dark light

Ross_McNeill

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 646 through 660 (of 826 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Is this off an assault glider? #1266129
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    The Sedberg T21 had a similar chunky tail skid.

    Years since I did a daily inspection on one.

    I throw this into the ideas pot

    http://www.mugshots-uk.co.uk/Things/t21.jpg

    Regards
    Ross

    in reply to: Flambard Gannet ECM6 XG831 #1295266
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Hi,

    Had a look at the GAM example when I considered moving the Flambards example.

    1:Can the wings be manually folded? Given that the hydraulic system will be non-existant….

    As far as I am aware the wing fold was mechanical not Hydraulic. Flambards have annually exercised the Wessex rotor fold but not the Gannet wing fold.

    2: What is the width of the aircraft with the wings folded?

    A shade over 6m (6.1m is the magic number for an escorted wide load limited to 40 mph)

    3: What is the mainwheel track? (distance from mainwheel to mainwheel)

    Just under 6m the u/c legs are mounted just inboard of the wing fold.

    Another point.
    Raising the u/c will not do much for reducing the height. Props need to come off as well as the fin.

    Not much to be gained for the exercise might as well leave the u/c down as the o/a diam of the prop tips is a few feet off ground clearance and just under fin top when on mains and nose wheel.

    Unless the deal done a few weeks ago has fallen through the Wessex was destined to stop well short of the NEAM so I will wait and see which rumour is true.

    Regards
    Ross

    in reply to: WANTED; Bristol Bloodhound! #1297013
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Try Steve at Hanningfield Metals, Stock, Essex.

    A few years the yard used to have a surface to air at the entrance. It looked like the Bloodhound/Thunderbird type.

    He loaned to to Channel 4 for the filming of “Spacecadets” but has since had a bit of a clearout so not sure if he still has it.

    Regards
    Ross

    in reply to: Info. request about P.O.W. camp transfers. #1297361
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Hi David,

    Not specifically filtered for L6 (Stalag Luft VI) but all the PoW residents March/April 1944 are given on the following list

    http://www.rafcommands.com/Air%20Force%20PoWs/RAF%20POWs%20Index.html

    Regards
    Ross

    in reply to: Info. request about P.O.W. camp transfers. #1297834
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    PoW 9360 L E Peterson RCAF J/42490
    PoW 2194 D G Mullock RCAF J/85379
    PoW 605 W H Layne RAF 158255
    PoW 3462 H Cooper RCAF J/85935
    PoW 1727 J G Leslie RCAF J/85407

    All the numbers are from Stalag Luft VI roster

    Regards
    Ross

    in reply to: Sunderland W4036 #1299987
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Hi,

    No.201 Sqn

    Coded W

    F/L D J Dolphin RCAF
    F/O D H Longland (Safe)
    F/O Gleigh (sp?) (Injured)
    Sgt C V Ford (Injured)
    F/O M Alexander (Safe)
    Sgt J B Green
    Sgt E Parry
    Sgt J B Cumings

    Took off to practice night landings but overshot the flare path, wing dug in and crashed at 21:55 hrs. Sgt Parry is buried in Mold Cemetery, Flintshire, while F/L Dolphin and Sgt Green are commemorated on the Runnymede Memorial.

    Regards
    Ross

    in reply to: Researching Short Sunderlands #1312873
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Could try these for a start

    L2164
    Damaged in a straffing attack by Me109s of 7/JG26 and set on fire at moorings on the 7th of March. Sgt Jones was returning fire with the Vickers gun at the midships position when he was killed. The aircraft was again attacked on the 10th of March and sank under tow during salvage operations after a further attack by Me109s.

    L5807
    Took off to escort Operation Dunlop reinforcements to Malta. On mooring up in the Camber at 10:00 hrs after landing the Sunderland was attacked and set on fire by Me109s of JG26. Attempts were made to tow the Sunderland to safety but it sank just outside the entrance when the starboard wing fell off.

    N9049
    Damaged by Oblt J Muncheberg of 7/JG26 and set on fire in Marsaxlokk Bay, Malta. The Sunderland later sank at it’s mooring.

    W3996
    Hit by bomb from Ju88 while on slipway.

    Not in ORB.

    T9046
    Damaged at moorings by Me109s on 21/02/42 and sank in a storm.

    SZ570
    Broke away from moorings and wrecked.

    Regards
    Ross

    in reply to: Researching RCAF #1313606
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    A quick Google search gives

    http://www.collectionscanada.ca/genealogy/022-909.007-e.html

    Regards
    Ross

    in reply to: A man and his drawing. #1322072
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Spitfire PR III
    R6598

    F/L T M Lockyer, 37193

    Took off Heston.

    Possibly shot down by Ofw. Staege of 2./LG 2 in a mission to Oostende.

    Lockyer, Thomas Mitchell
    Acting P/O 16th April 1935
    P/O 16 April 1936
    F/O 16 November 1937
    F/L 16 November 1939

    Regards
    Ross

    in reply to: Canberra variant queries (UK) #1331007
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Hi John,

    The RNZAF Pilots Notes for the T Mk.13 AP4326N dated March 1961 (Pre amendment 1) gives the crew as having three ejection seats.

    Pupil Mk3 CT1
    Instructor Mk3 CT2
    Navigator Mk3 CST

    Does your sketch pre date or post date the March 1961 date?

    Regards
    Ross

    in reply to: Canberra variant queries (UK) #1331013
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Hi Bex,

    DoRIS at RAF Museum Hendon hold the RAF Form 78 movement cards for all RAF Aircraft.

    This lists the units/MUs etc and the dates the aircraft was transferred to/from.

    Any accidents are usually also listed and there should be a relevant Form 1180 on the microfilm at Hendon for the incident.

    Regards
    Ross

    in reply to: Anyone want to bring a cockpit to Bruntingthorpe? #1244821
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Sorry Ritch but XH175 is booked to attend a local event on Sat 19th May, British Legion event Sat 9th June then Cockpit Fest 16/17th June.

    The tolerance of the other half for the ‘hunk of metal’ would be strained beyond endurance if I tried to add another event to May.

    Ross

    in reply to: Canberra variant queries (UK) #1247073
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Hi Jackonicko

    PR9 – recce version with opening offset ‘fighter type canopy’ for access, nav on ejection seat in front of pilot in sideways hinged nose, with frangible panel above. (Prototype combined PR fuselage with B(I)8 type glazed nose and no ejection seat for nav). New wing with modest increase in span and increased chord inboard of engines. More powerful engines. Powered ailerons. (Does anyone have an official length and span figure for the PR.Mk 9 from an AP4326?)

    From AP101B-0409-1A
    Length 66′ 8″
    Span 67′ 10″

    Regards
    Ross

    in reply to: One Year On . . . Canberra WF922 plus Exhibiting #1254224
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    I’ve been doing it on a supervised one to one basis on XH175 recently in prep for a possible Cockpit Fest activity.

    I talk through a start up drill for both pilot and nav positions with the person sitting in the seat. Before any switch is flipped I explain the sensations that will happen eg noise, lights, movement.

    Both kids and adults have an incredible look of sheer pleasure when a control item responds to their finger selection.

    First lights brighten and dim to twist control. Next fault lamps light in response to Press to Test and Day/Night screens are set. Background noise increases in stages as invertors are spun up. Whole displays/gauges animate when their on switch is selected. Dolls eyes flicker and chatter.

    For my part I firmly believe that tactile is the way to go and most military hardware is overspeced so switches do stand up to the increased handling.

    Now the comments are not just ‘look at all the dials and switches’ but two way exchanges on how did they escape/strap in in x seconds? How did they stand the noise?. Is that the smell of history?

    Instead of the view being fleeting the experience is relived with each telling to relatives and showing of the camera phone piccy.

    Yes its labour intensive and limiting both in number of people who can experience it and sadly, at the moment, limited to able bodied. It is an area where individual collectors and small museums can add value and one that I feel should be exploited. Just need work on the application methods.

    Ross

    in reply to: Buccaneer XV863 #1256316
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Essentially the same device but one is the intelligent one and the other is a dumb repeater.

    The Mk30 for the nav is the master instrument.
    This contains a normal pressure alt capsule as the backup but the primary pressure circuits accept an input from a remote Pressure Error Correction Unit (PECU) to display a more accurate height than that derived from the alt capsule.

    The electronic height derived from the PECU is output to the Mk29 and used as a servo input (the Mk29 also has a pressure capsule as a backup).

    The Mk30 also has the function of retransmitting the aircraft height as a Flight Level (FL) to the Secondary Surveilance Radar System for display on the ATC ground radar scopes.

    By the way, I think that your new TT.18 panel was scrapped by Park Aviation after disposal from the Battle Damage Flight.

    Regards
    Ross

Viewing 15 posts - 646 through 660 (of 826 total)