Would love to but I dont have a Blu-Ray player yet, although that did’nt stop me getting DVD’s :D, I may just do it if there is another film in the offer that I would like.
I’ll keep you posted.
Ahh, what a beauty.
Don’t you just love the sheer power of the Mk XIV Spitfire (or should that be the FR XIV, no not starting another argument). Even without an engine it looks agressive:)
Cheers
Cees
Agree most definately, Griffons for ever !!!:) To me the fuselage looks more balanced with the longer nose, & why have a three or four bladed prop when you can have five. :diablo:
This is a really great idea, I have always found intact underwater aircraft wrecks to have an ethereal beauty and silent dignity about them.
The american artist Randal Scott has produced several paintings of warbirds on this theme, some examples can be seen here amongst his wildlife work.
http://www.freespiritart.com/art-prints-by-Randall-Scott-143.php
I have often wished that someone would produce a book filled with photos of underwater warbirds as there are a lot out there and not everyone has the oppotunity to dive them in person.
Robbo,
I have no idea if the cleaners lights were on or not! In the interests of presenting a fair case, attached is an image of the Me110 with as little ambient lighting as I could muster.
Still loooks OK to me.
My visit was purely for enjoyment not photography so I did’nt take my camera therefore my opinion on the lighting was from the “viewing” point of view and I can catagorically state that the lighting (even ambient) was nothing like that seen in your pictures, this was in fact how I remember the place from my first visit not long after the hall was opened. Now whilst not quite as bad as NASHIO966’s images it wasnt far off. In fact in my conversation with the warden about the lighting he jokingly commented that it gave the place a “blitz / blackout” feel. He further stated that the company that installed the “theatre show” got their calculations wrong on the amount of light required hence his comment that its was going to be corrected later in the year.
Well, I certainly seem to have struck a chord with my comments.
When first taken as a youngster it was the airframes that grabbed my attention whilst my parents were more interested in the side galleries with their personal histories so the museum was working on two levels thus appealing to a broad audience, closing these galleries may save money but diminishes the attraction as well as ignoring its reason for existance as the job of any museum is primarily one of education.
I saw an example of this on my visit, a group of what looked like 5 year old’s were sitting around the Bristol F2b (clad in their high vis waistcoats) being lectured on aircraft design by what I asssumed was a museum employee. The poor chap was fighting a losing battle to keep their attention as his talk was going way over their heads as he was being way too technical explaining how a helicopters rotors work to generate lift.
What surprised me was the large areas given over to non museum activities, apart from the previously mentioned cafe’ there was a large play area for the younger children to amuse themselves in, this seemed to be the most popular part of the building judging by the numbers of kids using it. I’m not against this sort facility but it just seemed to be overly large and out of place in its current location.
In fact the only people who were interested in the actual exhibits apart from myself were at the retirement end of the age range everyone else was either playing in the play area or in the case of a few teenagers texting on their mobiles. This dosen’t seem to be the case at Duxford where all ages seem genuinely interested in the exhibits.
None of this is necessarily the museums fault but it all contributes to the general atmosphere of the place.
Duxford has play areas and cafe’s but these are kept seperate from the main displays, Hendon has room to do this by using a small part of the car park which was at least 80% empty on my visit.
It really saddens me that one of the great aircraft collections of the world is now a shadow of its former self.
As previous posters have said, I would still recomend anyone to visit who has not yet done so as there are some unique exhibits to be seen I just wish that it was displayed with a bit more care and class the way it used to be.
Thanks for the info, you could be right about them being Yak 11’s, i’m not too up on my Russian aircraft.
Bummer !,bang goes my dream of seeing a Beau & Blenheim in formation. 😡
Still, if it’s going to Aus then it opens up the possibility of a Beaufighter & Beaufort formation even if I have to enjoy it by proxy. 🙂
I might be wrong but I dont think they have had any offers on the Beau yet, unless I missed something.
This re-make was briefly mentioned on last weeks “Film 2009”, nothing new other than to imply that it is still one of Mr Jackson’s projects.
I’ll never forget Steve Hinton’s unique taxy & park style in this aircraft at Legends ’07, I think that because of the unusual cockpit entry on this airframe he thought he was parking the family car !
Thanks for all the info guys. for some reason I did’nt think of the exploding & crashing Spitfires.
Some pictures here Paul…
http://www.airwarweb.net/recpix.php
Interesting site, the list of recovered aircraft is mouth watering even if they were’nt all intact airframes. Its a shame that the “Operation Harvest” film is mired in copyright issues as I’m sure that there would be a ready market for a DVD of this footage starting with me.
lovely looking aircraft, and (IMHO) shows why (IMHO) Griffon engined Spitfires have low backs, and Merlin high backs, it just seems right that way.
I’m with you there, the longer nose & tear drop canopy make the airframe look more “balanced” (IMHO) the Griffon models are my personal favourites.
Real shame that a machine that was built to protect these shores needed to go to the US to allow its return to its natural enviroment.:mad:
What this airframe needs is someone with the vision & drive of someone like Stephen Grey who can appreciate it for what it is, a historical artifact that needs to be preserved in its true element and not just looked at as a drain on the bank balance or stored until a killing can be made once people realise its true worth.
Easy for me to say I know, but at the end of the day isnt it about preservation for future generations rather than “Spitfire snobbery”.
I seem to recall a few years ago (I think it was the old Hunter One collection) abandoned a plan to restore to flight a Hawker Sea Hawk because it wasnt economic, but surely thats not the point, if you love the machine you do whatever it takes regardless of cost. Paul Allens collection is a perfect example of this policy.
I believe that the pilots name was Paul Klipsch & his aircraft crashed in Northern France in 1940,,
Its been a while since I saw this but I remember it being quite good, it will give me a chance to record it to DVD to replace my ropey VHS copy.