hi daz,
paul (armageddon) wants them for a research topic here at uni…roughly how closely aircraft built from paper plans (such as the spit)match the plans they were built from…..I suspect not that well in terms of the mass production of aircraft like the spitfire
ps..what was the (rough) build ratios for spits versus hurri’s? i understand that you could build more hurri’s in the construction time of one spit? not sure tho, so asking the experts!
no pics?
glad the crew are ok.
it is a good sim, its just a shame that all those moving vehicles kill the smoothness of the sim…an issue il2 approached and was beaten back by RAM quantity……I now have a 1gb ram a 128mb ti4200 gf4 and the second a10 campaign mission is completely pants….it might be because of the weather…weather seems to have a great effect….its a shame you cant change it for the campaigns….
coanda
its a very useful aircraft for displaying certain aircraft qualities for the purposes of aircraft famil for the test pilots school.
it must still be in service and looking pretty happy about it!!
coanda
the sacrifices you have to make ken!!
would love to go to that show!
‘not very complimentary’
i’m interested to know in what way….pm if you’d prefer.
thanx
coanda
there are no problems these days with the foxhunter radar, it is still a fairly potent and useful set of equipment.
because the terms of sale meant that they had to be destroyed at the end of their days
the torque links on that tornado undercarriage are back to front……pretty obvious to anyone who knows anything about tornadoes, how can they SELL it when this (and it appears all the versions) are wrong soo fundamentally.
coanda
perhaps i have missed this but is there any chance of your appraisals of the current types of aircraft that might be flying in the blackworld……..
the dark star disappeared very quickly didnt it?
and there was an awful lot of money wasted on the X33 dont you think?
just two things for consideration…….
at least we are not posting pictures of the dispicable ethnic cleansing carried out.
without wreckage, and lets be honest there would be some kind whether actual, political, emotional or otherwise you cannot prove that any of the spurious events you describe actually happenned thus your version of events has soo far only proved to be fictious,
stand down, you have done a good job of ruining any credibility you might have had.
i believe your stories to be ficticious if for no other reason than because the ‘captured’ crews were not put on television by anybody, somthing that would certainly have happenned as a morale booster.
cool pics arthur, is that a vautour i c back there?
no,
the politics involved in the thread has no direct link(that can be discussed in terms of aviation) with the RAF, AAC or the FAA.
all the initial post says that the government has made our armed forces smaller and what do you think the uk armed forces can still do about it.
there does not seem to be an abundance of tv guided weapons around, weapon for weapon they must be pretty low….in the book
NATO Air-Launched Weapons by Jeremy Flack
there are 10 TV guided air to surface weapons listed, and out of a total of 108 munitions thats about 9% I am aware of the fact that other tv guided weapons may/have existed but this is just on terms of this source alone.
so perhaps they have never been very popular….why?
-they may require a higher workload in the cockpit for the crew
-they are quite likley to be more expensive to use(unit cost) and build
-perhaps they are not as reliable as other types of seeker equipped munitions?
-you cant hand them off to be targetted from other sources such as FAC (or at least not that i know of).
the actual seekers themselves allow the weapon to be pointed at a specific target thats all really, theres not much point in having them gimballed because a great amount, because the further you pan the camera the harder it is to makethe missile get to that target.
todays on board seekers can lock onto a point as designated by the crewperson in such a way that it can give you the geographical coordinates of the point it is locked onto if the seeker is connected (or at least fed) the nav data from the aircraft.
if you are in control of the missile you can track the missile to the point of impact. this may make TV guided weapons more useful than you think, as an IR/radar seeker may, for example loose a lock on a vehicle if it goes under a bridge whereas the operator can steer a tv guided munition towards where the target may emerge…getting the best from the weapon.