i can see squared off edges for rounded surfaces, for example the landing gear door.

mixtec, you simply cant compare and contrast the two.

flood, crackin photos and drawings…..thanx very much, I wonder, yo see the sturgeon just above the drawings could anyone shine a light on what type of engines they are and if they are a simple swap of the engines in the drawing immediately below it…

I like the aeroplane in that pick with hte ASV(?) nose and am planning to make it in a flight sim……so any help on specs (which I seem to draw short on) would be great!

in deep search for a decent 3-view or even better any kind of plans to do with the shorts sturgeon!

doesnt look that great to me mixtec…why they cant even get the mirrored image on the stbd side of the tail corrected before release??

LOMAC is better visually than this, and whilst the physics engine takes time, the ‘simple’ task of animating parts properly (lets see you animate the gear on the F16) is not to be scoffed at.

coanda

I have both the fighter and bomber project books, they are indeed very interesting.

v-stab looks awfully small, otherwise, interesting yet effective looking….

this aircraft would have ruled airspace and piddled all over strike eagles…….If there is one aircraft that i would like to see in flight…even if it meant giving up aviation as the forfeit…it would be the TSR2….I’d be happy basket-making then.

gdl, no one was telling the thousands of people to move on…they stopped that malarky years ago…I remember the humour of watching three usaf security troops trying to stop approximately 5000 people at a time taking photo’s of a U-2……couldnt see em for dust!