better ( surely F16 is )

    dont worry F-5 brother, i didnt mean to hurt your F-5 lady (airplanes are our ladies ๐Ÿ˜‰ ) she’s good looking, in fact i wouldnt mind flying a couple of 6g. maneouvers with her ๐Ÿ˜Ž .
    about that article, yes i have it too and its visibility is just “not as bad” i just never said “worst”, somebody else did.

    c’mon condor, leave A-29 alone !
    concentrate on the main dish… ๐Ÿ™‚
    fach has nothing to challenge and “worst” defeat FAP “as it is now” ๐Ÿ˜‰
    and as for the “super F-16” (still 1 1/2 years to be real), dont worry, FAP will have something “under the sleeve” ๐Ÿ˜Ž
    Camaro.

    in reply to: Kleine Brogel Spotters Day 20-07-2004 #2664825
    Camaro
    Participant

    ahhh, the old An-26, i love it, i (in my youth) had a good 2 days joyriding at the nav. station (the one with the big bubble on the left)…boy it was fun, you guys should try it once. ๐Ÿ™‚
    BTW i saved the pics, awesome!!!
    thanks for sharing.
    Camaro

    in reply to: Peruvian Mig-29 info #2664828
    Camaro
    Participant

    [QUOTE=A-29] Chile and Argentina have a long dispute in who is the most “european” country in South America, you know what i mean?

    ๐Ÿ˜€ ๐Ÿ˜€ ๐Ÿ˜€ good one A-29!!! ๐Ÿ˜€ ๐Ÿ˜€ ๐Ÿ˜€

    ok condorito, lets see.
    what’s the falcon gonna do? ah! ok, the peruvians are comming, this way…and get the hell out of there? i dont see much advantage on this, and by the way, you’re talking a crappy 707, with an A check every 50 hrs, so be careful how you use it, and have your friends open any engine cowl for ya…look at the combustion chamber external core, and (just for the fun) tell me how many weldings over weldings can you see? yes crack weldings, so much for your flag ship. (we’re talking JT3 engines)
    Peru has none? so who cares, ground radars are enough.

    Are you kidding?. M2Ks are just as capable as a Chilean Pantera. The sitting ducks would be M2Ks and Migs sitted in their hangars, with no spares, no modern avionics, no nothing.

    your jokes are as good as “los caporales” man (BTW i loved them) you should make a career out of that, any pantera, elkan or F-5 maneouvering harder than 6g. will have its wings doing applauses to its pilot. you know that :rolleyes:

    You’re wrong. It’s far better, and you know that.
    Why to deny it?

    i am to deny it!, the only advantage elta has over the N-019 is its ground modes as the N-019 as it is doesnt have, sorry but you dont need ground mode for an air to air kill, so you can keep it. ๐Ÿ˜‰
    and as for a2a…
    35-55 look up or 30-45 look down, its nothing special ๐Ÿ˜ฎ
    next…BVR Derby, did you ever wonder why IAF/DF doesnt have them??? ๐Ÿ˜ฎ they’re still buying amraams, did you know???
    because its good for “third world countries with small air forces” ๐Ÿ˜ฎ
    did you know that it doesnt have datalink either? so you cant fire farther than 60kms, want some more??? go here.
    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=28353
    were we all learn about.

    Bad for you kid. Facts are facts.
    You can’t compare the electronics/avionic mounted on a chilean F-5E Tigre III Plus with the old useless toys on your rusted, leaking Migs.
    A state of the art DASH system mounted in F-5s “slightly better” than nothing in your Mig-29?
    Good joke.

    what can “the best optronics in the universe” do on such an oudated and restricted and pig kind’a maneouvering f-5 airframe? :confused:

    I really like this guy.
    An F-5 with worst visibility than a Mig-21?? Don’t make me laugh ol’ pal…
    We’re in the missile age, remember?
    Your peruvian pilot will be in hell even just before sighting an F-5 (and very soon the Chilean F-16s..) with two Python 4 in his ass.

    talking about DREAMING ๐Ÿ˜€
    and as for the rest of your comments… yes very funny, i always knew chileans had the best jokes ๐Ÿ˜€ ๐Ÿ˜€ ๐Ÿ˜€ (los caporales again)

    Now go to sleep!!!.
    You’re wetting your bed again!

    yeah babe, looking at FAP’s fighters… ITS ORGASMIC ๐Ÿ˜Ž ๐Ÿ˜‰ ๐Ÿ™‚
    you got “that” right.
    Camaro

    in reply to: Peruvian Mig-29 info #2665122
    Camaro
    Participant

    Camaro, good to know that Peruvian AF are increasing its capabilities. So….iยดm looking forward to see Mig-29s and/or Mirage 2000s here in Brazil for Cruzex ๐Ÿ™‚ ๐Ÿ™‚ :cool:[/QUOTE]

    me too brother, BTW, do you have any news about the new fighter for our Brazilian brothers?
    i’m still hoping for the Su-35. ๐Ÿ˜Ž ๐Ÿ˜Ž ๐Ÿ˜Ž

    hey SOC, its been a loooooong time ๐Ÿ™‚ nice to have you back bro. ๐Ÿ˜‰
    Camaro.

    in reply to: Peruvian Mig-29 info #2665311
    Camaro
    Participant

    ok lets see… ๐Ÿ™‚ (you too condorito :p )
    fach has 1 condor, FAB has 5 erieyes, so fach is no better than FAB in that matter.
    2- Mirage elkan’s and pantera’s are just sitting ducks against M2k or Mig-29, agreed?
    3- the F-5…hhhmmm, lets see,
    its ELTA is not better, at most similar performance to the N-019xx
    its baby BVR derby? when within firing range it will have a R-77 already blowing its nose, so…too late.
    4- its optronics?, slightly better than the Migs (good for you son ๐Ÿ˜‰ ) but where?
    an airframe (F-5) that has cockpit visibility as bad as that of the Mig-21? adding the 6g. maneoubrability limit…you dont have to be “Ungenio” to gess who’s (the Mig-29) going to be wipping your a$$ much before your F-5 gets in position to fire its python-4
    5- ergonomics? well i dont care very much for leather seats and a 2000watt sound system with CD player ๐Ÿ˜€
    so here FACH is no better than FAP (as it is) either.

    about FAP’s Canberras and M5P’s…they are history.
    serviceability? all M2k’s are operational, at least 11 Mig-29’s, most of the Su-25’s and a few Su-22’s.
    budget?, the government just announced “officially” that the armed forces have been granted an increase and they’re authorized to spend the rest of the annual budget NOW and will receive some more, this made news last week.
    so more airplanes just make more targets for the Migs and M2k’s. ๐Ÿ˜Ž
    Camaro.

    in reply to: Peruvian Mig-29 info #2665987
    Camaro
    Participant

    thanks for the info compadre sapito.
    i’m itching to know how it was between the F-18’s and the M2k’s and even more to know if the Migs did some against also (i hope with all my heart) ๐Ÿ˜‰ man! that’s gat to be HOT.
    please, keep us up to date, thanks a million ๐Ÿ™‚
    Camaro.

    in reply to: R-27AE development #2060842
    Camaro
    Participant

    what i understood from “war of attrition” AFM, was russian mercenaries on Su-27 etiopia and ukranian mercenaries Mig-29 eritrea, both firing R-27’s and the few kills given to the russian mercenaries and these guys having the better R-27’s via their…”friends in high russian places”
    it doesnt surprise me at all. :rolleyes:
    but how about the new seeker developed? (well, 1999 :rolleyes: ), it seems to transform it into something real hot. see link

    http://www.aeronautics.ru/nws001/fi014.htm

    i’d like your opinion guys. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Camaro.

    in reply to: what about DERBY? #2060845
    Camaro
    Participant

    but it means that your radar isnt slaved to the target giving u the freedom to attack other targets

    BINGO!!!, thanks man, now i see a better picture, of course, you have not only 1 BVR and there are plenty of targets to have fun with, so you have to stay a little bit on course, that’s why.
    thanks to you too flex, yes i agree on the baby BVR, equally dangerous BTW ๐Ÿ˜‰
    Camaro.

    in reply to: Now…lets compare the R-73 against the Python-4 #2060860
    Camaro
    Participant

    aerospacetech, thank you for the info on the K-30 ๐Ÿ˜Ž good to know “there actually is” somebody working hard on the subject.
    altough it doesnt mention its OBS capability, i can easily assume that 90 degrees its the new standard, and it seems also that it will again take the lead for some good time. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    harry (bang bang, feuer frei ๐Ÿ˜Ž )
    thanks to you also for the clarification, i assume that those 15 degrees diff. between coupled or not to the HMS are taken directly by the helmet itself…
    lets see, something like, the missile seeker limited mechanically to 45 but the helmet givin 15 more (literally like a second pair of eyes)
    picture this theatre piece: ๐Ÿ˜€
    lord helmet…there he is 60 degrees to the left
    R-73…where?
    lord helmet…more to the left, do you see it?
    then at 45 degrees, R-73…ok i got the sucker
    lord helmet…go get him tiger!!!
    …could it be?
    and then again if the Python-4 has the same limits, then they seem to be pretty much matched, could it be?
    Camaro.

    in reply to: Now…lets compare the R-73 against the Python-4 #2060879
    Camaro
    Participant

    so it doesnt sound like vympel (or anybody in russia) is doing anything (or they are taking way too long) to match the newer generation Pythons and sidewinders ๐Ÿ˜ฎ
    it wouldnt make much sense to get newer and hotter Migs or Sukhois if they dont come with something hotter in the A2A bisness ( ๐Ÿ™‚ ) to match your opponent, isnt it? unless you decide to use Pythons or sidewinders, wich will make your fighter much more expensive, plus maintenance and/or supply wise a bit troublesome ๐Ÿ™ . :confused:
    Camaro.

    in reply to: Peruvian Mig-29 info #2669339
    Camaro
    Participant

    gracias sapito

    hey nice pics sapito, thanks for sharing (i’ve saved the pics ๐Ÿ˜Ž ๐Ÿ˜‰ )
    tell me, the Mig on the pic 037, i believe is on of the bielorussian aircraft? if it is…it doesnt seem too crappy to me (as some idiotic ignorant journalists/politicians claim in Peru, aint it?) i wish i could fly it myself. ๐Ÿ˜Ž

    now tell me, did our guys fly combat practice against the us. navy F-18’s? please, let us know. ๐Ÿ™‚
    Camaro.

    in reply to: what about DERBY? #2060928
    Camaro
    Participant

    allright crobato. ๐Ÿ˜Ž
    now, i wander…when we talk “fire and forget”, it doesnt nessesarily means free to “turn around and walk away” (it remains me of a song from “the babys” ๐Ÿ˜€ ) aint it?
    otherwise, who’s giving the datalink update?, so you still have to illuminate the oponent with your own radar, is that true? :confused:
    Camaro.

    in reply to: Now…lets compare the R-73 against the Python-4 #2060930
    Camaro
    Participant

    i remember reading somwhere about the R-73M1 having a 90 degres OBS, but the source, i’m not sure is that reliable, and who knows if is in production ???
    nobody i believe. :confused:
    dear aerospacetech, i’ve spent the last few hours trying to find info on the K-30 but…no luck, do you have any links about? ๐Ÿ˜‰
    thanks to all brothers. ๐Ÿ™‚
    Camaro.

    in reply to: what about DERBY? #2060999
    Camaro
    Participant

    yes crobato, but just to make it clear, y think you are mixing INS nav update with the enemy position update?
    sure, INS requires every so often a position update, better if you have GPS NAV, but i’m talking navigation, if i’m not mistaken Amraam or R-77 are updated with enemy aircraft position, cause you know they’ll feel the missile coming from far away and they’ll move evasive, i think that’s the datalink info if i’m not mistaken.
    please correct me if i’m wrong.
    another, MICA seem to go much farther than that, i’ve heard from a friend that its about the same as amraam or R-77, again i could be wrong. ๐Ÿ™‚
    Camaro.

    in reply to: what about DERBY? #2061012
    Camaro
    Participant

    shalom again erez ๐Ÿ™‚
    thanks for the info, and the videos (i’ve saved them both, Derby and Python-4) now i can see a much better picture.
    thnaks again brother.
    Camaro.

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 461 total)