And sometimes a wreck’s type can be identified by relatively small clues. The Simmonds Mk. III fuel contents guage was used by only a few aircraft, most notably the Stirling.
HP57,
He still has it, as far as I’m aware and I thought I’d heard a rumour that it might be coming up for auction, but I’ve no definite information to offer.
Al
Fabulous, another one back from the dead!
The parts were still on display when I last visited a few years ago.
There was also a throttle box, labelled as Whitley, but actually from an Oxford, iirc.
I meant to point the error out but forgot. Perhaps someone from the museum will read this thread and alter the placard?
If you’d like to send me a private message, I should be able to help.
Regards,
682al
Bloody hell! (Ooops, did I just break a forum rule?)
Glad you’re o.k., but what an extraordinary, and very frightening, experience it must have been. And thank goodness you had your mobile with you.
Had the same thing befallen me, you can bet mine would be in the drawer at home and there could have been a very different outcome.
Don’t be tempted to trade it in when it becomes out-dated, put it in a frame and hang it on your wall!
Best wishes,
Al
Hi Skypilot62,
I would bet that the AH numbers applied to civilian as well as military, but I don’t know for sure.
Re the larger tail wheel, I get the impression it’s from a 1940’s/50’s type. Can I see a treaded tyre, rather than a smooth one?
18 inches suggests something pretty chunky, but not four-engined. Hmmm, wild guess, but how about something like Viking/Valetta?
Regards,
Al
What a beaut find! Thanks for posting the pics.
I love the “look what’s turned up” threads, let’s have more!
Hi HP57,
I’ll kick this one off as the board is pretty quiet today.
I’ve not heard of a Halifax throttle box being available for sale or trade in all the years of my cockpit collecting. I cannot recall the ads in Flypast, either, although I must admit it’s been some years since I last read the mag.
The Cotswold Aircraft Restoration Group had a Halifax restoration project that originated in a Scottish scrapyard. This was something like the port half of a cockpit wall, with attached floor, control column and, I think, a quadrant.
I last saw it about fifteen years ago and I’ve no idea about its current state or whereabouts.
We have some very corroded throttle remnants in our collection – but you know this anyway, as I sent you some photos a while back.
I really cannot offer much more in the way of leads, but maybe this post might spark a memory or two and result in some new info? I know you’ve made this appeal in many forums on the net, so let’s hope your perseverance pays off!
Regards!
682al
p.s. We recently picked up an Air Mileage Unit, dated 1943, from a Halifax in the NP range (still got it’s stores tag attached). Interested in a swap or something?
The aerial is nothing like the type used on the Anson XIX and the earlier Marks had one which tapered to a point, which yours doesn’t.
The tyre size (4.95 – 3 1/2) of the tail wheel was common to quite a few types, Anson, Swordfish, Fulmar etc. Are there any “AH…” ref. numbers from the wheel itself?
The 11.25 – 12 tyre size is correct for a Barracuda or Firefly. Again, without an “AH…”ref. from the wheel itself, it’s hard to say which one.
Is that some damage on the fuselage of the plane in the code letter beside the serial number? Looks like a small hole.
Ross, the damage seems to look like a foot step or something like that, it’s not damage and I have never noticed this before.
Back to the Lancaster photo for a moment.
Many Lancs had a second static vent installed in about this position, particularly when fitted with the Mk. XIV bombsight. It usually shows up on photos as a bright spot, approx. 6″ x 2.5″.
I’m tempted to say that the small object is the flag on the end of a plug which would have been fitted on the ground to prevent dirt getting in (the “remove before flight” type).
However, some of the photoshopped images have me doubting this. They appear to show something protruding from the fuselage, with a shield over it.
I can’t see anything like it in other Lanc photos and it’s got me intrigued.
I’m taking a quick break from renewing the Waxoyl treatment on the underside of my ancient camper van…anyone who’s ever done this job will understand why I suddenly have an irresistable desire to look at Lanc photos!
Nope….
Sorry, but I’m sticking with ND627. When you take the reasonably reliable characters into account (?D?27), and then compare them with Lancaster serial ranges, and individual aircraft histories, there really aren’t any other viable options.
Harry Holmes lists ND627 as with 12 Sqn. in Feb. ’44, so there’s another corroborating piece of info.
And Peter had already come to this conclusion, too, which I hadn’t spotted when I sent my first reply!
Might it be ND627, which was “PH-U” of 12 Sqn.?
12 Sqn. was at Wickenby in February 1944 and the code letter after the roundel might well be “U”.
If it is ND627, it went missing on a raid to Orleans, the night of 4th/5th July, 1944….almost exactly sixty years ago to the day!
(My only caveat is that ND627 would have been almost new and may not have reached 12 Sqn. by February.)
Perhaps someone with access to the 12 Sqn. ORB may be able to help. What about the Wickenby Register?
From the DE HAVILLAND GAZETTE, April, 1946, published by de Havilland Enterprise….
Someone with more copies of the Gazette than I, might care to waste a few hours checking to see if this spelling was consistent throughout, or maybe it was just down to the individual writer’s preference?