dark light

Ross_McNeill

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 826 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Flt Lt Francis Henry Shortt RAF #861567
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    No good looking in AIR 78 unless you are seeking an OR number.

    The London Gazette or Air Force List is the thing for Commissioned Officers

    Oct 1944 AFL gives his personal number as 60145.

    You can use the LG or AFL to trace his Commissioned career from appointment to retirement or last rank in service before death.

    Ross

    in reply to: 206 Sqn Operations Record Book coastal command sortie query #904371
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Very early days of the command it was Search Area but come 1939 abbreviations took over and only S.A.

    The area was defined by co-ordinates and could be changed to different co-ords depending on season or time of day

    The S.A.s are the bounded sea areas on the wall map from HQ Coastal Command shown in the period photo below.

    https://langhamdome.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/CH_013663-e1406300149603.jpg

    S.A.4
    Crossover patrol off North Sea
    53 26N 03 30E
    51 54N 02 28E
    51 50N 03 00E
    53 30N 03 00E

    S.A.5
    Crossover patrol off Western Approaches
    49 15N 05 37W
    47 31N 09 05W
    47 11N 08 32W
    49 36N 06 12W

    A, B, C are the seasonal/time of day variants ordered

    In addition to S.A.s the were also coastwise patrols and these were given names created using the from and to locations

    eg Bert – Bergen to Stavanger, Stand – Stavanger to Kristiansand or your Emro – Emden to Rotterdam

    Ross

    in reply to: Ross McNeill #846071
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Hi Gents,

    Just got back from an offshore wreck survey to the southern approaches – big boat with big boy toys.

    Now catching up with the contact backlog and batch loading the washing machine.

    Cees the Hurricane is slowly progressing – eventual plan is for complete fuselage, centre section and tail. Long term goal is recovery diorama on Queen Mary Semi-Trailer. This is dictated by the weight of the merlin and making the display format accessible to most abilities

    More of an “as and when” project as it depends on a few rare components becoming available.

    What has progressed is the standby project which now whirrs, clicks and wheezes nicely. There is a bundle of organ cloth in the workshop and maple wood for the winter task of motor rebuild.

    Dave it is page 92/93 in the book.

    Ross

    in reply to: Thames Estuary dredging #846449
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    My apologies people,

    Catching up with a backlog I see that I was remiss in not linking to the published details of the Ju 88T recovery when it was released.

    http://www.londongateway.com/media/cms_page_media/122/Archaeology%20from%20the%20Sky%20-%20web4client.pdf

    Ross

    in reply to: Sad RAF Museum #865846
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Let’s go for this – whittle down the collection to 30 odd airframes – move it to Henlow then open a office style showroom in central london complete with a model of each aircraft type the RAF operated.

    That will cover all the needs does it not?

    No need to gain access to a london car park before it’s declared opening time because you think you need special dispensation from the rest of the public and only declare it at the moment you arrive.

    The Henlow location and Central London model shop was the proposal in the 1960s and what you would have had today if the plan had not changed to Hendon (the proposed model collection was created and is in Stafford Store)

    Would this format have provided what we all want/expect/need/wish in a national museum.

    I for one take each collection I visit as a considered whole – grateful for the bits I find interesting and tollerant of the remainder.

    Ross

    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Ahh well if they are published in ‘serious’ publications I’ll switch off my bull**** detector and take them as gospel without question.

    Ross

    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Very strange looking GPR plot.

    If it’s a vertical section the anomaly is down a capped shaft not a tunnel.

    However it is presented (vertical section or horizontal slice) the surrounding ground is shown as completely uniform in structure with no natural inclusions of any type giving rise to reflections.

    If it is GPR false colour plot then it’s been subject to very coarse after processing to filter out geo information.

    These are more akin to GPR equipment displays

    Vertical Section
    http://www.ndt.net/article/wcndt00/papers/idn667/fig3.jpg

    Looks more like a resistivity or magnetic plot to me.

    Good primer info here
    http://asstgroup.com/techniques.html

    Ross

    in reply to: Blackburn B.2 G-ADFV – anyone know where it is now? #869748
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Hi Stuart,

    No way to be 100% certain but the F1180 is correct more times that it is wrong so a good probablity that G-ACBH was Gypsy III powered when it was recorded as Cat W.

    The B.2 in RAF service had a variety of engines (Hermes 4A, Gypsy III, Cirrus Major etc) so model changes during service life look likely.

    This is a quick sample of some F1180 B.2 cards for 1939.

    http://www.rafaircraftaccidents.com/F1180/1939/February_1939/21_2_1939/00800704.JPG

    http://www.rafaircraftaccidents.com/F1180/1939/July_1939/1_7_1939/00800706.JPG

    http://www.rafaircraftaccidents.com/F1180/1939/August_1939/13_8_1939/00800710.JPG

    All F1180 Copyright RAF Museum

    Ross

    in reply to: Blackburn B.2 G-ADFV – anyone know where it is now? #870258
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    G-ACBH/G-ADFO

    G-ACBH was Cat W in this fatal accident

    http://www.rafaircraftaccidents.com/F1180/1940/March_1940/16_3_1940/01101821.JPG

    http://www.rafaircraftaccidents.com/F1180/1940/March_1940/16_3_1940/01101822.JPG

    F1180 Copyright RAF Museum

    Spares recovered later and used with other parts to build composite G-ADFO

    Ross

    in reply to: crash Caister Norfolk 12-10-41 #881608
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Fuel consumption test.

    Court of Inquiry noted that his parents house was approx 4 miles from the crash site and that his girlfriend lived 200 yards away.

    Ross

    in reply to: Low Level Bombsight MK1 info sought ! #881659
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    The early Coastal use with Anson was problematic as it did not have a setting for one of the effective a/s bombs of the time (250 or 500 lb – one size should be missing from the edge scale)

    Without a setting these needed to be dropped by Mk.I eyeball and pre war they were not issued for practice so on commencement of hostilities so no crew had any practice in deployment.

    This was the reason they were withdrawn quickly from Coastal operational aircraft.

    Tests just after the end of the Great War showed that a bomb of greater than 300lb was needed to cause damage to U-Boats of the era.

    Between the wars this lesson was ignored and the standard a/s bomb was set at 100lb. This was the size the crews practiced with.

    On 5th Sept Anson crews in error carried out Blue on Blue attacks on HMS Spearfish and HMS Seahorse with the 100lb weapons with no damage inflicted, then on 3rd Dec HMS Snapper received a blue on blue attack with a direct hit from a 100lb bomb at the base of the conning tower which caused 4 lights to break only.

    The lesson from the Great War needed to be re-learned and the switch was made to a higher weight bomb not covered by the standard settings.

    Ross

    in reply to: Pilot Officer Paul Webb, 602 Sqn, 7th September 1940 #891512
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Two sorties listed, both in N3228

    09.20 – 10.15
    11.55 – 12.15

    He is not listed as airborne when the contact sortie was made circa 17.30 hrs

    Ross

    in reply to: Flying Overalls Unit Insignia #893709
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Hi Alan,

    F1180 has him listed as pilot on OADF Hudson.

    Usually RAF Records did not post to OADU/OADF only attached so No.31 ANS would have been the last paper posting assigned by the Canadian PRC on his arrival.

    Carter DFC and how it was Won lists the unit on DFC award as PRU St Eval.

    He has a few mentions in Ocean Bridge by Christie but all relating to the final flight rather than saying if he was in Canada and volunteered to fly an aircraft back, had been brought over specifically by the return ferry service or had arrived by ship.

    Ross

    in reply to: Stanley James Margrie #903403
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Yup,

    It’s why I got fed up repeating the work.

    All a bit -” I reject your realitly and substitute an alternative of my own liking”.

    Ross

    in reply to: Stanley James Margrie #911228
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Most comes from the precis listed on the Form 1180 Accident Card.

    The ‘board of enquiry’ is a corruption of the ‘Court of Inquiry’ which reported on Form 412.

    The Form 1180 lists the file reference of this as 2582.

    Personnel Registry File is listed as 686 and Form 1669 Casualty Card as 6547.

    Ross

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 826 total)