I flew from wolverhampton 4 1/2 yrs ago during my flying scholarship, and di my solo on the ‘downhill’ runway, interesting to say the least!
I used to be a staff cadet at cosford on bulldogs with a guy who was working his way up in the control tower, I forget what his job title was, ATCO or somthing like that.
To be honest nothing there ever really bothered me about the place, but then I was just interested in the flying and as long as I could do that I was happy!
coanda
hmm as i understand it, the british aircrew NVG’s are powered by lithium cells these days, and the battery pack is formed to roughly the shape of the back of the helmet. the battery pack affixes to the helmet to balance the weight of the bheavy optics fitted over the front of the helmet.
given the clunkiness of the design (beaded chain securing battery cap! ) I might be tempted to say that they are first gen american aircrew NVG’s. I am no historian mind and pictures of aircrew with NVG’s dont exaclty spring to mind, of anything of any age.
another possible clue as to ownership might go to the rubber eyepieces which seem to be shaped to fit onto a spherically shaped clear visor ala fast jet aircrew.
but then again….fast jet aircrew dont want their C-Cells running out on them mid-flight…..and again given the robust design it is also possible that they are for infantry or tank use.
just educated guesses
coanda
thanx ja and sev.
whose sub is in the second pic, that with A900
is it a brit boat?? interested in the fairing on the rear of the sail.
any ideas?? towed array??
no competiton, tsr2 would wipe the floor in the strike arena, against ANYTHING
You get what you pay for srbin. lets just put it that way.
last time I saw it would be the last airshow of uk based f-111’s which i think was at mildenhall…..
I can find you a B2 on a global power mission…given a low enough freq radar.
they didnt last 2 months.
ahh active cancellation is being looked at by a couple of countries, but theres no real point, its too difficult and if you do get it wrong you look like a light house…..just too many variables to get right all at once…….
now what can we do with LADAR’s that we cant do with RADAR’s??
fuel additives control contrail formation I understand.
oh…..and dont fly in contrail forming layers….
I’ve been meaning to put up my dissertation/thesis from university for a while now but at over 60 pages its not an easy thing to do, and the last thing i want is to have it plagiarised……….
The title is long winded but the laymans version of it is:
“how to make a stealth aircraft in Microsoft Excel.”
the thing with ‘stealth’ is radar cross section, or the ‘size’ of the airplane as seen by the radar, and the type of radar plays a major part in stealth-which in reality is a fluid system that is neither optimal or inefficient.
the smaller projected surface area you present geometrically, the smaller surface area you will also have to radar flying wings provide that small surface area.
obviously theres more to it than that but its a start…….and anyway….anyone who did optics at school can make the f117…..that physics is quite literally childs play.
well get to it asap mixtec……
less seams and panel gaps = speed
aswell as arthurs extensive reply
😉
k, I am willing to go with this mixtec…..make them work I want to see the aircraft hit its performance parameters, when you can prove to me that it can be done then come on back and I will select a large hat to devour.
coanda
as regards the supposed IFR probes.
I believe that they are buffers against damage from the moveable work platforms that you can see near the aircraft.
coanda