Be fun to see how many hits from the tanker this drag queen has to do, to do the job.
24 miles with a common JDAM. Pretty good, considering most other JDAM shots from other aircraft have been around 10-13. The regular iron bomb body is very useful. However what adds to this is when they do the above with the BLU-110 forged steel pointy tip cousin to the Mk83 body. That coming down vertically on a lot of things has great potential to break a lot of different types of targets. JSF on their first strike of the night will be late to the party where F-22s are already returning from their strategic first strike. :p
Goes with what I said before. After the large SAMs and enemy aircraft are beaten down the first few nights: I don’t need a stealth aircraft and certainly don’t need to be wasting money on the JSF.
The F-15K. 8 GBU-38 ( 500lb JDAM ) on the CFTs ) and an insane variety of weapons.
What also makes the F-15E series powerful is a world beating combat crew simulator that is eye watering.
This is hard to say this lol but with the gear that is in the AESA version of the F-18F, that would be it for a lot of strike duties. The variety of weapons, but more so the sensor fit is turning out to be very very versatile and powerful in tests. Be great if it was on an airframe that had hardcore performance, but… oh well. S for strike and not “super”. At least it can fly off of a carrier so that adds a bit more combat value to it.
I wish our F-15Es had the sensor fit that the F-18F AESA did. That and the most excellent SNIPER pod and it would be a good deal.
F-16 5x or 6x with the big spine and CFTs. Again with the SNIPER.
Here with the BRU 57 twin rack and quad racks for SDBs, it would work very well.
This will provide excellent quick response fires support for USMC. Looks like a useful design in this pork of pork world.
Why is my picture different from the one above? Which design is it supposed to be?

Be interesting to hear ( with no names given obviously ) what the pilots hope is selected for this big buy.
I can guarantee you that a lion’s share of world airforces either don’t use US weapons or use them to a rather small degree because they are expensive and rather maintenance intensive.
Interesting theory. More like maintenance friendly. As for expense, more times than not, after all of the corporate welfare giveaways with offsets, and other creative financing, the only one it is “expensive” for, is the U.S. tax payer.
Well at least they got out OK.
If I want to go to the beach over there, how deep should I dig my trench, so I have something to dive into when IDF arty upsets my beach party?
Looks like you are all having lots of fun. 🙂
Great stuff.
I did my homework tonight and read a 23-pages long history of Hamas downloaded from Euromonitor webpage. I was actually VERY surprised to find out that HAMAS is basically an own child of Israel.
HAMAS raised from non-militant Islamic organization called al-Ikhwan al-Muslimin under control and financing of Israeli government in the times prior to first Intifada and was actually meant as counterbalance to Arafat’s PLO which should furthermore weaken Arafat’s position.. But Israelis have miscalculated the whole matter – after Lebanon 1982 two militant groups within the movement were formed as reaction to Israeli terrorist groups Gush Emunim (operating in West Bank) and Kach! underground group from Gaza. With increasing popularity among simple Palestinian masses the movement slowly slipped out of Israeli control.
HAMAS was created in 1987 as a reaction to so-called ‘truck incident’ performed by Mossad. Al-Qassam groups were formed as late as 1991 after Sheikh al-Yassin was captured and their radicalization was furthermore enhanced after Hebron incident 1994 performed by Gush Emunim (Kach!) and assassinations of two Sheikhs in 1996 and another one in 2004.
What I find furthermore interesting are the numbers of dead during the 2nd Intifada. 973 dead Israelis against 3491 dead Palestinians.
That raises many questions.. Who is actually killing who here? Is the Israeli whining about them being just peaceloving victims of Muslim aggression adequate? Well, let me think… Uhm, no. The miscalculated Israeli attempts to conquer the whole area by political tricks, insurgent terrorist operations and/or direct military involvement added a large contribution to escalation of the whole problem.. So now, let them clean their own mess, gentlemen – but without massive military aid and other luxuries.
Yeah I bet the offer to buy more U.S. made F-15’s makes the situation look even happier after the artillery on the beach stunt Friday.
Unknown. However, get AESA put on to the Typhoon and that might over-time ( as better knowledge of the AESA gear is learned )…. be able to pick out the buick-of-stealth easier. Given the broad scope of the question the JSF should always detect first. But, the JSF has less than 1% of flight testing done so far ( counting the dog and pony show in 2001 as being that seems a joke to me ) we don’t know. Add the B model and you really don’t know. It has only cleared it’s weight concerns in theory, not in flight testing. The “B” might stand for “bingo fuel”. Lets see it fly first.
Wind would be one reason. 😉
I can’t help but think a GPS guided munition would be worthless against a speedboat. You’d have to be using the radar to track the boat and update the munition so frequently that it would become in-effect a radar-guided munition. Against something like an amphibious assault though where the ships would be much less manueverable I could see it packing quite a punch.
The off sensor updating with a special JDAM was already done in tests on moving targets, using JSTARS 2years back. It’s a lot of effort though. The F-18E/F in AESA flavor might be able to pull off that trick. Don’t think ( don’t know really ) if the B-1 radar has a GMTI on it ? Again, it is a lot of effort when you can just use SDBII ( tri sensor from JCM ) or Laser/JDAM …… or even a tri sensor as a strap-on to the JDAM for terminal flight.
So yes you could hit naval targets with the B-1. It just all depends what kind of target it is. If it is some small littoral garbage with no large SAMs, SDBII could plink it dropped from a B-1, many miles away.
The off sensor datalinking to a JDAM sounds OK, however if memory serves from the press release, the truck it hit ( well, got close too ) was going 20-30 miles an hour. We have numerous things that have to have money spent on them. Don’t know how much money needs to be spent on this effort with so many things going on. I understand the perception of need when B-1s stay at Guam or Diego. JSOW with some mods should be able to do it. However it better be one expensive ship. Hate to see the J$OW used to plink some little motor boats. JASSM with mods should be able to do this also. CBU-105 ( BLU-108B SFW ( Sensor Fused Weapon ) )_Wind Corrected Munitions Dispenser would cover 30 acres and kill motor boats too. So there are a lot of ways to skin a cat.
People spend $18,000 on a bass boat, so I guess a JDAM rigged up fancy might be a fair trade. 😉
SDB II with the try sensor would be no problem. SDB I with a mod or a JDAM with the off sensor update during flight might be possible too. ( tests already done by JSTARS ) However that is a lot of effort. I would put money on SDB II or laser/JDAM. SDB penetrates as good as a BLU-109. It is all how you set the fuse. An SDB would mission kill a lot of small craft pretty easy.
The only thing a MiG-29 out of WVR range is… is a very fun AMRAAM target.