dark light

Stuart H

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 324 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Mr Rusty update(old thread 2007) #1149915
    Stuart H
    Participant

    Or hacked off the control column…

    in reply to: Mr Rusty update(old thread 2007) #1150021
    Stuart H
    Participant

    I was lucky enough to fly in a Shackleton in the 70’s.

    The preflight brief included, ‘We have a couple of leaky tanks so if you see or smell fuel, let us know’ and ‘We have a flat spot on the tyres as the aircraft has been sitting for a while. Don’t worry about the vibration’.

    Myself and the other cadet who was with me must have p****d of the pilot though, both of us walking back and forth, end to end of the aeroplane. The pilot seemed to always be busy with a big wheel at his side whenever we passed….:o

    in reply to: T.21 Restoration #1111373
    Stuart H
    Participant

    Heartening to know someone is still caring for these old gliders!
    I was involved in an unusual incident with the Highland Gliding Club at Milltown airfield, Moray, around 1970/1971, when I was roughly 14 or 15.
    Surface winds were too strong to fly this particular day, so our T-21 was parked with the low wing pointed into the wind direction. I’d taken the opportunity to have a nap in the cockpit, and was startled awake by some instructors and pilots shouting “Push the nose down!” at me. Turned out the glider was rolling backward, with it’s nose in the air, with me fast asleep inside!
    I remember pushing the stick forward, and hitting the ground with quite a thud…

    Yes, I remember that too. An unconventional first solo.

    My first solo was in the T21, 1973. Before going solo my first experience of soaring was in the T21 open cockpit, sharing a thermal with a Ka 7 nearby.

    in reply to: The Beautiful Buccaneer #1124483
    Stuart H
    Participant

    There was talk of a 1/32 scale model, but nothing seems to have come of it so far. See http://www.britmodeller.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=41895&hl=trumpeter+bucc and for some pics http://www.britmodeller.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=41892&st=0#entry443656

    I’d have probably bought several to paint in various Navy schemes….

    in reply to: Shoreham Airshow Glider Incident #533948
    Stuart H
    Participant

    I doubt if rotor off the trees was one the primary causes of this accident !
    I have refrained from comment so far but only because from the video clip -(1) I cannot see if the runway(s) were obstructed.
    I also cannot see if he had (2) a flying control or (3) airbrake control problem.
    If none of those 3 problems existed then one might conclude that pulling off tow at low level would leave very few options,there was a fairly strong wind blowing so an immediate 360 degree turn to land into wind might be favourite.
    The pilot flew downwind with airbrakes open (attemped downwind landing ?or attempted return to threshold?).
    He had insufficient height for the final 180 deg turn to land (and the airbrakes were still open !)
    Not really conjecture – it is all on the video …but a/c accidents are sometimes a combination of circumstances which is why I started my post with 3 possible mitigating scenarios.

    rgds baz

    I agree with your comments about a combination of factors. I still suspect rotor and an over-ruddered flat turn due to an aborted downwind landing attempt led to him spinning in.

    I’ve also experienced rotor from trees in a glider. After a lowish and well banked final turn, the glider was very reluctant to come out of the turn and only a bootful of opposite rudder brought it level again. Luck was with me that day however, and the only outcome was some well chosen words of advice from the CFI. I could just as easily have spun in too.

    in reply to: Shoreham Airshow Glider Incident #537317
    Stuart H
    Participant

    An amazing capture..the pilot has guardian angel

    Possibly, but if so his guardian angel, quite literally, gave him one hell of a boot up the backside.

    in reply to: Shoreham Airshow Glider Incident #537715
    Stuart H
    Participant

    I thought we were all in agreement about waiting for the AAIB to publish their findings, it would appear I’m mistaken.

    I’m afraid you are mistaken. Only two posters suggested waiting for the AAIB report. I agree with Ozplane in this particular instance. Discussing it isn’t predjudicing the investigation, nor is it speaking ill of the dead.

    As Ozplane said, it would be interesting to see the met for the day. The treetops appear to be swaying in the take off video. The Pawnee smoke is drifting crosswind towards the crowd. Perhaps there was some curlover from the trees?

    in reply to: Shoreham Airshow Glider Incident #537833
    Stuart H
    Participant

    As a glider pilot with almost 3000 hours gliding I have watched the U-Tube clip many times and studied the still photos with great interest.

    The glider appears to depart from controlled flight during the final turn and spin in. The first photo clearly shows full up elevator which would be unusual at this stage of flt other than in blind panic (instinc due to the ground rushing up).

    The fact that the tow rope went slack during the tow has no bearing on why the glider departed from controlled flight close to the ground. I suggest that we all wait for the AIB report rather than speculating as a matter of respect for the pilot who has thrilled many thousands of people at previous airshows.

    Sorry, but without waiting for the AIB report, from the video I noticed that the airbrakes were pulled on the downwind leg. it looked to me like a flat, over ruddered turn and the inevitable consequence.

    Perhaps he ran out of room trying to land downwind and attempted the turn.

    in reply to: Polishing Aluminium (Merlin) Parts. #1099922
    Stuart H
    Participant

    Kinda lazy myself…

    http://i890.photobucket.com/albums/ac109/Stuart_H/published/th_fag-1.jpg?t=1277769166

    Harley Sportster by the way.

    in reply to: General Discussion #350808
    Stuart H
    Participant

    No apology required, I like a good argument – just ask Grey Area:diablo:

    in reply to: The Budget! #1918376
    Stuart H
    Participant

    No apology required, I like a good argument – just ask Grey Area:diablo:

    in reply to: General Discussion #350966
    Stuart H
    Participant

    I’m not having a laugh when professionaly qualified staff require to be managed so much more in 2009 than they did 15 years ago. In 2005, there was 1 manager per 24 professionaly qualified staff. In 2009, there was 1 manager per 16 professionaly qualified staff.

    In 1995, there were 507358 professionaly qualified staff and 20842 managers, a ratio of 24.3 to 1

    In 2009, there were 725,579 professionaly qualified staff and 44641 managers, a ratio of 16.3 to 1

    That’s my rationale. Or perhaps its an error in my interpretation of the data? Data again from The NHS Information Service.

    in reply to: The Budget! #1918461
    Stuart H
    Participant

    I’m not having a laugh when professionaly qualified staff require to be managed so much more in 2009 than they did 15 years ago. In 2005, there was 1 manager per 24 professionaly qualified staff. In 2009, there was 1 manager per 16 professionaly qualified staff.

    In 1995, there were 507358 professionaly qualified staff and 20842 managers, a ratio of 24.3 to 1

    In 2009, there were 725,579 professionaly qualified staff and 44641 managers, a ratio of 16.3 to 1

    That’s my rationale. Or perhaps its an error in my interpretation of the data? Data again from The NHS Information Service.

    in reply to: General Discussion #351213
    Stuart H
    Participant

    Pedant – I’m never sure which syllable is accented.

    in reply to: The Budget! #1918559
    Stuart H
    Participant

    Pedant – I’m never sure which syllable is accented.

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 324 total)