In your opinion this would be a 4- or 2 engined aircraft?
Regards,
Hammer
CFTE info from Scramble.nl
Chinese Flight Test Evaluation Unit
At CFTE all major tests in the Xi’an area are concentrated, resulting in an impressive number of aircraft types to be used. The four photo’s below that were apparently taken in 2002 give a good example of this.
CFTE is based at Yanliang airport near Xi’an.
http://www.scramble.nl/cn.htm Click on “More info” on the left menu bar to see pictures…
Regards,
Hammer
I’m real sad the western engined versions never materialised, not even in prototype form. CFM-56, RB211 and PW 2000 were considered in the late 90’s to a requirement by an undisclosed British air cargo operator…
http://www.sfu.ca/casr/bg-airlift-il76.htm
Comments?
Have we reached a point in time where such a model would be interesting to new western military and civilian clients?
Hammer
and who is the last customer?
Surely not “last” but the latest should be…
Jordan Air Force bought a couple Il-76MF in MAKS 05
http://www.mosnews.com/money/2005/08/17/jordanaircraft.shtml
Later on China put on a large order for 38 aircraft in sep 05.
http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/il76/
Regards,
Hammer
Its amazing how the times change…
In the 50ยดs, 60ยดs, 70ยดs and 80ยดs anyone would automatically assume the US would immediately transfer some 15-20 Chinooks to the British Army in any similar situation…
Costs would be settled if ever many years in future… Now the British have to rent Russian made helos…
Comments?
Hammer
To me this is actualy the dream situation for the Russian helicopter industry…
Who knows, maybe they use the Mi-26s like them and buy them in numbers as the next British heavy helo… The shorter the available budget the more interesting the Russian helos might seem to the western military forces.
Comments?
Regards?
Hammer
Hey Cessna! ๐ I’m glad you enjoyed this article, we thought this subject was pretty poorly described in the local mags, so we ran it! ๐ Thanks for the update on the Pumas, are they back on the original cammo scheme already?
Regards,
Hammer
What exaactly defines a Vertical Launching System? How can we compare them outside the max length of the missile and the raw size of the egg-crate silos? Does it have any intelligence buit into it besides opening the top doors at the right time? Is there a limit to the number of firings a single silo can withstand during its operational lifetime? If it’s nothing but simple steel structure why not buy it from the shipbuilder instead of Lockheed? Is there some kind of preffered loading/firing sequence in order to maintain the ship’s balance? Should heavier missiles be poositioned in the center silo rows?
In my understanding one of the most intriguing aspects of the VLS is it’s ability to fool the enemy’s inteligence gathering apparatus. A ship might carry 100% anti-air mississiles or 100% Tomahawk/SCALP surface to surface or even 100% Anti ship missiles as well as each and every possible combinations of these three weapons, The enemy only will be sure after the full missile complement is fired, or in a another way: “too late”.
How far are the Russian progressing on this area of VLS missiles?
As you can see I have no idea on how this thing works, thanks for the enlightenment. ๐
Regards
Hammer
If Pinko is correct in his assessment then no more Su-30 or Gripen for the Thai Air Force… Only F-16s…. Or maybe F-15s if the can find the “poultry cash” for it…
What do you think?
Regards,
Hammer
So now we should expect a complete breakdown in political, economic and military links with the coup imposed government in Bangkok since the the US and Europe both abhor non-democratic governments, right?
…
Yeah, i suppose so! ๐
Regards
You can have a Navy fighter go to the Air Force but you can’t go other way around. The costs of stregthening the frame and preparing it for landing on a carrier would be very, very high.
That is unless you are a russian designer… MiG-29K, Su33, Su-25K… ๐ Before you answer me… I know they aren’t catapult launchable… ๐
Regards,
Hammer
Interest is certain, funds availability are another totally different issue… ๐ I’d place my bets on second hand AAV units procured from US Marine stocks as they are replaced by newer models…
Regards,
Hammer
god bless google Earth!
All true, too bad the country’s size and particular shape makes it practicaly undefendable… They’d need scores of F-15 or Su-30s and/or some well equipped CVs to atempt to overcome this serious geographical vulnerability issue… ๐
Regards,
Hammer
Russians most likely value their relationship with america a lot more then what profits a 50 jet deal ( again speculation as not even a shred of evidence is available to support such a claim) , Russia and america are increasing Bi-lateral trade and are friends unlike back in the day . It is in the interest of both parties to increase this friendship further .
Since when does any hegemonic unilateralistic Titan have “friends”? ๐ If you’re correct, then why did the Venezuelan Flanker sale go through despite the US formal, vehement and public oposition to it?
I think the energy/oil equation today is much heavier/stronger on the producer’s side then at the consumer’s side, this is a good enough reason for Russia to not have to do exactly what the US wants.
In my understanding the Iranian Flanker deal is much more important to the continuing existence and survival of the Russian Eletronics/Aerospace/Defence sector than the just gross value of the deal might sugest.
A larger (and growing!) client base will give the Russian Aerospace industry time needed for it to get it’s act together in order to be a perfectly competitive player in the world market some 10 years down the road.
A military commercial success now would allow it to be able to have the organization and technologies in place to make a serious bid at the world civilian aircraft market, a large segment that was wiped clean with the end of the URSS.
This is just my point of view. ๐
Comments?
Regards,
Hammer