Steve,
Balanced and imbalanced forces are different things. The aircraft was made to be put on three wheels at the ground angle. By placing the fuselage in that way extra force is being centred on the top rear of the fuselage(it stays balanced but by a different means).
In flight again, forces are balanced and the strength is in place to deal with the forces of lift and to a greater extent, turbulence and air movement. Yes both lifting surfaces do create lift, the whole point of the tail surface is to resist the pitching moment of the main plane. so tail lift(as a moment) is often inversely proportional to main plane lift. Besides providing a lateral stabilising factor the rear fuselage need ideally only deal with the maximum possible turning force created by the tailplane multiplied by a safety factor. And that force is often an instantaneous one, decreasing with aircraft movement.
I hope that goes some way to explain why its just not a good idea to do this……
coanda
if there is a huge problem with fluids, drain em, they were made to be drained…..putting the aircraft like this provides a very effective way of applying pressure along the top rear of the aircraft….not somthing i would like to be doing.
coanda
I also stood wet and cold today!
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?threadid=18156
here are some of my photo’s, indeed the spit display was very good to see! perhaps the best looking spit left in my eyes…
coanda
each to their own damien, frankly i wouldnt touch one but then thats my opinion, I believe everyone is allowed one of those these days?
And I think you’d better go and look at some of your box tops, as I was told of a particular aircraft pictured being a hasegawa model, and it is easy to see the main differences(just look at the tailwheels).
Perhaps I am incorrect in stating that you have ‘copied’ models however I am correct in stating that selling a product by advertising a diff product is fairly dodgy.
coanda
I’ve seen them out of the box……
You know why they look markedly different on the box to whats in the box?
because they are quite often plastic models made up so that they can be copied. So paint schemes are often wrong (just look at the He111 in the squiggly mid east paint scheme)and even structural differences are glaringly obvious…….somthing I think they fall foul of with the Trades Description Act.
coanda
research=profit loss. not enough diff to do it I expect….it pleases the masses which at the end of the day is what they are all about.
then again, I’ve NEVER seen a corgi replica I would buy.
coanda
hands up! i have doen so also (but I think its a little better that I did it when I was about 10…….
coanda
I hate to be a geek……and its no criticism against your models because they look great! but, why has the spitfire got TWO drooping ailerons?
😀
coanda
Unfortunately I have none of my aircraft on the net anymore……
coanda
at the very least those from the maintenance manual would be astart, particularly those drawings which might show fuselage cross sections, but anything you have would be greatly appreciated, and of course would be attributed to you!
coanda
does any one have or know where to get scale drawings of percival aircraft…I think they are great and would love to put them into the X-Plane Flight sim for everyone to use!
coanda
thats health and safety exec for ya……
coanda
the gemini was sitting right next to it!
coanda
didnt think you could even get drawings for the mb5 anymore i thought they were shredded out of existence…please prove me wrong!
ahh what a beautiful aircraft, thanx for the photo.
coanda